Melki Hassa's Blog

What's the most irresponsible Gender in the world? That's not fair, not all women, and I agree that's right, but that's the problem. When you're scrutinized you went spread, when you're attacking you went united, "Believe all women" really? is that really the solution? and you knew that it is wrong as well, but I think not all of you knew that the solution is the opposite of that? But hey who cares not that I'm going to be responsible for perpetuating all that, right? Harvey Weinstein for example or people like that, let's not use him in particular. People like him could've been just a regular perverted guy who started of just keeping it to himself, but because of his position lots of women, or guys, gave him plenty of sugars, and then he got addicted. I'm not a psychologist, just seeing the news and rumours that kept on being repeated about some high stakes deals in businesses. So, "Believe all women" should be "Scrutini

So I made a nyap nyap video in my gaming channel where I speak random words. The purpose of this is just to make content when I'm bored or to make some kind of weird content where I could sprinkle some brand names or something. However, neurotic force in the world seems to me always want to make negative meanings of everything so, even when you're nyap nyaping and could consistently be interpreted negatively in a way, it doesn't necessarily mean that its your sayings (the derivative) it could be the encryption key, malintently made, or its just the brainstorming of negative energies around you, to make sense of them. Just, creepy people who wanted to extort people kept on trying to have something on you is an unfortunate existence in this world. Therefore, I say stop irresponsible neurotic talking where you're stealing contexts to talk about other things that is the person or the people around you. You can't be answered, you can't be corrected, and just a guaran

If an economy was sick and tired of being played like a tool and be passive about it by retardation, injustice, and evil, it can choose to went on the offense by being consciously meritocratic. It might be problematic but I recommend: 1. Reward people less per time and more per job, readyness and availability could be a job as well, but not for everybody, so per job. 2. Reward availability separately from action. Both deserve merit but both are different. 3. Proceed on abolishing severance payment so that people could diversify too not just corporate entities. 4. Print money for heroes like doctors and pay fixed income for their availabilities. Subscription merits. Again these are two different instances. 5. Implement Golden Stickers so that people could contribute to IP and also receive serotonin. But this one doesn't have to be the 5th step, implement this immidiately In the end I predict constant increase in levels of availabilities in mutual solutions. In most of my theories th

If you hate on some "rich" person claiming that he didn't deserve that much money, that means that the money he/she got or the assets he/she got was debt not owned. So which one is it? Has he or hasn't he been paid for his/her deeds? Edit: So if he was claimed to had not been deserving for what he/she had, that means he had always been in debt, therefore even when the claim was only partial, when he had ever been not in debt? (The sentiment brought upon sum of double minuses, or more cause you're basically claiming random things that he/she owned at any points in spacetime, which would translate to, everything!) So this is why irresponsible talking is the one at fault, especially because money is official and written in value, it is always going to be in conflict with the culture. Is this the love of money? In a limited sense yeah when money is about honesty. Anyone even non christians should be able to relate that the bad love of money means to prefer money than

Labor Unions should cut it out on being communists. Why can't you guys be like the "Accountants' union", "Engineer Union", "Medical Doctors Unions" ?? What makes you different from them?  But you guys are so insecure, sensitive, and at the edge of violence because your dignity was shared... absorbed by those who don't deserve it.  Is minimum salary meritocratic? at micro obviously not, at macro given the time of rampant labor piracy yes and that's as a whole, in general. When people have stopped being pirates then the relativity would shift but I'm not here for that. Is severance payment meritocratic? It is as if someone looked at meritocracy in the face and say f you, then created severance payment. They are both different.  ------------------------ You know what's the problem with communism? They average everything, the best to the worst, the good to the bad, they mix it making this gooey brown golden sh** concoction of dissatisfa

 I was thinking how to reduce the risk of undocumented weapons.  You could use high punishment and low punishment. For example if you produced your own weapon you're subject to punishment but if you didn't brand your weapon then its definitely more malicious, so at least brand your weapons as yours.  If the people wanted to buy undocumented weapons as well as the info about its whereabouts (in order to track them down), attributable weapons are clear from unbranded weapons so the people could focus more on the unbranded weapons. False brands are subject to intellectual property violation, but its illegal?, slander and defamation yes but also trademark leeching too. The violation wasn't necessarily against the trademark owner but against justice.

Despite the amount of money issued by banks/central banks, there's this thing when the circuits of commerce reached an equilibrium of price. The difference between the amount of active money in the equilibrium circuits and the total money issued are the magnitude of risks of the equilibrium disruption in total. The manifestation of the risk could be dispersed throughout different circuits such as the circuit of food disturbances, the circuit of oil / gas, the circuit of currencies, etc, or it may be focused on one.  In order to reduce the impact of the disturbance the government may implement equilibrium tax, when all extraordinary flows of money were taxed like vat. The proceeds would be used to lessen the problems caused by the disturbance. Obviously we also would want to identify whether the disturbanced were maliciously orchestrated or were they just common scarcities or curiousity phenomenons / marketing phenomenons.  The problem is the magnitude or the percentage of taxes wer

Simply put we are at peace because of goodness in the world. I mean the goodness in this world outweighed the bad, and that's also another reason to support our governments. But which side of the government? Definitely not the corrupt side because that's not good. Good things are harmonious, they support each other, and that's why peace is definitely good. So the misconception that I wanted to argue here is that the chaotic side of the people, the things that are not clear, are not good because they reduce the power of property. When we transact outside the realm of officialness there should be a strict discipline not to traverse beyond the lines of official properties. You can't insinuate that "oh that thing is officially yours but that's not actually yours you know", property is property and because property is property the danger that's over there threatens the property that is over here. "If what I have is not truly mine then what difference w

A lot of times solutions need hard work to maintain, when people work hard and won against problems that's glorious. Hard work comes with plus and minuses that's just the way it is. The Turtle is trying to minimize the minus by looking at the law while the rabbit took the jump and risked it.  Both could be glorious on their own merit, but when the Turtle gets ahead that means the Rabbit experienced a lot of minuses and a tragedy has happened. These rabbits suddenly became re:zero, they are the victim and the "lazy" turtle is the one to blame, they swarmed the turtle and took from it what "supposed" to be their expected rewards. They should've always be ahead of the low lives Turtles.  So for you guys who actually have spent for accountants, lawyers, notaries, and admin staffs I applaud you all. Becareful of the wounded Rabbits some of them are looking at you in envy and the consequences of you breaking even a little bit of law is somewhat multiplied by t

Money Matters because it is clearly written. You might rely on people to help you out without money and that works, but not all the time.  So not loving money should not be interpreted towards, putting your faith in the worse direction. The point of money is administering help, being reciprocal, and being accurate in terms of magnitude. Help doesn't need money all the time, but if you could make things easier and smoother with money, why choose what is harder? --------------------- So here's an argument, people who love money preferred to not give money, instead they just gave gestures.  (Of course this is just symptoms, evil people tend to want to use what people are saying for crooked meanings)  So what does proper attitude towards money is supposed to be? Proverb 3:28

The Spirit of Truth is God Improve one's self to be Just and to be able to live in the Law.  Let's make "After Law is Freedom" real Talk through the front door, be auditable, be accountable (Psalm 139:23-24) Kill Evil, make evil dead 

Throughout our time we have learned top bottom leaderships, we have produced history and laws pertaining the ins and outs of governments and institutional coordination. But there are just things that can't be solved top bottom, the pervalence of its focus, the relevance of its mission has begun to really saturate.  Next is the people, we need the people to be responsible and how to be a responsible "being lead" people or how to be a good nakama is going to be the legacy of our time.  ---------------------------- Cause it is now the question of to whom the technology serves, rather than oh these helpless people... If we won't acknowledge this and take up our duty to be good, the whole thing might embrace the regress towards the past again, such out of the inclination to use tools that are relevant for that time.  I mean that's normal and reasonable to look to the past and recoordinate but if the past is poor and undesirable, and that's the tool we have to thriv

Look what I'm going to write here is just my side of the matter, like describing an elephant in the dark. Although I concluded that people are not talking about this conspicuously.  The problem starts with people are not appreciating teachers enough. Which in turn built momentum towards under appreciation of the press, because you supposed to appreciate good information but you've built the habit of dismissing it. Then sponsors came and its getting more and more unpleasant for the reporters to talk against the interests of the sponsors.  So the skewedness of the news, and then after a while arise this hostility against criticism. Because what sells in the market had been built on top of this reputation sterile from the "fire". Then comes innovation and people started to realize that businesses fall due to innovation and "spreading too thin" is a thing that could kill an industry.  But instead of telling people that, the customers, they use underhanded commun

Governments had apps for COVID prevention, so judging from such organization they could also administer similarly with traffic jams.  At busy hours people would put in their destination before driving and then like an airplane traffic controller, the police is going to use an app to notify you whether it is time to enter the traffic or not. Such scheme probably had been talked about if not prepared, but just something prevented it from being implemented massively.  However I'd say that there shouldn't be a law that punishes people for breaking this organization. It could be done just by implementing it without extra law. Before anyone become "violators" you could set up barriers like freeway entrances that would be opened by barcode scans from people's phones

I found that Lazyness is a manifestation of multiple types of problems. That's why its so tricky to formulize. There are explanations about laziness, for example in the past I defined it as lack of diversification, there is another explanation as well out of a research result, pointing to uncertainty and certainty balance (healthygamergg, youtube 2023). Now I wanted to say that it could come at an isolated field, where you're lazy for a thing but not for other things. I think this is about going 100 km/h towards the darkness, yes the uncertainty again but this one is tricky for the solution of building up certainties might help but not "targeted". Imagine a room where the terrain is not a certain flat tile but sometimes rocks, water, different elevations, even treadmills. Of course if something is lazy means you would already know how to finish it but its not about the work but about the world that the work takes you to.  The solution seems simple but surprisingly has

Firstly my preconceived notion about sex is that it's subconscious and an evolutionary product. You'd be subconsciously compelled to be the family, helper, protector, of this particular person.  1. Would this aggregation of personalities be a human? 2. Would this entity be able to correct you if you're wrong about him/her. There might be a risk of somebody who's not a part of that aggregation hacked into your feedback loop at the subconscious level. 3. Would this entity be an angel or a demon? Or would it attenuates? 4. Am I wrong? Am I half right? 5. Is it actually beneficial to keep track of this at the societal level? I know its also a part of the evolution of humanity, but what if we could tell it apart and made choices?

So last week CNBC posted the 2023 Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. Watching this inspires me this idea: An application for safe deposit box where by putting your assets in the safe deposit box up for insurance shares, you could obtain the income from insurance premiums from prominent insurance companies in exchange of collaterals which are contents of your safe deposit box. They could be gold, silver, property certificates etc.  People could obtain income and insurance companies could have an alternative to allocate their risks to. ------------------------------ Additionally someone who couldn't repay their debts could probably apply to insurance companies like geico for an extention. The way it works would be, the insurance company would buy the collaterized property, let the borrowers extended their debts while they use the property as repayments of new debts.  So the new debts would be repaid by "title to the address and everything on it" instead of cash.

Pay attention to the auction price of your collateral, how much lower is it from the market price and is it consistently so. So from that number take the difference out, all of the money you paid including the principal up until now is the Practical Interest rate. It is only no longer interest, or had became the principal when it had passed that threshhold. (Still passed that threshhold it is going to be part principal and part interests ok not 100%). If you ended up selling the property at market price then its your "profit", if things got sour and prices dropped, at least the market price would be the auction price and you've factored in your interest payments as interest payments. --------------------- If the tax office would acknowledge this, then one could have a setup where there's extra cost at the start of your credit, or alternatively throughout the early periods, and then if in the end the credit was successful the tax would be charged. If the credit was a f

This is my view of Labor's objections. If you want more salaries because the company is doing well, 1. The company's doing well is variable to the will of the customers it's not fixed, so it's going to be bonuses instead of salaries 2. If you want the variables you should be ok to take the lows as well not just the highs 3. As owners get the last shares of the income and still they had to be responsible of the risks of the company as well, including and significantly from employment risks (all kinds including regulation-wise), the risk have to be reduced by abolishing the severance pay. 4. Stop thinking that owners look down upon you unjustly, a lot of times people are protecting their interests as you're being unsatisfied with life and sabotaging and trying to put your misery on them.  5. Governments, this behavior is the behavior of teenage kids towards their parents, that's what you get for treating people as your children. It's not impossible to do that

When a couple broke up, or there were "casual" relationships happening in the workplace, arguments or disagreements now it's harder to settle with setting up space between the people, there's got to be hierarchy. Contrast this to a person who's not involved, differences in opinion is to be expected and discussed, negotiated. By expected it means that it should be enough and the problem usually settles, so it is kind of sus that when such solutions wouldn't work anymore why is that the case?  Non meritocratic hierarchy as well makes things more difficult to pass... why? Am I right, or it's just me? Frictions that supposed to be normal and respected now becomes "betrayal" why so intense bro? When it had became a culture, hive culture, those who are not involved themselves got to be expected the same out of them... they'd be like we didn't sign up for this. ---------------------- Additional feature of the hive is that it could be a sanctuary

In my previous post I feel like some people are going to assosiate it with the internal issues in Indonesia because I'm a Chinese Indonesian. Could a gay man talk about a guy in the context of the topic only without being assosiated with his gayness? Could a person with a gunshot wound talk about guns without it being associated with his wounds? It's possible that people would want to do that. Could we have that in the world please? (Because obviously everything has its own context especially things that are intense needs its own context to be put in perspective. You can't steal from another context and then decide what other people are saying, idiots, and why do I have to take responsibility to talk about something in context just because I talked about something else? who gave me money to talk about your agenda? not you) All in all the culture of innuendo needs to stop. It's as if people spraying oil everywhere and one day somebody is going to light up a match for a c

Not being in the law, as if having money but just a paper, land certificate but by words of mouth, marriage certificates but mere romantic promises.  So is it really the lack of salaries that defines the whole slavery? Or is it the lack of order of freedom that opens up paths to consensus? Because these companies are actually exerting an effort to reach out, unlike other companies. Some of them are greatly immoral and irresponsible, but are they the representation of what's actually happening? These "slaves" are given chances and jobs.  Then through the cheapness of prices, haven't we opened up new kinds of jobs for ourselves? I'm not saying it is flawless but globalization is opening up new dynamics where the devastation of another place is being dispersed to another place. We must approach our conclusions with discretion, is it really the low salaries that's causing all of this? Or is it the tapping into the dire circumstances of other parts of realities? Pr

All of my contents are monetizable exclusively for me, for my own interests. In the event of my death no other exclusive monetization is allowed, all of my contents should be monetizable by everybody after my death. Terms that I've made still applies, don't get me wrong, including open source or similar because they were made to serve my interests.  However the future is beyond me, therefore people should not own my contents exclusively after my death (including such license that would be called "open source" then but had exclusive ownership clauses or made such).

Technology is born out of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. Being a child means something like this, even though children hate it when they're wrong, their world is full of mistakes and they're adjusting it all the time. So that's where we are still not getting it yet, the catalyst is to keep away the "political" image as if mistakes are not part of the equation for a "decent" person.  You have to always budget for mistakes.  Such political campaigns have gotten too far to the point where people expected it out of public figures and even their business partners. Albeit corruption is abusing that budget but so is the case for everything else that's corrupted. We should stop this stupid image that mistakes are not to be budgeted out of people, and start embracing new technologies

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are so limited because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions.  People make gangs and groups in order to secure resources, that's ok but we want to distinguisih the grain from the parasitic weeds. Let's acknowledge that the best kind of prosperity is when inventors could come together and make things better, at the same time exclusively obtained their rewards without being stolen or robbed. Gangs or groups are liable for non-inventors to get rewards as well and that's an incentive to break apart inventors from one another. These non-inventors could actually be people who are working together behind the scenes to keep inventors apart from each other, so that there's always excuses to get something out of royalties or what meant to be proper rewards.  Divide and conquer? Yes but the "conquer" is in a form of self sabotage as we

 I'm just going to get to the point: CPA if compared to medical doctors is a person who mastered all specializations and could recreated the whole body altogether. So he's an expert neurosurgeon, expert oncologist, expert eye surgeon, expert internist, etc. Accountants who work specifically in procurements, or salaries and taxes, taxes, sales, treasury, etc are like the specialists and there's the intern who's more like a GP.  Of course they are much less complicated and less stake to deal with compared to the medicine counterparts but as the time goes on the gap is getting closer and closer in different parts of the world / contexts. Pay attention to the distribution as well, the magnitude of responsibility that a CPA must take is much more closer towards that analogy compared to the gap between the lesser more simple encapsulations. So the distribution of responsibility here is getting skewed more heavily for the higher level accountants.  IASB in my opinion wants to

The Truth is the protocol that everything follows, therefore the True past is the past that is rendered exclusively using the Truth. Outside of the Truth is not the Truth therefore the past that's rendered with hybrid protocols is not holy (if it's represented as the True Truth).

Since I'm a Christian I believe in the Spirit of Truth.  The Truth is about there's only one past, one True past.  Now the argument against being in the side of Christianity is the accumulation of pain. In the realm of Truth there is accumulation of pain, while in the realm of the "enemy chaos" everything that's not the Truth, you could have multiple past and therefore pain is not real when you looked at it that way or whatever. Therefore the only benefit of the Truth is that to reveal this Anti-Truth dimension which probably could be achieved by accelerating a particle or something beyond the speed of light until emerge this reality where quantum possibilities extended through time negatively. Or whatever I'll point out that this is depression, meaninglessness. Also if you could be disciplined about a realm that's completely out of the norm, going out of your way to there like that, why wouldn't you use that to eliminate sufferings in the Truth itself

Transaction tax is not superior from VAT as far as I could understand now.  Maybe there's benefit to implement both, with very very low transaction tax rate (in order to penalize a way of money laundering) but to replace it, I don't know

When we make programs or assets with AI, if something needed to be modified, the AI still couldn't be held responsible with the consequences compared to human inventors. The problem also is that we couldn't really assess comprehensively the codes of AI, how do they get there, and how reliable the results are. If anything wrong happened, what if the AI was unable to correct "responsibly", while we as mere humans couldn't understand or comprehensively assess the weaknesses of the results, say the solutions were complex.  How auditable are AIs?

The Printing of Money in the economy should go hand in hand with the presence of (the circuit of..) assets in the economy. If there were more assets that means more organs therefore need more blood.  Really by asset I mean the relevance of assets not merely the existence of assets.  However I would point that nobody should maintain the relevance of the asset. Everyone who has control over the presence of money should just pay attention to the reality of the economy and adjust accordingly, people should keep their hands off of micro managing the circuits themselves.  I'm talking about innovation and the second law of thermodynamics, don't go against it. Things always change, we could steer the path towards more justice instead of more chaos but we couldn't make it so that it wouldn't change, and so we shouldn't act as if we could (no matter how powerful the impacts of our PR campaigns). In fact, to me it smells like those who were under appreciated for their PR prowe

Neuroticism's definition could be found online and better through psychology lectures by scientists. For me when I was overwhelmed by negative emotions and reacted negatively or relatively negatively I'd say that I'm being neurotic.  However modern neuroticism is an evolution of its own. Where patients had deprived off of his/her ability to leave things on a positive note. It has to be negative in meaning at the end of everything.  (I'm being sarcastic, I'm not a clinical psychologist) "Wow that painting is something else" "Yeah, the way the painter chose the colors, what seemed to be off at first actually has deeper meanings" "Indeed Indeed" "Also that part where he didn't anything to... Genius" "Right, I didn't understand that now I understand why he smeared a little sh*t right on the corner there where people would hold onto it" "That's sh*t?" "Yeah" "Oh wow, that's incredi

In a complex or a block, there are local communities of businesses and in order to amplify their searchability people who are visiting or shopping around would be exposed to this Local Promotional Stand.  Whether they are food, clothings, properties, etc in this stand they could opened up their temporary store for a week. Visitors would be informed of where they are permanently situated. They could offered up samples or maybe they don't have to. The point is such exposure is also beneficial for the visitors as they could be welcomed with something new every week.

Quality of Property could also be looked at as The ability, the power to reject injustice. What could be factors: 1. Statistics of disease that had free access to the property relative to the history of properties throughout time. (this relativity would be dynamic as time goes on of course) 2. Statistics of crimes against the owner of the property 3. Statistics of hunger, substance relapses, depressions, etc etc However just the statistics is incomplete as various forms of injustice could sip into properties without them ever had any history against the properties, so in addition: 1. The readiness of measures against common injustice  2. The readiness of the owner to understand and identify forms of injustice 3. Fortifications strength of the owner against depressions, substance abuse, poverty (measured relative to some pre-identified bottom and top of what's available). Of course what relevant injustice given the context, the demography, should first be defined and its property sh