Melki Hassa's Blog

Starting with Logic, Logic is interwoven with the Truth. Through the truth manifests Logic and through Logic manifests the Truth.  When comes to Logic we talk about what's true and what is not. One and Zero in programming, 1 0 That is currently how I see it, so... The truth is the protocol that everything follows that there's only one true past. What is true in the truth? True in this sense is that there's only one past that is true. What is true within the true truth?  That there is only one true past. What is true within the true of the true Truth? ONE True Past... the Truth. Therefore our sense of the truth relies on the existence of extra protocols, or the hierarchy of protocols, and the existence of the wrong order, which is the wrong protocols, or the not protocols.  Hence the manifestation of Accuracy in Logic.  Could there be the inclination to keep on inclining to not incline forever? Should be, but it is not in presence... it is NOT in presence.  

So I tried something and it worked a bit, to experience dreaming while I'm awake. What I did was... sometimes when you're doing nothing in your bed, you closed your eyes, you saw a little glimpse of image. I think we all have that, a pre-dream. So I remembered that image and while still closing my eyes, I keep on picturing it, zooming in, or moving it around so that I could see it from a different angle, zooming in, zooming in. And then let it go... don't try to control what happened, don't audit, or criticize, just experience... and that's when I saw things that's dreamy. Different environments, different objects, weird physics, random locations at a time.  So when you focus, you don't focus like focusing on work. You use every focus you have but that ... So to make it happen, try it when you have nothing else to worry about or interested about thinking. Just feel like sleeping, that's it. And as soon as the picture/object appeared, remember it.  Edit:

Power have different types, those that I could identify are: Force and Barrier.  Force, is the kind of power to reduce the government's potential for income tax from the target... jk I mean, it is for reducing the target's Economic potentials and advantages.  Barrier, its property or "safe space" where the power is used to prevent debilitating influences from hindering one's growth Converting one to substitute for another is costly, so if you want to focus on force you'd sacrifice the quality of your barrier. Its going to take more power to build it up again to the same quality as before, even if the target was reduced to nothing. And there would be other exposures as well according to the situation.  A barrier is reinforced by positive results of negotiations. Instead of focusing on force, it would be more resource efficient to improve your proficiency in using negotiation technologies such as the law, the media, the internet, etc. 

You know, I think small towns or village areas have this potential: Big advanced cities such as New York, Tokyo, Sydney, Seoul, etc are built over mistakes. They are products of evolution. But the formula they have now isn't incorporating those past mistakes anymore. So if you build your community, your businesses, your town over those formulas... you would get all the advancements with little dealing with all the mistakes. I'm saying it should be possible within 10 or 20 years to have that quality of a city if people started from scratch.  Obviously the clear example of this are what the Chinese people managed to accomplish. They grew at incredible rate for this past 20 years, recreated their whole country into an advanced economy. That's because they've utilized the good and not having to deal with all the bad.  However, if you do this and you've reached the full potential of the formula. Then you got to deal with new mistakes. Now you are at the forefront of the

I wonder why some countries with frequent use of drugs is wealthy like the Netherlands and some others are not as wealthy. Do all illegal drugs really has debilitating effects on people's mental health or some aren't? But this is I'm sure, that if you created laws that were frequently violated by the people, in other words, you put the people in the position that's always against the written law. Then this is a case of conflicting or contradicting infrastructures of the relationships between people.  People would always have this mindset that one should be disregarded over the other, written laws or customs. I mean if the customs were really bad then the written laws should win, if the written laws were bad, yes there are some, then customs should win. It is easy when it is obvious, but when it is not... its like telling/treating a kid who has gay (oldschool and newschool gay) tendencies that he was not a good person.  Now, the more people are being put in that situatio