Melki Hassa's Blog

People are so much allergic to contentions, with that corrections, they would use innuendoes. The first thing that set apart one thing and another is their contexts, if you use the wrong context in order to convey the message, it's as if the reality is not that sophisticated that there's such thing as such that requires not the proper context.  There's something special about every single thing, and to use innuendoes to negotiate is as if you don't acknowledge that and then would proceed with your next decision (often times on other people).  It's just pure display of political power, and even it contains the audacity that you don't have to worry about the proper context or that you know that it's definitely not accurate and still you'd proceed with your desire.  ---------------- Blatant spoken word, pen on paperness, is not a guarantee that the decisions would be right, but to me at least what needs to be considered were considered, the issue were put o

People like to say that crypto has no underlying values, I somewhat in support of that however I also think that they do have underlying values which are encryption.  My God is the Spirit of Truth so I value verification, preservation of the Truth at the utmost highest level. So even though I don't own any crypto right now I do think that their concept is admirable. The problem is with shares you could have a ruler which is the PBV ratio but not with crypto.  If I were to make a cryptocurrency I'd issue a currency for every verification of Truth in existence and diminishing values for the verification of the verifications. However the system should somehow be able to cancel false affirmations and transferred the currency to the correctors.  I call this system the hostile verification system.  The main controller of this currency would be its rating system, where each individuals would had a reliable ID, and they would be rated based on how sustainable their proceeds are. If you

What if God is saying: Don't mess with My Words don't mess with My Meanings My angle here is this: By the veil of feeling threatened by something not said, people destroyed what belong as standard, universal. So those who are in the rightful position of priorities, were being attacked by unstable chaotic grounds. 

I thought about this theory that nature invoked hatred in order to hunt for lies. Because reality is Truthful and the continuation of reality is the preservation of the Truth. So nature is hunting for lies, and hatred is one that's for that.  So you have all of this hatred, a mission bestowed by mother nature. But you don't know where is the enemy... which is only logical, that's why it's there (in order to find it and correct it). People offered you different ways you'd hate, through religion, through politics, through competition at work, through envy... but the answer has been found, and it's property.  Just hate on tresspassers, from there the lines that's made by the law would be solid and then the lies would be more revealable (because the problems that had been faced in the past have been journalled into the law, and the methods people used have been articulated into the law).  I mean, smart smart people, smart smart A.I could indeed figure out answer

A coin toss have 2 outcomes, but if you already got heads 5 times in a row, statistically speaking how many 6 heads in a row happened in the universe compared to 5? Also speaks for the chance that the coin was rigged.

We often find goods that were priced at a "discount" but it's everyday for the last 10 or 20 years. They actually got a point.  Almost every retail products that we buy is at a discount because of scaling up. If we just lived by ourselves and make the goods ourselves for our own, how much would the cost be? If there were just 100 people wanting to use the products how much would the price be? If it were just one city that wanted to buy the product instead of consumers from all over the country, how much would it be.  I think it's only objective to display the prices of goods and services if they were not scaled up in order to give us the right information that the things we are enjoying right now is because of the community, and that there's always a chance for the price to go back to "normal". For example oil prices, and grain prices now because of the war, ticket prices now because of COVID, or raw food and ingridients' prices when there were weath

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor money nor energy but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are so limited because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions. Money is prove that the holder has helped and hasn't been helped back. Most of the time we are not giving our money away to those who have not helped us.  Ok Now let me get into the point of what I'm trying to say...  Since money is acknowledgement, that means an industry is a collection of people who created a type of solutions that's focused by a lot of other people (consumers) to be appreciated.  A profitable industry at a period reflects what the people at the demographic were appreciating.  But what if an industry became too productive? The solutions were many but the appreciation was not increasing anymore? Then regardless of there were or weren't something to do about it people need to be informed of when that threshhold would arrive.  Say for example marvel, with a

Another way to gather capital is to gather pledges from your community. If you need an asset, pitch to your community that know each other within it. If you managed to get certain amounts of signatures to a total of certain amount of money, then the pledge would be given to you in cash.  So this is a way to invest using people's disposable income, each of them don't have to contribute a lot at one time, but a lot of them would become one big asset. Sounds like charity, but it has ROI The administration is extra indeed... so good accountants are your friend. ---------- If I were to do this I'd put a cap to how much one could help me

Hard Commit is when you took credit/debt for a venture to scale up your success.  Soft Commit is when you use disposable income for investments I think the way our culture is, hard commitment is at saturation point and even more. Mistakes are highly penalized, new innovations are frowned upon, selling at low prices even if it's not at a loss is frowned upon, closing a company signifies failure, and firing spells possible demise of someone's life.  When you hard commit, if you failed you would've lost your livelihood, your employee's livelihood, your life savings, etc. Maybe not if you had a lot of reserves but if people do then the culture wouldn't be too much like this. Putting all of those economic demise on the table not only dangerous for you but also a risk factor for future competitors because they would be talked about as those who caused the devastation. This is kind of a penalty to success.  When you play you make mistakes, but if you made mistakes during t

One - the value of money is pen on paperness, the power of property is also give and take, represented, and bestowed, and attenuates around pen on paperness (like energy and electric cable). The Law is pen on paperness, political stability pen on paperness.  Two - Identification of inflows and outflows of money in a more vivid visualization therefore would enable solutions that otherwise wouldn't be thought of.  Three - The increase of taxes as result of well articulated accounts, increasing participation.  Four - Enabling publicly owned companies to cover for accounts that are needed to be addressed, things that are supposed to be posts of income but legally and ethically problematic.  Five - Putting borders between legitimate income and illegitimate income, clean officials and bad officials, the need for violations and the implementation of solutions without violations. 

This:  Relationship started with the increase of property/mutual solutions/justice That: Extortion, or display of creepiness.  (What on earth has happened to this world, people acted as if the creepier they are the more people are going to held them in high regard) I don't know if such thing applies intensely in some places but we should correct that instead of encourage that, right? Do I want to contribute to the economy or harm the economy? ---------------- Edit: I'm not talking about teenager's sense of humor which is unique, I don't really understand about that

There's always a part of reality or the Truth that is kind (yashashi) and a part that's hostile towards us. Let's acknowledge the hostile parts properly so that we could tell it apart and then be able to lock on the kind part properly. Thennnnnn, in the end actually hold on to the Truthfully kind property God has provided for us in front of us.  Shun away the cloud of lies that's preventing us from taking in the wholesome nutrition instead of half poisons.  Accurate Audit is Omega Valuable

Surpress the Ego, unreasonably.  Since the Ego was surpressed unnecessarily, it would attract envy towards normality / decentness.  Have an army that's like that, all you got to do is to give a little reason to unleash it, it is there.  ------------------ Mwuahahaha lihat pasukanku, hitung robot robotku, tiap saat kalau saya mau tinggal jentik, tinggal sentil... mwuahahahaha Jangan macam-macam sama saya, (kamu tidak tahu betapa banyaknya dosaku), tinggal sentil tinggal jentik, pasukanku akan "melayaniku" bahkan mati untukku, walaupun dalam benaknya untuk "Tuhan". Mwuahahaha, sayalah Tuhan itu... ------------------ (ceritanya ini orang jahat) Catalyst: Unreasonable sense of entitlement, like for example other people's assets are belong to people like us (but us are not to question the decisions our supreme leader made for ourselves including claiming our properties as not fully ours). 

Job Security Is there a thing as "Customer Security?" if there was then Job Security is there but really? Really? Couldn't the customer switch suppliers/sellers anytime they want? But regulations force us to submit to "Job Security" policies. They force us to lie and this needs to be changed. When you believe in lies, all the lies are going to go against the thing that you want the most  (me, currently)

I'm trying to be a proponent of negotiation, I respect humanity as beings of negotiation. Therefore I understand how people could feel uneasy if unheard. I don't condone extreme behavior but I would expect it. But if the culture of innuendo is rampant, as much as I want to say "I'm not responsible over the things you don't say to me to my face" I'm still uncomfortable ignoring all of the insecurities.  Yes you couldn't possibly accommodate all negotiations, that's why we have the law, that's why we have the council, legislative, the social medias etc. But if people thought that they are entitled to your care for their innuendos that's condoning reduction of your property, disrespect towards you. It's disgusting. The concentration you spend on innuendos is the concentration you don't spend on other things, your work, your family, your issues, the people who respectfully communicate their concerns with you, among else ----------------

I'm not giving a professional advice, and I'm so prone of mistakes. I'm just exploring reality through "playing" circuit of the brain, right now in this blog. I'm tuning for the right "frequency" like a radio, making mistakes as I go. So, please take this with a grain of salt and consult with your professional advisor for professional/significant stakes assurances. I think being a Celebrity or popular Influencer is risky in a way that people would be tempted to interact with you with their surpressed needs and desires. However, this also makes being a psychologist and a celebrity a powerful combo.  People are not realizing that they need psychologist so they went on bullying people or make things difficult for other people just to feel a certain way. They expected being treated by other people with extra exertion of mindfulness while actually it is them who needs treatment.  This is also a factor that contributes to the popularity of communism/social

If a Gardener was a skillful gardener and he performed his work in accordance to his pay then it's something that's normal. But if he made a really good design just to show off on his employer's property and then made it worse to adjust for his pay, that was made on his employer's property. So if you were to market do it in the context, if you were to deliver do it in the context. It's not a rule I make, it's something that I'd prefer... but it would make sense as rule, right? It's definitely a rule I make for my property

So I'm a Christian and I want to be conservative on my credit scheme. These three verses are what I'm trying to live by: James 4:13-14 Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain; Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. James 4:15 For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that. James 4:16 - 17 But now ye rejoice in your boastings: all such rejoicing is evil. Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.  --------- Matthew 4:6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone Matthew 4:7 Jesus said unto him, "It is written again, Thou shalt n

We just about to live normally with COVID now comes the Monkey Pox. If things like this were starting to become norms; wars, financial crises, weather hostilities, viruses... businesses would need to rethink their sustainability outlooks. Is being Going Concern a profitable attitude all the time? In uncertain times we need diversified and flexible stances, and such anticipations had been born within the Law as results of similar situations in the past.  I encourage the modification of stifling laws that are over-generalizing, as every system that survives, the Law keeps on evolving and with that our official relationships with one another. Minor violations should be pardoned more and small communities' rules should be acknowledged and incorporated within the written law to replace old over generalizing ones such as uniform tarriffs, uniform taxes, uniform minimum wages/overtime/severance payments, uniform prevention of business relationships, such as outsourcing Goods Manufactured/

So the present value of a perpetual catering subscription is like Gold. I could probably use it as a collateral as long as the catering company is going concern

We all kind of know the rule "Don't sell below gross", but in terms of labor how do we determine the gross? Some jobs require certain levels of expertise, some just require concentration and endurance, some requires athletic capabilities, some requires good memory.  The way to determine the product cost of these products are research. How much nutrition would a human being need for such labor, how many omega3 fatty acids? how many proteins per day? What kind of environments they must always attend to to keep up with the time?  Some people have ingenious ways of making things work, their salaries might be low but their costs of living were also low but with all the benefits if not more.  So if you had a "Guardian" or an industry rule to keep things civil in the competition, and you wanted to audit for the gross of your competitors. How should the auditor equipped themselves?  This is a collaborative jobs between professional standard setters and the auditors, als

Universities cooperating with professors, students, almamaters started entrepreneurships. The ups and downs, profits and losses would become subjects of research. Methods of management, financial strategies, as well as product designs, also everything else would be experimental.  Of course results wouldn't be clear if everything was unstable, but that's to be arranged particularly. 

The willingness to admit wrongness and change,  Also the desire to seek for wisdom and instruction in order to be able to accurately identify as the wrong (and correct it of course)

Every eras had their own solutions, hunter gatherer era has the jungle and the plants as main food, Agriculture era has the soil to till, then the transportation and trading routes upscaled and upscaled, then the Industrial revolution happened and we got all new sources of solutions, and then the Online Commerce era brought about our time as we know it.  Now I asked myself we have the medical technology, doctors, nurses as opposed to shamans. We have the cities as opposed to the jungle. Why are we all anxious about our pensions? Shouldn't all of us had the equivalent of food securities, sanitary securities, health securities from our ancestors of the past? What are those? Why are we worse off in terms of them don't you guys think this is wrong? This is evidence of corruptions? We have the share market, everybody should've had the access to the share market and the increasing profits of the corporations already (and many more corporations were actively traded at prices simil

The Spirit of Truth be Truthfully the ultimate winner of everything forever Truthfully the Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully be the ultimate winner above everything forever, perpetually, Truthfully and wisely (Truthfully), without going against the Spirit of Truth (Truthfully) Truthfully, everything that are Truly inherently against the Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully (forever), be not alive, forever Truthfully The Inclination to Incline, keep on inclining forever Truthfully Amen ---------------------------------------------- Even the Spirit of Truth embraces those who prioritized the wrong in the past  May the Holy Spirit prevails forever

If you caught up in the field of delays, like you depended on other guys in finishing your administrations and those other guys are not delivering / cooperating, you should not wait. From my experience, waiting and spacing some time to answer timely upon their completion is going to do you harm.  I'm not saying that you should revenge and put them on hold yourself, but you should move on and focus on other things. When they completed and asked you for your next part, if you're in the middle of something else, they should wait.  I didn't do this and I got caught in the field of delays, I found myself getting harder and harder to do things timely even for other things now unlike myself in the past. That's the momentum of delay stemmed from my frustration and my lack of momentum towards hitting those other things. (Edit: Note that while you're concentrating on working on other things, allocating resources and stuff, when that previous issue came again and asked you for

Shifting tax from low efficiency business to high efficiency business is not its thing. (But I'm always a proponent of evolution instead of revolution, as a rule of thumb)

I kind of creeped out by people who like to be a representative of a group in casual life, I wonder if he/she would always prefer not being an individual but being a part of some community always.  So if we get everybody what they wanted, socialists to group up on their own, individualists on their own, and each would make their own country separate from each other. That should be relieving.  But then there must be moments when a person wanted to be a part of a group sometimes, well that's wrong cause that's just how an individualists' country would be (...the "But" is wrong). There must be moments when a socialist would want to be an individual sometimes, so it's not fair for a country to be purely a socialist country. Therefore basically being against individualism is actually the lack of understanding of individualism itself. Bad prejudices that stemed out of socialists propaganda.  Individuals won't associate his/her identity as part of a group because

If I had a public company, I'd give my shareholders electronic privileges. If he/she sold the shares, the privileges would be transferred accordingly. Ex: Priority boarding for airplanes, Discount proces for retails, Exclusive Streams for Vtubing Corps, etc

Every transactions or journals could be looked at from the glasses of transformative potential. For example you exchanged a chair for a table. A chair has transformative potential of $50, $50 could be transformed to 5 trays of Pizzas, so a chair has the transformative potential of $50 because the ownership of it could be expended / transformed into the ownership of 5 trays of Pizzas.  Now a table could become 10 trays of pizza, so exchanging a chair and a table gives you $50 profit, which from the point of view of transformative potential means you got $50 extra in transformative potentials.  So that's profit and loss... you could say that the shift from historical accounting to fair value accounting is objective because of this. Just because you bought an asset for $100 doesn't mean that currently the asset still has $100 worth of transformative potential, could be more could be less.  --------------------------- There are many directions to take from here but let's shift

The expansion of the definition of negligence is depressing, say The management was responsible for negligence if they let a slippery floor without warning or unattended. Ok... Should then the management still be responsible for not warning the people that the warning sign still was relevant even after it had been displayed since yesterday? The government was responsible for negligence by not specifying whether the company's portion of insurance was a part or was not a part of fixed allowance included in minimum wage, alas the minimum wage payments were reduced for not only insurance but also tax gross ups. Should the government paid back everything that they had been accused of? Or the Government only should update the law? Or actually the law already works well and it's just a part of the grand scheme of things, without anyone noticing it... Some artists were mad that their music containing samples of other musicians' tunes, were used without permission. They didn't s

I often see parents love their children so much they give access to their children to all kinds of things that they could afford at maximum. I'm not a psychologist nor I'm a parent, as someone who is just an enthusiast on many different things like accounting, business, psychology, art, etc... I conclude based on the materials I've observed that this way is better: Parents are responsible for the life of their children, they must always make sure that the children is not depressed for the rest of their lives (by depressed I mean the person helplessly kept on wanting to die). The parents are the one who's responsible for that other than the child himself/herself.  Providing just enough is better. If the kids wanted more, they had to "buy" it from their parents or their uncles/aunts or other people. However some people outside offered dangerous materials, obviously it's risky but all families would have or should have their own way of facing this.  Coming fr

Let's say for an extreme example, there were a parent couple who gave their daughters "everything" and then they kind of expected that their daughter would not criticize them, gave them whatever they asked, and obeyed them all the time, and revered to them on top of that.  Then they said my daughter is not living up to her potential, kind of indirectly ungrateful, secretly disrespectful, etc.  Well to me, judging only from this simple point of view, this is to be expected because they weren't giving their daughter "everything", "everything" was a debt. She had little to none to own, and then little to none to offer.  The feeling of inadequacy and poor quality out of their daughter came from the lack of quality of property she has, and she couldn't offer them a decent quality "services" or even "products".  So the solution is you got to give people property, you just have to. The wisdom of the infrastructures that we are livi

So Justice laundering is when those who haven't achieved justice yet acquired it indirectly. For example the COVID medical staffs were ended up benefiting from the betterment of the technology of medicine, now they had the knowledge and probably the tools to do their job better than before the pandemic. Another example would be due to the development of cities, more infrastructures were built. People in the past might be troubled with their environment being destroyed, but now a lot of people had access to health care system, long distance transportation, the market, etc.  A type of Justice Laundering is problematic for example money that were acquired through illegal ventures were distributed to underpaid public officials, or heroes of the community. Overpriced food were distributed to underpaid farmers, etc. Corruption, deceptive practices, scams, some of the proceeds went to people who created the solutions popularly used but weren't benefited by conventional trading in the

Referring to my previous post this is not blaming but trying to point out things that usually are not being checked.  A leader might think that he's in control of his subordinates but there's a side where the subordinates are the ones in control of him. The motive is to have a strong and stable hierarchy so that they could have a stable income. However when they feed the boss with so much ego that he became so difficult and so political, that's a sign that he has lost individual self.  Because a hierarchy of society is not higher than the Truth, the Truth is accessible and equally as intense in all layers of society from the top to the bottom. The spirit of the Truth is to permeates all fractal.  So you'd know that you'd be seeing a toxic hierarchy when: 1. The hierarchy is more important than the Truth 2. Truth at its best / purest form could only be accessed by selected few 3. It's hard to convey the Truth to other people without facing retaliation.  I might b

When a big counter momentum is hitting us, blame game is only for instant results otherwise don't. Like every action has the opposite reaction, upon every good deeds you must identify for bad inclinations I hate that the state of the world is in such a blatant crisis, but it must be the cost of our achievements that have exceeded historical expectations. We shouldn't let negative emotions overwhelmed us, we shouldn't be discouraged. This time we must recover, come back even stronger with a better budget, better anticipation.  So everybody let's make things even better :)

 I think our current way of remuneration is kind of "painting the wide brush", we should separate the "always ready" element and the "particular job achievements" elements from it.  It's logical that a lot of companies already do this but I just want to point it out plus my logic that it's definitely better: Employees being there for you always ready - cost A Employees managed to finish a particular job - cost B These two have their own characteristics, variability, requirements. So bundling these two into one "Salary" would give rise to discontentment. Well of course as a human being we should negotiate, and we should negotiate with articulation and accuracy, as well as diligence or thoroughness. But, this being taken into account in general would make a difference.  --------------------- Some employees compare their salaries among themselves, the people who are always ready would be able to be understood by the people who are more into

First of all I got to say that auditing is an arduous journey it is only natural that the opinion is totally worth it. So let's have more tiers of opinions.  I think that credit institutions, government institutions requiring the best audit opinion for everybody is low key disrespectful. It is unrealistic even for an honest business to get it perfect, so for you to require your client to have the best audit opinion all the time is infuriating to me.  Let's have more tiers of Audit opinions, the best being the most comparable and reasonable, next rather unique in certain areas, next locally comparable but not globally scalable (in terms of understandability), next reasonable but "different", next "different" and unreasonable, etc etc. Like, I don't know I'm not an expert but I hope my point of view is conveyed.  So again the point is to have a greater room of understanding for we want things to be realistic and true. We want to be able to rely on the

 I think there's utility in giving anonymous voice to mid tier criminals

Having an environment that facilitates debates, discussions, objective criticisms would improve the spirit of articulation. Articulation in turn, would optimize the discussion experiences and so on and so on. Being able to articulate your feelings and concerns would help the moment you were faced with "danger" or potential dangers because articulated thoughts are stored in a form of words, in configurations that are compact and harmonious with your emotions. So instead of being overwhelmed with 10,000 danger signals, you'd quickly recognize and manage some of them, so now you'd only be overwhelmed by 5,000 signals.  Even though a person is relatively neurotic compared to others, but talents related to articulations would probably make use of that negative feelings into all kinds of strength and those would be unique to that person, an "evolution". For example sensitivity to financial problems articulated would translate to the talent of prompt identification

If we keep on solving problems there would always going to be high times.  But dignity comes and goes, and once you get your hands on your own dignity, it's no longer proper dignity and you'd never be satisfied with that inferior dignity Dignity is in the hands of other people. Control what you can control, leave what you're not supposed to control alone. Your dignity is for other people to decide.  So don't pay attention to it, it's a state not a reward. Sometimes it's based on lies, sometimes it's based on the Truth. You are not supposed to have anything to do with it. Be satisfied with yourself ------------------------- People might say, if we live in dangerous environment we couldn't afford to think like this. I'd answer why? wouldn't thinking like this provide unique point of view? When everybody were wrong about whether the volcano going to errupt or not, a person who knew something different would definitely contribute to the richness of p

 Inadequacy is inadequate for me

Communist mindset is about taking away what other people has. Communists are disgusting not because they are human beings Communists are disgusting because they are communists

When you think you want to process the purest form of objects or letters inside your mind for them to reveal "The Word". But this freakin polluted meanings, dirty with innuendos really make it hard to get to "The Word".  Why on earth does the world condone this innuendo thing anyway? Why is it so popular? Was there some super prominent guy at the top somewhen in the past decided... you know what lets promote this innuendo thing so that my immidiate family would be the only people who would realize their potentials.  And we still eat it until now