Melki Hassa's Blog

So Justice laundering is when those who haven't achieved justice yet acquired it indirectly. For example the COVID medical staffs were ended up benefiting from the betterment of the technology of medicine, now they had the knowledge and probably the tools to do their job better than before the pandemic. Another example would be due to the development of cities, more infrastructures were built. People in the past might be troubled with their environment being destroyed, but now a lot of people had access to health care system, long distance transportation, the market, etc.  A type of Justice Laundering is problematic for example money that were acquired through illegal ventures were distributed to underpaid public officials, or heroes of the community. Overpriced food were distributed to underpaid farmers, etc. Corruption, deceptive practices, scams, some of the proceeds went to people who created the solutions popularly used but weren't benefited by conventional trading in the

Referring to my previous post this is not blaming but trying to point out things that usually are not being checked.  A leader might think that he's in control of his subordinates but there's a side where the subordinates are the ones in control of him. The motive is to have a strong and stable hierarchy so that they could have a stable income. However when they feed the boss with so much ego that he became so difficult and so political, that's a sign that he has lost individual self.  Because a hierarchy of society is not higher than the Truth, the Truth is accessible and equally as intense in all layers of society from the top to the bottom. The spirit of the Truth is to permeates all fractal.  So you'd know that you'd be seeing a toxic hierarchy when: 1. The hierarchy is more important than the Truth 2. Truth at its best / purest form could only be accessed by selected few 3. It's hard to convey the Truth to other people without facing retaliation.  I might b

When a big counter momentum is hitting us, blame game is only for instant results otherwise don't. Like every action has the opposite reaction, upon every good deeds you must identify for bad inclinations I hate that the state of the world is in such a blatant crisis, but it must be the cost of our achievements that have exceeded historical expectations. We shouldn't let negative emotions overwhelmed us, we shouldn't be discouraged. This time we must recover, come back even stronger with a better budget, better anticipation.  So everybody let's make things even better :)

 I think our current way of remuneration is kind of "painting the wide brush", we should separate the "always ready" element and the "particular job achievements" elements from it.  It's logical that a lot of companies already do this but I just want to point it out plus my logic that it's definitely better: Employees being there for you always ready - cost A Employees managed to finish a particular job - cost B These two have their own characteristics, variability, requirements. So bundling these two into one "Salary" would give rise to discontentment. Well of course as a human being we should negotiate, and we should negotiate with articulation and accuracy, as well as diligence or thoroughness. But, this being taken into account in general would make a difference.  --------------------- Some employees compare their salaries among themselves, the people who are always ready would be able to be understood by the people who are more into

First of all I got to say that auditing is an arduous journey it is only natural that the opinion is totally worth it. So let's have more tiers of opinions.  I think that credit institutions, government institutions requiring the best audit opinion for everybody is low key disrespectful. It is unrealistic even for an honest business to get it perfect, so for you to require your client to have the best audit opinion all the time is infuriating to me.  Let's have more tiers of Audit opinions, the best being the most comparable and reasonable, next rather unique in certain areas, next locally comparable but not globally scalable (in terms of understandability), next reasonable but "different", next "different" and unreasonable, etc etc. Like, I don't know I'm not an expert but I hope my point of view is conveyed.  So again the point is to have a greater room of understanding for we want things to be realistic and true. We want to be able to rely on the