Melki Hassa's Blog

In my previous post, I'm talking about finding that "standard for the appropriate magnitudes of rewards" would be the next singularity... I think this is not just standard, this has a "Constant" element to it.  Personally, I believe that this is true, but I have no proof yet: "Evil is a real concept (an absolute concept) and the Magnitude of Evil is measurable" "Consequences of Evil could be dispersed or managed" "Lowering one's expectations of rewards can not reduce the total magnitude of evil invoked, it will just disperse/bend the focus" and from the previous post "Evil is inevitably invoked by lack of reciprocity" I'm optimistic that this could be discovered empirically

If you look at the research done about relationship of crime and the Gini Ratio, Gini Ratio being the rate of income inequality within a region, it is positively correlated. So if there were a lot of disparities in income, crime rate is higher, equal amounts of income, lower.  On one hand you want to reward the people who have performed well, on the other hand you also want to keep the crimes low. Some people, a religion in particular proposed a solution that people shouldn't show off their wealth. This has a strong reasoning, however it is kind of sad and demeaning of humanity how people are so unable to deal with this, it is a bad thing to be luxurious ever once in a while (but it seems to me that it is the Truth).  The Love of Money is the root of all evil, Jesus said. And it goes both ways, the service receptor loved money so much they refused to reward, the service provider loved money so much they refused to cease from being bitter about not getting the amounts they expected

I think, it would be viable to research this notion: "The development of evil is directly caused by lack of reciprocity" So whenever there was a person who have solved problems not getting paid or rewarded. You'd be certain that evil is growing in that environment.  Corruption, depression, lies, maliciousness, unproductive contentions.  So if this were true, society could reliably shift some of the responsibilities from the perpetrators. I know its sounds despicable and lazy, to me too, but if this is true that the growth of evil is certain, inevitable whenever there's a lack of reciprocity in the air.  Then more appropriate measures could be made... not necessarily monetary or materialistic commodity wise, but also escape wise. -------------------------------------------------- Imagine this scenario, ok...  A priest and a nun in a village, often take care of people, giving them food and medicine.  One day they ran out, and one of them got sick.  Then instead of sprea

Yes when it comes to the Truth He is too great for a mind to fathom Yes we don't really know what we are talking about When we are using Words But It is the Truth It is just relativity Just relativity, but Yes it is It is the Truth We don't really know what we are talking about Yes Yes Yes But It is also the Truth The Truth has revealed Himself to us through the Word The Word, The Word of the Truth It is just relativity The Word But Yes,       it is also the Truth I don't really know what I'm talking about However... The Truth is The Truth will always be Embracing me Through the Word Yes it is ... Just relativity But Yes it is             ... ----------------------------------------------- It is ok though, It is fine It is just The Truth The Truth through The Word, Relativity It is ok for us... it is fine Relativity, is ok Absolutely... Yes it is

Now why do we have personal property? In my opinion personal property is an artificial right. No one is born with land, or gold, or whatever it is we know as personal property. Except our body such as our limbs maybe those are indeed examples of divine personal properties, maybe, honestly its too complicated for me now. But for sure things such as the ownership of land and other goods are those that are maintained by people, governments in particular. What makes them essential is that without them the level of availability of mutual solutions would decrease. First of all personal interests must be exalted for the idea of mutual solutions would work, not group interests, personal interests. And then, for the sake of the improvement of their prosperity, people should have something to go back to and grow. That has enabled immense power of humanity to be harnessed and made things possible. Denial of that would violate mutual trusts and interests we have for each other, plus our reward

Absolute profit is impossible, yes I still get by to that. It means that no matter how much you have solved other people's problems, you would never "deserve" more than what others "deserve" from you. This also considering inclinations as individuals. This seemed to be contrary to my other proposed notion that "Everybody deserve everything", well it is actually not... because zero is not profit. But let me elaborate more on that: The Idea of justice is that everybody deserve everything they want and need, but since we are limited in terms of solutions, justice is also improvements towards there. Why everybody deserve everything? One strong reason for that is that we are not born out of our own decision, we are dragged into existence not on our own will, therefore it is only fair that we should like it. Ok, I have posts that have elaborated some of the issues with the idea in this blog, please check them out if you will but now lets explore furthe

As I talked about in the previous post, most guys have innate tendencies to fight. And there are multiple benefits to this, some might not as obvious as the others. It is intuitive for guys who have experienced many fights to identify "the lines". There are lines that if crossed would reasonably lead to conflict. How intense would the conflict be, also have levels of lines. If you just look at it from the outside, your subconscious wouldn't get the feel to it... you might be able to rationalize it to a certain degree, but know that your subconscious too could contribute to the understanding. Such know and feel are pretty common among guys, but it doesn't mean that it is a privilege that should not be applied to everybody. It should because it is real and archetypal. Let's say your kids often create a ruckus messing with other kids' toys and being physically annoying. It is so obvious to guys that there is no tolerance for causing problems for other people.

Google searched it in July 2020:  https://www.google.com/search?q=the+guardian+crime+in+video+games&rlz=1C1CHBF_idID854ID854&oq=the+guardian+crime+in+video+games&aqs=chrome..69i57j33.7267j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 I saw this article and asked myself, can this issue be answered using the point of view of inclinations? Well if I used the point of view of inclinations then the answer would be in agreement with it. The crimes committed in video games are bad/unethical and the characters in the video games are actually living beings since they are self-preserving, and very alive since they use means of self-communication to self-preserve. Realizing this I say, damn... this is not good. Because I know it in my heart that the thing is ok, it is not a crime, it is the opposite of a crime, it is good information, a simulation. Now, what makes us feel that it is fine to simulate? What constitutes reality vs simulations? Are the characters in video games that are