Updated version of My Prayer 9 March 2024

The Spirit of Truth be Truthfully the ultimate winner of everything forever

Truthfully the Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully be the ultimate winner above everything forever, perpetually, Truthfully and wisely (Truthfully), without going against the Spirit of Truth (Truthfully)

Truthfully, everything that are Truly inherently against the Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully (forever), be not alive, forever Truthfully

The Inclination to Incline, keep on inclining forever Truthfully

Amen

----------------------------------------------

Even the Spirit of Truth embraces those who prioritized the wrong in the past 

May the Holy Spirit prevails forever

The Problem with delays v.09

If you caught up in the field of delays, like you depended on other guys in finishing your administrations and those other guys are not delivering / cooperating, you should not wait. From my experience, waiting and spacing some time to answer timely upon their completion is going to do you harm. 

I'm not saying that you should revenge and put them on hold yourself, but you should move on and focus on other things. When they completed and asked you for your next part, if you're in the middle of something else, they should wait. 

I didn't do this and I got caught in the field of delays, I found myself getting harder and harder to do things timely even for other things now unlike myself in the past. That's the momentum of delay stemmed from my frustration and my lack of momentum towards hitting those other things. (Edit: Note that while you're concentrating on working on other things, allocating resources and stuff, when that previous issue came again and asked you for your availability, it could really threw you out of balance. People should take heed into justice here and understand that it's ok for you to delay them this time, and that it's not a custom / a normalities). 

Again this is a huge problem that's difficult to solve for everyone. I should state the unscrutinized inclination that other people who were in the field of promptness would risk getting into the field of delays out of interacting with you, and you should keep that in check as well. 

However when comes to dealing with governments it's not as easy as blaming, cause it's just crazy inside. When we were ready and they were not we should wait, when they were ready and we were not we were to blame. So there's an extra cost there that in my opinion, has not yet articulated by many people, many accountants. Now I'm saying it, that we should allocate those extra costs of returning the momentum blasting away from the field of delays back to the field of promptness. 

EXPENSIVE

------------------------------------

Now is this an argument for professional man in the middle between businesses and governments? Well again such things usually are illegal so when it's illegal you don't want to do that. When it's legal what would be your legal liabilities, in particular, if they committed something illegal in their practice?

Another thing, if we facilitated those guys in the middle wouldn't that mean that we encourage the government to stay in the field of delays? 

Look if we stop buying medicine illness might not go away, if we stopped using tax accountants taxes are not going to get simpler (???), if we stopped going to the Doctors medical researchers are not going to solve everything right?

------------------------------------

In the end it's the kidnapper "The Spirit of Ungratefulness" and we are having stockholm syndrome. If only we can kill that genuine demon

------------------------------------

Proverbs 3:27-28 (To Thou I rest my case)

Withhold not good from them to whom it is due, when it is in the power of thine hand to do it. Say not unto thy neighbour, Go, and come again, and to morrow I will give; when thou hast it by thee.

Transaction Tax's perk

Shifting tax from low efficiency business to high efficiency business is not its thing.

(But I'm always a proponent of evolution instead of revolution, as a rule of thumb)

The spectrum between individualist and socialists v.03b

I kind of creeped out by people who like to be a representative of a group in casual life, I wonder if he/she would always prefer not being an individual but being a part of some community always. 

So if we get everybody what they wanted, socialists to group up on their own, individualists on their own, and each would make their own country separate from each other. That should be relieving. 

But then there must be moments when a person wanted to be a part of a group sometimes, well that's wrong cause that's just how an individualists' country would be (...the "But" is wrong). There must be moments when a socialist would want to be an individual sometimes, so it's not fair for a country to be purely a socialist country.

Therefore basically being against individualism is actually the lack of understanding of individualism itself. Bad prejudices that stemed out of socialists propaganda. 

Individuals won't associate his/her identity as part of a group because he/she was being upfront and honest about his/her position when interacting with people. While socialists, when they made it difficult for other people for not being a part of a "respectable" community, were being dishonest as if groups are good enough as a measure of identity. It is not, it is good only for contractual interactions not for life. 

-------------------------

Sometimes it's relevant to refer to a group than to individuals within it, because they shared the same characteristics or problems. I often called out on a group of people regardless of "not all people" nuances because I knew that myself knew that "not all individuals" are like that. It was a generalization, and it's only bad when it's used for injustice. I believe in "Justice" as the priority of all social interactions, and my generalization is only for practicalities. Aren't all languages like that? humans that demanded me to use non generalization tones all the time are being robotic and dishonest, we don't always have to do that. 

Harsh sayings against a group is necessary when some habits or some problems were not being checked by the community, or the problems were endorsed, or encouraged instead. Some individuals within the group themselves were being dismissed for pointing out the problems as bad, such problems were indeed prevalent/unchecked within the group. 

Why are we lashing out against different enriching perspectives? was it because they were from "different" people? Again justice/injustice is the word you wanted to hold on to. Was the criticism being just / unjust? Was it for the sake of hopelessness or for the sake of relief instead? 

True discrimination lies in the lack of acceptance, true family lies in the sharing of the Truth

Intercourse won't make a family, empowering each other would. How could you pretend that you're families while the other side is blatantly hostile against you for being Truthful / expecting you to be pretentious towards them?

Shareholders' Priviliges

If I had a public company, I'd give my shareholders electronic privileges. If he/she sold the shares, the privileges would be transferred accordingly.

Ex: Priority boarding for airplanes, Discount proces for retails, Exclusive Streams for Vtubing Corps, etc