Melki Hassa's Blog

I like to watch CNBC, Bloomberg, RT, Yahoo, IDX for financial news and talks. Not that do that often, I should do that more often but when I wanted such information those are my go to channels. With RT in particular Keiser Report, they encourage the usage of bitcoin and they trash the fiat money (regular money).  So I always said that money represents that the holder has helped and hasn't been helped back, or it should mean that. In this time of difficulty, some governments decided to take expansive policies, handing stimulus or giving out cash to people. From a point of view the policy is a relief for a lot of worries, however it is at the cost of the value of money. The same way if gold kept on being discovered or even created in a lab, then people would've wanted more of it in exchange for the same amounts of products/services they provide. Bitcoin however, from what I concluded watching the Keiser Report, is not as liable to the degeneration of value as the fiat money, I do

Firstly, I feel bad for posting the "Question is" post, so maybe this post' quality is going to be different than the others because its a "make amends" kind of post or "dodgy", but what else should I do? So, there is the negative type of motivation, like that in the "Question is" post, 2 posts before this, and of course there is the positive type of motivation. Positive types are those that have been motoring the economy mainly. If you see policies that were made for the productivity of the economy, it is always about political stability and the availability of various kinds of resources. And above all that, Justice, the core of every policies.  You might not be motivated if the place where people say you should go offered you none of your needs... but you would still help people more and more if you'd acquire money. Because with money, people would help you out in return.  You might not be experiencing the negative type of motivation if

In the time of the pandemic, a lot of people saved up their money and this might increase the dragging down of the economy, as businesses' sales will decrease and prices will also decrease below decent sustainable level of profitability.  So when people spend their money, identifiable by the transfer of VAT or PPN in Indonesia, the central bank and the banking system could acknowledge them. Something like: "Thank you, your spending has contributed to the recovery of the economy" Notifications like that should feel good, and maybe another facility like loyalty stamps, after certain amounts and/or frequencies of spending, the bank account would receive a badge. The badge facilitates the holder with the possibility of cheaper credit rates, or cheaper down payments rates. (So maybe don't instantly, universally lower the interest rates. Pick and choose, incentivize).  Maybe the loyalty stamps could apply for tax rates, or discounts at government owned businesses. And also

I was thinking about two different temperaments and how it is a bit complicated to figure out policies or set ups that should be implemented in the career world for them.  The Serenity types vs The Intimate types The Serenity types' pinnacle of life would be to not worry about things, such as poverty. The Intimate types would want to be remembered, cherished, and cared, maybe even revered to.  Having these two types together would have these implications... If you want to keep the serene people modest, you would ignore them as much as you can while they are modest. Then their motivation to become richer and more powerful would be significantly less.  If you want to keep the intimate people modest, while they are modest you cared about them, glorify their modesty, and keep giving them attention... then they'll lose a large drive to become richer.  Another way of achieving the same would be, To keep the rich and powerful people of the serene occupied, and to leave the rich and po