Melki Hassa's Blog

This is the question, is prioritizing Justice always in align with prioritizing the Truth? I found the yes answer, and it is going to be quite a bit of an answer,  Firstly you could observe truthfully an event like when a person is telling a lie, you could observe truthfully when a person decided not to say anything, you could observe truthfully when a person is saying the truth. The Truth is more than your speech.  However the Truth has the room to grow,  From my point of view, the Truth is the protocol that everything follows, that there is only one true past. So when you believed in lies, that wrong perception of yours would be a gift or a fragrant present for the Truth when they are being truthfully corrected. However, since there is also momentum for wrongness, (one wrong leads to another in one way or the other) so believing in lies is dangerous and it is unattractive for those who are predetermined to dislike some of the particular problems associated with it.  But Faith indeed

I like to watch CNBC, Bloomberg, RT, Yahoo, IDX for financial news and talks. Not that do that often, I should do that more often but when I wanted such information those are my go to channels. With RT in particular Keiser Report, they encourage the usage of bitcoin and they trash the fiat money (regular money).  So I always said that money represents that the holder has helped and hasn't been helped back, or it should mean that. In this time of difficulty, some governments decided to take expansive policies, handing stimulus or giving out cash to people. From a point of view the policy is a relief for a lot of worries, however it is at the cost of the value of money. The same way if gold kept on being discovered or even created in a lab, then people would've wanted more of it in exchange for the same amounts of products/services they provide. Bitcoin however, from what I concluded watching the Keiser Report, is not as liable to the degeneration of value as the fiat money, I do

Firstly, I feel bad for posting the "Question is" post, so maybe this post' quality is going to be different than the others because its a "make amends" kind of post or "dodgy", but what else should I do? So, there is the negative type of motivation, like that in the "Question is" post, 2 posts before this, and of course there is the positive type of motivation. Positive types are those that have been motoring the economy mainly. If you see policies that were made for the productivity of the economy, it is always about political stability and the availability of various kinds of resources. And above all that, Justice, the core of every policies.  You might not be motivated if the place where people say you should go offered you none of your needs... but you would still help people more and more if you'd acquire money. Because with money, people would help you out in return.  You might not be experiencing the negative type of motivation if

In the time of the pandemic, a lot of people saved up their money and this might increase the dragging down of the economy, as businesses' sales will decrease and prices will also decrease below decent sustainable level of profitability.  So when people spend their money, identifiable by the transfer of VAT or PPN in Indonesia, the central bank and the banking system could acknowledge them. Something like: "Thank you, your spending has contributed to the recovery of the economy" Notifications like that should feel good, and maybe another facility like loyalty stamps, after certain amounts and/or frequencies of spending, the bank account would receive a badge. The badge facilitates the holder with the possibility of cheaper credit rates, or cheaper down payments rates. (So maybe don't instantly, universally lower the interest rates. Pick and choose, incentivize).  Maybe the loyalty stamps could apply for tax rates, or discounts at government owned businesses. And also

I was thinking about two different temperaments and how it is a bit complicated to figure out policies or set ups that should be implemented in the career world for them.  The Serenity types vs The Intimate types The Serenity types' pinnacle of life would be to not worry about things, such as poverty. The Intimate types would want to be remembered, cherished, and cared, maybe even revered to.  Having these two types together would have these implications... If you want to keep the serene people modest, you would ignore them as much as you can while they are modest. Then their motivation to become richer and more powerful would be significantly less.  If you want to keep the intimate people modest, while they are modest you cared about them, glorify their modesty, and keep giving them attention... then they'll lose a large drive to become richer.  Another way of achieving the same would be, To keep the rich and powerful people of the serene occupied, and to leave the rich and po

Starting with Logic, Logic is interwoven with the Truth. Through the truth manifests Logic and through Logic manifests the Truth.  When comes to Logic we talk about what's true and what is not. One and Zero in programming, 1 0 That is currently how I see it, so... The truth is the protocol that everything follows that there's only one true past. What is true in the truth? True in this sense is that there's only one past that is true. What is true within the true truth?  That there is only one true past. What is true within the true of the true Truth? ONE True Past... the Truth. Therefore our sense of the truth relies on the existence of extra protocols, or the hierarchy of protocols, and the existence of the wrong order, which is the wrong protocols, or the not protocols.  Hence the manifestation of Accuracy in Logic.  Could there be the inclination to keep on inclining to not incline forever? Should be, but it is not in presence... it is NOT in presence.  

So I tried something and it worked a bit, to experience dreaming while I'm awake. What I did was... sometimes when you're doing nothing in your bed, you closed your eyes, you saw a little glimpse of image. I think we all have that, a pre-dream. So I remembered that image and while still closing my eyes, I keep on picturing it, zooming in, or moving it around so that I could see it from a different angle, zooming in, zooming in. And then let it go... don't try to control what happened, don't audit, or criticize, just experience... and that's when I saw things that's dreamy. Different environments, different objects, weird physics, random locations at a time.  So when you focus, you don't focus like focusing on work. You use every focus you have but that ... So to make it happen, try it when you have nothing else to worry about or interested about thinking. Just feel like sleeping, that's it. And as soon as the picture/object appeared, remember it.  Edit:

Power have different types, those that I could identify are: Force and Barrier.  Force, is the kind of power to reduce the government's potential for income tax from the target... jk I mean, it is for reducing the target's Economic potentials and advantages.  Barrier, its property or "safe space" where the power is used to prevent debilitating influences from hindering one's growth Converting one to substitute for another is costly, so if you want to focus on force you'd sacrifice the quality of your barrier. Its going to take more power to build it up again to the same quality as before, even if the target was reduced to nothing. And there would be other exposures as well according to the situation.  A barrier is reinforced by positive results of negotiations. Instead of focusing on force, it would be more resource efficient to improve your proficiency in using negotiation technologies such as the law, the media, the internet, etc. 

You know, I think small towns or village areas have this potential: Big advanced cities such as New York, Tokyo, Sydney, Seoul, etc are built over mistakes. They are products of evolution. But the formula they have now isn't incorporating those past mistakes anymore. So if you build your community, your businesses, your town over those formulas... you would get all the advancements with little dealing with all the mistakes. I'm saying it should be possible within 10 or 20 years to have that quality of a city if people started from scratch.  Obviously the clear example of this are what the Chinese people managed to accomplish. They grew at incredible rate for this past 20 years, recreated their whole country into an advanced economy. That's because they've utilized the good and not having to deal with all the bad.  However, if you do this and you've reached the full potential of the formula. Then you got to deal with new mistakes. Now you are at the forefront of the

I wonder why some countries with frequent use of drugs is wealthy like the Netherlands and some others are not as wealthy. Do all illegal drugs really has debilitating effects on people's mental health or some aren't? But this is I'm sure, that if you created laws that were frequently violated by the people, in other words, you put the people in the position that's always against the written law. Then this is a case of conflicting or contradicting infrastructures of the relationships between people.  People would always have this mindset that one should be disregarded over the other, written laws or customs. I mean if the customs were really bad then the written laws should win, if the written laws were bad, yes there are some, then customs should win. It is easy when it is obvious, but when it is not... its like telling/treating a kid who has gay (oldschool and newschool gay) tendencies that he was not a good person.  Now, the more people are being put in that situatio

This is what Paul said,   Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things  are  honest, whatsoever things  are  just, whatsoever things  are  pure, whatsoever things  are  lovely, whatsoever things  are  of good report; if  there be  any virtue, and if  there be  any praise, think on these things. ( https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/phl/4/8/s_1107008) And the famous:  And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these  is  charity. (https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/1co/13/1/s_1075001) Charity is actually AGAPE, Love      - affection, good will, love, benevolence, brotherly love     - love feasts (https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/Lexicon/Lexicon.cfm?strongs=G26&t=KJV, outline of biblical usage, September 2020 ) So it is well known among Christians, all this bleak ass prophecy in the bible, about how the antichrist is going to kill all the good people on earth (maybe it means on land). But we Christians tend to always do this: In or

I think the death and resurrection and the ascension and the promise to return of Jesus Christ is a poetry: What is Justice: I say Justice is when everybody gets what they needed and wanted. No one asked to be born in this world so it is only fair that we all like it.  What is Evil: Evil is the potential for misallocation of resources. It is the opposite of Justice. Why Evil? Scarcity is the result of Evil, according to my interpretation of the bible. The Garden of Eden is a place of abundance, and after humanity sinned, scarcity arose.   Humans ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil.  We became able to understand what is not fair, what would be problematic in the future, what would be painful for us and so for other people/creatures, how to increase the scarcity of some resources for others, how to rank people politically - who deserves less, and who deserves more. Nakedness is vulnerability to be judged and be lowered in rank by others.  Upon our understanding, came our liabilit

Now I shouldn't be talking about this if it weren't a trend challenging proposition.  And I will talk about this only under the premise to challenge a trend, my personal feelings in regards to my personal relationships should not be conveyed. Some people made remarks to hurt other people using the innuendo of the meaning of their words. But there are other types of expression that is being bullied as a spirit, that is spontaneity.  Some people create works of art or stories based on what is interesting in their mind and feelings at the time. Turned out some of those elements may have came from watching the sufferings of their friend or other people. Now does that mean that he disregarded the feelings of the friend upon the publication of the work? Yes, if his friend definitely worries about innuendoes all the time or maybe in another case was in a neurotic state of mind. Yes he disregarded it but does it mean that he meant all the mean things that might be derived from it in al

I get it now, I get it now why I always feel like I'm a relatable person, not much different than others (but people seem to think that I'm weird).  Even my friends, I'm sure they knew that my processing power in terms of common stuffs are... allright.  But I could keep up with things such as thoughts, poetry, songs, in ways that other people would find to be kind of impressive sometimes. It is because the lightness of the words that is in my mind.  These words are not tied to meanings such as innuendos like in the minds of other people.  These words are light, and meanings stable and assured and consistent. I could play with them like a math equation pretty easily. Because their meanings have little interference if it were to be moved around in the realm of suppositions.  I'm sure I'm a Genius, but my field has not yet been found (by me). If you think I'm kind of impressive with words... you could try my style, you would be surprised how easy it actually is.  I

So here you are a high IQ big brain all knowing all quick witted the beast master of the world of innuendos. You are so good you are too classy to just have 1 meaning in your words ever, it would always mean 10 or 20 other compact and fractal meanings that would make everyone around you bow down in the destruction of their unworthy self esteem.  Now, unfortunately because of that... everything you said even everything you didn't had been used against you. And you, cornered, had nowhere to go but to destroy your own ego.  But, no... you doubled down... banding up with people who had nothing to do with your life you became the most feared warlordnnuendos of your neighborhood. Now, no one dare to say anything when you are around, cause of Miranda. Miranda the most powerful Goddess of all is on your side. (Except at the court of law but that's the only place your neighborhood is not). Now, what's life, what's the meaning of their words, their "comforting" words, t

1. Do it for fun 2. There is no contract/agreement in it, is there a hypothetical husband... or hypothetical wife? If there were, was it an actual marriage? 3. Don't be so quick to get offended. When things get serious, seek verification first. This world is not clear, so no one should be obliged to be tied to their "supposed" hints. No one including the bullies. Many times it is going to be misunderstandings anyway. So back to no.1 4. Don't fight in it. You'll ruin it for everybody.  5. Everyone can choose to participate or not to participate. You'd know a toxic community when they use innuendos for everything that is important. This is a sign for trying to avoid being clear most of the time. So already this is a red flag. No matter what, written law wants to be your friend. It is there, it is public domain, it is always available for everyone. People who always want to avoid that realm are trying to not be about it.  Again no. 3, realize that some people mad

Orang jahat kode kode untuk membuli orang... Semua orang musti belajar kode kode jangan sampai tidak sengaja membuat kode seperti orang jahat itu (peduli amat itu menghina bahasa dan keadilan) Orang jahat cuma mau bersikap baik dihadapan intimidasi... Semua orang harus belajar bergaya tampang depresif dan penuh stres, biar cater to the pain sama orang2 jahat Orang jahat suka belok kiri walaupun melanggar lampu merah... Semua orang musti kasi tanda dari jauh jauh kalau mau lurus di sebelah kiri.  Orang jahat ambil jalur motor di sebelah kiri... Semua orang yang di jalur mobil kiri musti weser, pip pip, dan siap dicaci dimaki dari belakang kalau mau belok kiri karena dianggap berhenti di jalur kanan di depan lampu merah.  Sekarang, kita merasa diri kita sangar dan punya taring, karena hidup di tempat kita susah. Tapi jujur lebih kayak kita membiarkan budaya kita didikte sama orang-orang jahat ------------------------------------------------------ Sekarang coba kita ingat ingat sejarah ke

In an unequal society, it is harder to be significant. Your best attempts often minusculed by the achievements of the ultra-industrious and the hyper intellectuals.  Hard to be meaningful, hard to find purpose, hard to be someone.  But the answer to this is actually: Give Thanks Who cares about the giants, they are forces of nature... just kidding. But the real giants of your life is the contributors of your life. And if you could do something for them, solve some of their problems. You don't have to be the biggest, or the most unique, or the scariest even. You've achieved meaningfulness and you are a legend. https://youtu.be/CtWirGxV7Q8, Sept 2020 .... LEGEND

I watched a Big Think video where Prof Michio Kaku talked about dreams. From that video I concluded that our auditing system were shut off during dreams.  Here's the video, Accessed September 2020: https://youtu.be/h7eYt4ZmkR8 Dream is the time we explore our mind without accuracy. We'd just explore and we would be wrong, as well as we would be right. It is an experience of a super reality that pushes the boundaries of our suppositions.  The results of this exploration are feelings. The feelings we get from dreams can contribute to real life especially when it started to fall into the likeness of the dreams.  So when we felt certain things about reality, jolts of anxiety, excitements, or some kind of familiar feelings, we would instigate extra considerations into the situation. Were there actually hidden opportunities? or a hidden danger? What kind of feelings I could potentially experience having this feeling about the current situation?  So dreams could contribute to our conc

So a form of this has actually manifested in reality... it is the system of law.  First we have the declaration of independence, and then the basic constitutions, the constitutions and then the bills, and so on. Supported by culture, ethics, contracts/negotiations, discussions or communications, art-forms, etc.  ---------------------------------------------------------- Actually after I think about it, this is it... this is the answer to the whole aerodynamic thing I was thinking about. This is the best manifestation of it. And I'm glad that I have acquired another point of view why this makes sense. Thank you God :)

  [Mat 7:16 KJV] 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Now a solid form means there are barrier to transformations for the system and the members of the system. And somehow there is a reason why, audit is not conducted all day everyday. Not only audit is an expensive venture, well actually audit is an expensive venture is the reason, but audit can be expensive in many different ways.  In terms of time, energy (psychological and physical), formation wise or readiness, money, expertise, opportunities, reputational stakes, etc.  But the Truth is the utmost priority of everything, and lies are dangerous. So we have to audit.  The Matthew 7:16 standard is my favorite. If we want to know whether or not our front-liners  still moving towards the total supremacy of the Inclination to keep on Inclining Forever, forever all the way forward... and not going the other way, we should measure their level of depression using that standard. Of the

I was wrong about the Child and the Responsibility and the Producer of Dreams. I associated responsibility with negative emotions. I should stop doing that. The Child is the one that is so wise and smart, they are able to sustain themselves only with positive emotions truthfully. The criteria is not about producing dreams, it is about living the dream. And the way they are doing this should not be restricted to the amount of profit they could amass. But it lies in how they use it

 So if these solids were companies, then the one at the front is the producer of dreams. The company should be the least ruled by negative emotions.  Now, in order to arrange the companies as a ship, you don't force them to be unhappy or happy. It is not about the same identity, it is about the same position. So in a dimension it is aerodynamic, but in another dimension it is organic.  What I mean by that is, our body replaces its substance constantly. So the body as an identity is about the formation, not about the particular members.  But don't get me wrong, I don't want to replace the law or morality, again I'm all about add-on not revolution.  So Individualism is the best, it is not about dismissing the individuals, but it is about ranking up the individuals based on their depression level (inversely).  So when one's depressed, he should work for the back end companies, once he/she had achieved serenity and positivism, he/she should be pushed forward.  The middl

Gas state > Particles without connections. They could move towards the same direction and produce force but they are not bound to one another Liquid state > Particles with multiple ways of relating to one another, and the more they are dynamic the less the viscosity, the less they are changing the way the connect with each other the more they are gooey.  Solid State > Particles with singular way of connecting to each other, most of the time, and most of the time they are in the state of connection with each other.  If I suppose evil being forces of friction for the progress of the economy... we might find aerodynamic state useful. But disclaimer beforehand I don't feel like saying this because it could contrast my ego.  To be aerodynamic you have to be solid.  Maybe only the outer part the inside might not necessarily entirely solid... right? (oh I'm so annoyed with this thought)   And you have to be like a pyramid, or pointy.  But this pyramid is not like a tomb, it i

 In recent times, I have go about doing things that tire myself significantly. Something that other people wouldn't even acknowledge. And what I got from it is silly actually,  Don't bite more than you can chew.  The world is fractal, your comfort zone is where you could sense the segments of the fractal and audit it, triangulate it at least. And in here, here is where you kill the demons. Because evil is fractal as well, destroying bad things at your zone meaning dealing damage for the whole thing in all fractals.  The stupidest thing we could do is to go out of our comfort zone, and expected that we would do well for sure. What would likely happen are, wasted opportunities to deal more damage to bad things of our part.   Don't get me wrong, going out of your comfort zone is important and it is wonderful, I encourage everybody to do so. But when you do, don't forget this: Your understanding is better than before? Maybe, (plausible if you're sure about it). You'

Big sites gather our data and they could use our information to influence behaviors of a demographic. For example making some information less available in search for people who are critical to the government in order to reduce their tendencies to be critical.  I think people could ask for sites to provide reports of their data aggregations as corporate social responsibility or like financial statements, because that's our data too To demonstrate my point, let us check out netflix' privacy policy... Check out the part "Matched Identifier Communications", in there we could see that not only companies gather visitors' information, they also made sense of them combined with our data from other sites. I mean there are some limitations to what extent they could do this, but still it means that if someone in the company intended to break the law, the consequences are potentially personally harmful for us.  Check out Netflix' terms and conditions no.7 I quote partial

I recently focused on why am I frustrated with women so much,  I used to went to an ex all female school where there was just 6 of us boys and 40 something of girls in class all the way from the first to the sixth grade. And then I got exposed to more and more masculine "world". I definitely feel that both have traits that should complement each other.  But it seems to me that most female are disciplined in not being a utilitarian. Like a seed, deliberately planted in all women to curb practicality. It is as if the people they hang out with will hammer down the nail of utilitarianism if they sensed that there was one. The Indonesian word I love to use is kemanjuran. It seems like they deliberately not prioritizing kemanjuran like a universal "statement".  Now I feel it in my bones that if they would just cut it, if they would just stop it, they would become exponentially superior to men in many many solution types. But I don't know why, they just won't... th

If we want to pinpoint the accurate prices of each goods and services, we would want to figure out the direction of the economic progress. Therefore we would want to know the path or the terrain as the location.  What I could say is that if you take all the expectations of the participators of the economy, merged them accountably, then you would get the path. After you get the path then you could pinpoint where you are or where your economy's are in relative to the path. The path itself is constantly morphing following the second law.  But put the morph to the side for now.  There are 2 types of expectations: The Conscious and The Subconscious.  You get the subconscious by answering the question, what is the best state of your psyche and your physical body could be? Where are your psyche and your physical currently situated? And this applies to everybody. So, when you get that... merge them all... you'd be able to position the economy's subconscious state. Then, the conscio

Justice is the field that must be played by all people. As long as there are more than one person in this world, Justice is king. In economy, or medicine, or accounting, you don't have to be an expert, and that's in everyone's best interest. But in terms of Justice, we can't. Justice is complex, I'm not saying that everyone must be a lawyer, I'm also not saying that everyone can be perfect when it comes to Justice... What I'm saying is everyone is expected to be just no matter what.  And that's what's unique about Justice, if you don't prioritize Justice that's arrogance. So it is the best for me not to back you up when you fall because of arrogance. Helping arrogance would not do any good for the person nor for other people. No matter what the service he/she has done to the world, when things go down because of the arrogance, you'd only do harm in helping him/her out.  So I've said this, don't expect me to back you up for your ow

So when Adam and Eve ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil, they then discovered nakedness.  This is my assumption: By covering up, they increase the rareness of their reward, sex is a form of reward.  Increasing rarity doesn't always mean less, it could even mean more. Especially sex People have been increasing the rarity of their help ever since the beginning. But while they are doing so, the risk of misallocation arise. As the judgement of whats deserving fell in the hands of men ----------------------------------------------------- This is wrong... its about shame not about rarity

Evil is like this, your body allocates resources to the part that has been working. If you've ran 1000 meters then resources would be allocated to your legs Muscles will grow so it also would use a lot of resources.  Evil is like those resources went to your arms instead of your legs. So the potential to misallocate, and once there is a misallocation it will propagate further misallocations... so yeah the potential to misallocate.  But its complicated, because the economy is not about the amount of works, but the quality of the solutions.  We got to go to the issue of why problem solvers need to be allocated resources and, by how much But before that lets go back 1 step and note that it is the misallocation of resources, instead of the absense of resources. So evil is not the facilitated by the magnitude of the rewards available, but the misallocation of it. It is true I think, but from the point of view of the whole economy, playing around with availability would always be misallo

In my previous post, I'm talking about finding that "standard for the appropriate magnitudes of rewards" would be the next singularity... I think this is not just standard, this has a "Constant" element to it.  Personally, I believe that this is true, but I have no proof yet: "Evil is a real concept (an absolute concept) and the Magnitude of Evil is measurable" "Consequences of Evil could be dispersed or managed" "Lowering one's expectations of rewards can not reduce the total magnitude of evil invoked, it will just disperse/bend the focus" and from the previous post "Evil is inevitably invoked by lack of reciprocity" I'm optimistic that this could be discovered empirically

If you look at the research done about relationship of crime and the Gini Ratio, Gini Ratio being the rate of income inequality within a region, it is positively correlated. So if there were a lot of disparities in income, crime rate is higher, equal amounts of income, lower.  On one hand you want to reward the people who have performed well, on the other hand you also want to keep the crimes low. Some people, a religion in particular proposed a solution that people shouldn't show off their wealth. This has a strong reasoning, however it is kind of sad and demeaning of humanity how people are so unable to deal with this, it is a bad thing to be luxurious ever once in a while (but it seems to me that it is the Truth).  The Love of Money is the root of all evil, Jesus said. And it goes both ways, the service receptor loved money so much they refused to reward, the service provider loved money so much they refused to cease from being bitter about not getting the amounts they expected

I think, it would be viable to research this notion: "The development of evil is directly caused by lack of reciprocity" So whenever there was a person who have solved problems not getting paid or rewarded. You'd be certain that evil is growing in that environment.  Corruption, depression, lies, maliciousness, unproductive contentions.  So if this were true, society could reliably shift some of the responsibilities from the perpetrators. I know its sounds despicable and lazy, to me too, but if this is true that the growth of evil is certain, inevitable whenever there's a lack of reciprocity in the air.  Then more appropriate measures could be made... not necessarily monetary or materialistic commodity wise, but also escape wise. -------------------------------------------------- Imagine this scenario, ok...  A priest and a nun in a village, often take care of people, giving them food and medicine.  One day they ran out, and one of them got sick.  Then instead of sprea

Yes when it comes to the Truth He is too great for a mind to fathom Yes we don't really know what we are talking about When we are using Words But It is the Truth It is just relativity Just relativity, but Yes it is It is the Truth We don't really know what we are talking about Yes Yes Yes But It is also the Truth The Truth has revealed Himself to us through the Word The Word, The Word of the Truth It is just relativity The Word But Yes,       it is also the Truth I don't really know what I'm talking about However... The Truth is The Truth will always be Embracing me Through the Word Yes it is ... Just relativity But Yes it is             ... ----------------------------------------------- It is ok though, It is fine It is just The Truth The Truth through The Word, Relativity It is ok for us... it is fine Relativity, is ok Absolutely... Yes it is

Now why do we have personal property? In my opinion personal property is an artificial right. No one is born with land, or gold, or whatever it is we know as personal property. Except our body such as our limbs maybe those are indeed examples of divine personal properties, maybe, honestly its too complicated for me now. But for sure things such as the ownership of land and other goods are those that are maintained by people, governments in particular. What makes them essential is that without them the level of availability of mutual solutions would decrease. First of all personal interests must be exalted for the idea of mutual solutions would work, not group interests, personal interests. And then, for the sake of the improvement of their prosperity, people should have something to go back to and grow. That has enabled immense power of humanity to be harnessed and made things possible. Denial of that would violate mutual trusts and interests we have for each other, plus our reward

Absolute profit is impossible, yes I still get by to that. It means that no matter how much you have solved other people's problems, you would never "deserve" more than what others "deserve" from you. This also considering inclinations as individuals. This seemed to be contrary to my other proposed notion that "Everybody deserve everything", well it is actually not... because zero is not profit. But let me elaborate more on that: The Idea of justice is that everybody deserve everything they want and need, but since we are limited in terms of solutions, justice is also improvements towards there. Why everybody deserve everything? One strong reason for that is that we are not born out of our own decision, we are dragged into existence not on our own will, therefore it is only fair that we should like it. Ok, I have posts that have elaborated some of the issues with the idea in this blog, please check them out if you will but now lets explore furthe

As I talked about in the previous post, most guys have innate tendencies to fight. And there are multiple benefits to this, some might not as obvious as the others. It is intuitive for guys who have experienced many fights to identify "the lines". There are lines that if crossed would reasonably lead to conflict. How intense would the conflict be, also have levels of lines. If you just look at it from the outside, your subconscious wouldn't get the feel to it... you might be able to rationalize it to a certain degree, but know that your subconscious too could contribute to the understanding. Such know and feel are pretty common among guys, but it doesn't mean that it is a privilege that should not be applied to everybody. It should because it is real and archetypal. Let's say your kids often create a ruckus messing with other kids' toys and being physically annoying. It is so obvious to guys that there is no tolerance for causing problems for other people.

Google searched it in July 2020:  https://www.google.com/search?q=the+guardian+crime+in+video+games&rlz=1C1CHBF_idID854ID854&oq=the+guardian+crime+in+video+games&aqs=chrome..69i57j33.7267j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 I saw this article and asked myself, can this issue be answered using the point of view of inclinations? Well if I used the point of view of inclinations then the answer would be in agreement with it. The crimes committed in video games are bad/unethical and the characters in the video games are actually living beings since they are self-preserving, and very alive since they use means of self-communication to self-preserve. Realizing this I say, damn... this is not good. Because I know it in my heart that the thing is ok, it is not a crime, it is the opposite of a crime, it is good information, a simulation. Now, what makes us feel that it is fine to simulate? What constitutes reality vs simulations? Are the characters in video games that are