Melki Hassa's Blog

This is my writing in the comment section, I put a lot of thoughts in this so I want to put it here as well: I have thought about the solution that should work. But it's rather long so please bear with me: I co-managed a small consulting business, and there comes a time when there are more potential customers than we can handle. So I should make a decision on what project should we jumped into. What I looked for in a person or a company is their propensity to appreciate, or their willingness to give thanks. If there were 2 future clients with similar offerings but one use piracy and the other doesn't use piracy, I would go on he who doesn't. Because I expect the people who don't use piracy are disciplined in creating reputation asset (a reputation that you're profitable for your stakeholders). Those who appreciate tend to be reasonable to negotiate with. Now, when you talked about competition and boycott, every single person doesn't want to be boycotted

Majalah online diterbitkan oleh Universitas: - Karena Universitas memiliki akses ke alumni dan hasil penelitian, majalah-majalah terbitan tiap fakultas universitas memiliki daya jual tersendiri. Akses ke artikel eksklusif dapat dibeli di aplikasi dan pengiklan bisa memberikan pesannya di tiap artikel yang gratis. Lampu lalu lintas mini untuk pegawai kantor: - Lampu ini bisa dipasang di belakang kursi atau di atas cubicle. Merah artinya jangan diganggu walaupun penting Kuning artinya boleh menginterupsi untuk urusan yang penting Hijau artinya terbuka untuk berdiskusi. 

After all my observant seasons, periods of my life observing people and trends happening around me. I discovered a problematic attitude that has been repeated over and over again. That attitude is the refusal to negotiate. People have limited attention spans, therefore up to this point, it's impossible to negotiate to every other living person. However, the inability to negotiate should be treated with regret and shame, not pride and a sense of legitimacy. Every time whether it's done by Christians, Muslims, Vegans, Libertarians, or even Environmentalist, sending signals that it's good to not care about what the opposition has to say always brought about serious humanitarian issues which might beat the end goal of the cause or the agenda that they are pushing. There are several angles or point of views on where I grounded the claim: 1. The backlash angle 2. The human error angle 3. The existential angle 4. The Risk of Creating persistent coercive Governmental ad

Property is a social construct, we mutually realize the importance of having properties, so the concept was invoked. Therefore property shouldn’t exist within a human being. Property exists within contracts between people. An incredibly attractive person embodies this principle. He/she treats you not as property or territory but if he/she thought you could provide him/her access to some desirable infrastructures, he/she respectfully proposed for a contract. Sometimes the proposal could be in a form of coercive gestures, kabedon for example, but a good proposal always leave the other party freedom to choose and reject. Without giving him/her further difficulties if he/she were to reject the proposal.

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions Solutions are unlimited but we are not rich enough because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions x1.y1 + x2.y2 + x3.y3 each segment is an administration that managed to solve our problems throughout our lives. The formula is about maximizing the potential of life. For each ability you have, you would give thanks to the sources of solutions in order to maximize the level of availability of mutual solutions in your reality. Administrations could be, mathematical administrations, economic administrations, security, health, management discipline like accounting, logic, moral, philosophy, biology, geology, cartography, etc. x refers to the spirit, and y refers to the human authors. You give thanks to the spirits by propagating them and made them prioritized. This usually achieved by investing in assets related to it, learning, copying, and spreading the ideas. You give than