Melki Hassa's Blog

Today I think, God is good but He didn't fill the whole existence with goodness  Yes the Truth is the Truth and the memory of existence would always be there, ready to be mended when we have acquired the ability to retrieve them. Still, suffering is so not Godly.  However no one scrutinizes Satan. Why? Because Satan is Satan? That it is given that it's supposed to be bad? Well here I say Satan should antagonize itself, taste its own medicine. Actually it has, the fact that some bad things have been done over with, diseases eradicated, some pain has been relieved, animosities resolved, shows that Satan have been eating it's own excrements. Why not do it more and more? God is here and He is always available to be scrutinized, people do it all the time. Isn't that freedom? But the audacity of God's adversary to lie and deceive and to cause mishaps, sorrow, depression... while people glorify it as if it's the embodiment of strength. It's the embodiment of avoida

Conflict is inevitable, as the world changes or as time is time, our property changes in quality and shape constantly. Through observation of the truth and wisdom, we maintain the relevance and the power of our ownership in the face of problems that were coming. In order to draw the line of property, the line where we could scale up our assets or our freedom to maneuver reality, we use negotiation products such as culture and law, contracts and understanding of each others' resources. We learn about them, made derivatives, and plan our lives in reverence to them. In the process of establishing what's good, conflicts arise due to clashes of interests, perceptions, and understanding. Those are inevitable because the world keeps on changing.  This is where the problem lies, that people had been trying to not have conflict for a long while. That's wrong in my opinion and that's what makes conflicts more and more filled with animosity and damages. The opposite would be true

 In order to reduce the use of single use plastic for ketchup a dispenser could be put that could scan receipts of customers and associate it with their quotas (that would expire at the end of the day). So some people doesn't want too much ketchup, they don't have to take it all while those who just can't get enough would get the maximum quota allocated to the corresponding receipt.  This should also work for soda and other things such as ice cream. The aplication could also be used for vending machines at buffet. So for an all you can eat buffet there might be a combo package with some certain types of food that are bonuses or not all you can eat. For such purpose a vending machine that could recognize each receipts could be useful.  Receipts have a lot of potentials, other than those things that I've pointed they could also be useful for promotions or bonuses at other things. If there were applications that would recognize receipts, businesses could cooperate and reco

Today I think about inflation in the economy after watching/listening to Dr. Robert Shiller's interview with Nick Yekani  on Youtube.  Let's say there were 3 fruit producers in the economy, each of them has 10 fruits, apples, oranges, and pears. Each fruits worth the same, 1 could be exchanged with 1. One day there came another producer with dragon fruit into the economy, he also has 10 fruits.  Without money they traded dragon fruit 1 to 1 also, but if there were money things became complicated. Let's say they had 30$ in the economy, each dollar represents 1 fruit. Upon the entering of the 4'th producer, each dollar would represent 1.3333 fruits. So to bring the economy to the way they would do it without the money 10$ should be added into the economy, inflation.  In reality considerations are crazy more than that and the magnitude of the issue is crazy greater as well. I think what enables policy makers to stay above the water is the fractal nature of reality. If you&

For curly hairs / afro: The 60's 70's disco suits, stripes of contrasting colors, bell bottoms, draped long sleeves. For asian people: We tend to have our own good and bad colors, and would look really good on the good ones or really bad on the bad ones. T - Shirt combined with bracers like basketball bracers or tennis bracers would work really well on the right colors. Red tends to make the female stand out, some people dare not to do that but if a lot of people are doing that then it should be acceptable. The world would be more beautiful. For SEA people: Stripes of yellow on black is something that would work well. Hints of yellow or patterns of yellow on top of black. Yellow or Gold. White and brown should be good as well. Just 2 colors. If it were blue, then blue with red. Vests, army vests or non army vests. For male Javanese: I'm telling you, blankon, short trousers, shirtless... everybody should go for it. But no one's going to do that so, javanese style shirt (

Problems come seasonally, while people were in a season where everything's available and they had the option to not work, there's a need for keeping up the working momentum otherwise when the trouble times came people would have to pay a huge price to reverse inertia or whatever.  Tell them, thell them that we need to still keep up the working momentum and that everybody should allocate everyday some training times. Rather than obliging people to serious responsibilities that were not really needed, that would cause senses of entitlements that were off harmony or inappropriate. So tell us that we are training for the difficult times and that training is training and such is still some responsiblities and for so were some "extra UBI" or additional rewards (a little). 

The pandemic has brought us into a situation where the forefront of the spirit of discipline and integrity is focusing in the hospital, among the doctors and nurses, and they are hanging their lives unto it as well as everybody else's. In my opinion if companies or youngsters wanted to search/outsource for the spirit of integrity and discipline currently is the moment where it's obvious where to look.

Any kinds of organizations should be able to implement this: The wisdom department's job is to make assumptions, to compare the assumptions with reality, and to formulate explanations over the discrepancies. Each sections have their own division, so there's a separation of duties there.  The quality of the department's work is measured by how many information it could produce, through the journey of figuring out how to make better assumptions in the future, that lead to policy changes or new policies or increased confidence. For every results such as so should consitute bonuses or rewards for the employees or the members of the wisdom department.  For example if you are one of the tax collection agencies, you would make assumptions over whether or not levels of tax participation would increase or decrease after the COVID19 social subsidies by the government. The accuracy of the assumption would be compared to real data, and the reason why there was a discrepancy to the esti

Here's an argument: (I formulated it this way when I watched the 2021 Berkshire Hathaway's Shareholder meeting) If Communism doesn't work because it failed to attribute rewards to the contributors, (capitalists being those who saved up resources instead of consuming them and instead of consuming them in the future after they've accumulated, they risked it in assets or businesses to benefit the market) and communist economies failed because they won't reward the capitalists as well as not prioritizing the importance of rewards for contributors as the strong growth factor of the economy... Then in order to maintain and enhance the prosperity of an economy, a country must favor the principal of rewarding the sources of solutions respectfully.  Now, if that's the case then the welfare program, as well as the escalating rates of taxes were against this logic of what's positive for the economy. Welfares were given under the reason of poverty, not out of contributi

The real time waster is evil, the potential for misallocation of resources.  You could be sitting there doing nothing, and you'd be observing justice and injustice, so you'd be doing better than those that do some trade offs of good and bad and failed to profit good. Of course doing nothing could be evil as well of course, but it could be a wise decision as well. For some, doing a lot of those is better than the alternatives, for some it is not (unfortunately people like to over generalize). So, the real time waster is evil, just don't be evil.

As a group people tend to be more bold in doing the wrong things, as long as they are together. The guilt is not felt by the individual, but the group could feel guilty.  You see when the group culturally looks for other group's fault, by policy. Something like, as a member of the group it is virtuous to make other groups to do the same things that you guys usually do, spreading the habit. While the habit itself if were done separately would be considered as wrong/evil. It is virtuous to report to the group if one found some other guys / people and also individuals performed such things in hiding. The feeling of guilt is not there, but the symptoms of a guilty person exists for the group as a whole. When we are guilty we are more sensitive to the fault of others, in a way that we could form or find better sanctuaries from accountability.  During the pandemic we distant ourselves from our group, and we felt guilty as f**k. That's that, we need our group to unfelt that, but that&

Wisdom really separates between a robot and a sentient being.  Having all the knowledge and the processing procedure with all the speed, still a myriad of times slower than wisdom.  Absolute wisdom? Nah, but the pursuit of it Excitement Love

There are ways that our ancestors and us survived throughout time: 1. Defecating 2. Copulating 3. Lying 4. etc (but I wanted to talk around those three now) So we couldn't help but to do all those three. If only we could be free from those, but we needed them.  Therefore in order to fortify our sterileness we have the toilet, our sovereignity of our privacy and mental properties we have spouses, but in terms of the usefulness of information?  We are blessed with PvP, Sparring, and Humor The frame of it all is accountability, all parties could acknowledge, measure, comprehended to a fair extent what each other was doing at the end of the day.  Exploration of vulnerabilities, but as vaccines instead of diseases. We should keep it that way --------------------------- >Weapons... weapons are different >PvE is PvP vs the developer and/or the A.I, and/or the archetypes >If private masturbation is enough then it should be enough (I'm not sure), but lots of people need another

I like jokes that if you asked about them later to be explained, the utterers/the comics wouldn't put themselves in bad positions explaining them clearly (of course there were nuances but that's the rule of thumb).  It's like good jokes vs innuendos, they are subtle but one was explainable nicely out in the open the other you face retaliation jeopardizing your freedom in public out of being accused of as a mental hospital patient material (because you tried to asked people what they were really saying).  --------------------- Things that avoid accountability avoids it for a reason

Whim doesn't define a person, an exercised whim might be a person's responsibility, but still doesn't define a personality.  I'm not a psychologist but I concur to the idea that people's personalities are complex and unique. Unfortunately somehow the society believe that a person could be defined by their whim and that is the real person. Why? There's the third person, the auditor, the consciousness, what about those sides of a personality how about them? So if you think you are your whim, then let there be that way. I define myself as I am officially, as what I clearly said, as what I clearly declare, other than that are unofficial and most often the incomplete me.  That incomplete me might be mean, might be evil, might dictate what I wanted to do, but in the end what I did mostly not dictated by that side of me. Please human beings have the decency of bringing this brain capability to the table, please.  Stop making assumptions about people's personalities

The reciprocal sticker is my imaginary system addressing this problem: Sometimes creators/authors created the kinds of solutions that are just not worth going through the official intellectual property protection  procedures, or they were just too reluctant to go through the process. Therefore, in the mean time, why not social media companies do this: Allow Creators, Authors, Content Creators to put their mark ("sticker") in people's profile page for a tiny cost. Everytime a person contributes goods and services or money to the authors, the authors could opt to leave their sticker as a sign that the person  has been a reciprocal person.  The benefit of having these stickers in your profile page is, that they could be signs for other creators that it is a good idea to give you  easier access to their own goods and services (because you are a reciprocal person).  For the creators especially the small ones it is an extra way to get income from day to day people, instead of h

Just because you got what you deserve and others haven't, doesn't mean that you don't deserve it. Maybe you got only a fraction of what you deserve and others got the less fraction of theirs, doesn't mean that you don't deserve it all.  Just because someone didn't get as much as he deserved less than everybody else, doesn't mean that it's not evil already

In my opinion, the public should recognize adulthood as: 1. One who pledged to always prioritize justice in his/her conducts or interactions 2. Could be held responsible. Could be reasoned with. Meaning that the person has the ability to understand what rules are, and when someone was not being fair/just. So an adult is someone who has a good sense of justice always (since we are not perfect yet, we settle for common relativity for the sense of justice) ------------------------------------ Some people won't prioritize this, so they should not be allowed in public interactions. However inadequacy doesn't constitute unwillingness. So I felt it's fair to have people define their own parameters based on their own definitions of justice and reject people out of their collective properties. As long as their standards were not against the law or Justice itself. my definition of Justice: Justice is when everyone gets whatever they wanted and needed whenever they wanted or needed th

I had a conversation with my sister yesterday and I realized, I acted like I understood bullying, but I couldn't quite pin it down. What is bullying? Is it kept on doing what others disliked? But that's just friendship, or a part of friendship, or any human relationship.  Or was it doing what others clearly disliked up to a certain point of discomfort? Then is life bullying you everyday, or is it your untrained emotions? Or, is being bullied always mean being victimized, or you just got upset too easily... But then again the definition of bullying is where the problem is. Harmful bullying vs Acceptable bullying --------------- From professional definitions online, bullying is all about being harmful. So... Google searching, I should've done that before

It would be great if there was a tool (maybe with the help of A.I) to project risks in numbers and colors like the weather channel. So that people who contributed to the lowering of the risk, their contribution would be so blatant it is easier to reward them appropriately.  Currently people just tend to reward what is immidiate rather than what is wise. If risks of pandemic, wars, crimes, etc were greatly exposed to everybody, even better if we could filter local risks such as accidents or traffic jams, this would be the direction that could significantly increase the wisdom of the system including the rewarding mechanism if done well.

Why are you disciplining yourself, why are you denying your desire? When you've got what you wanted, or the worthiness of it changed, stop the discipline! Discipline must not be forever... the people you know might like you when you are disciplined, they might want what you could achieve, they might love you as a machine... but they don't love you as a self Pleasure might not be what defines you, but your pleasure is a part of yourself. Keep on denying yourself is self transforming, but why would you want to do that if you don't hate who you are? Everything has a purpose, everything that matters, physicall and spiritually.  If they don't then they'd be a part of the chaos (second law).  Why are you disciplining yourself, have you achieved what you are looking for, is it still worth it? Cause I might be witnessing a type of person who is capable of disciplining the self non-stop, a person who is just wired that way.  I'm worried... please... a person like that is

So I picked up where I left off of My Hero Academia series in Sushiroll  and I watched the duel between Deku and Bakugo, in this duel Bakugo having gone through some serious ordeal, also had been suffering from an "Empathic suffering", which has became the reason for their duel.  I'm not going to spoil the story so I'm going to continue to my own explanation of the Empathic suffering. So suffering is useful in discipline not only to burn things in your memory, but upfront sufferings are useful to give a sense of improvement to your subconscious when next being required to change to a disciplined lifestyle (otherwise you'd just feel that the discipline is a net negative for your comfort throughout time).  But sufferings don't have to be experienced directly all the time, they could be acquired through association (with pre-experienced sufferings), empathy with other people, empathy to your future self, giving thanks to your sources of solutions, etc, and of cou

I like the sound of: "A world where unpleasant words have little to no effect to the progress of Justice/Prosperity/Civilization in people" I think this angle has a lot of value to offer, given that other types of progress are queueing with businesses and workers to further the causes while this one is not.  Humor for example, Insult battles (Insulting rap battles), Gaming actually, Martial Arts, Competitive Sports, Fitness training, Forgiveness and Understanding (Communal Activities) like Support Groups, Podcasts, Psychological Therapy, Psychiatry,  Ok I see...  But, the hindrance of this... innuendos/disrespectful negotiations, lying flatteries, unjust/unfair reputational attacks Are underrated as dangerous patterns to propagate.  Should there be a law against them like other dangerous/malicious acts? Yes, but current law needs to be simplified and made more user friendly too, and that's also imperative, otherwise this would just be ignored. ----------------------- Anot

So I watched  Utada Hikaru's  conversation with Hideaki Anno (accessed June 2021), and I don't understand a lot of it, because its in Japanese. So I went to the translation video and found out that she had a deep experience with Leonardo da Vinci's St John the Baptist.  Long I have been wondering how could people experience paintings in a profound level, so I tried to search for the pictures. I didn't experience too much emotions (I experienced something at the beginning, but then its gone) but they are certainly engaging, for just thumbnails of them.  These are the ideas invoked at the experience: - They have multiple angles people could take and relate themselves to. The deeper you immerse yourself the more you could experience, but to optimize the experience you should expand yourself into the depths of the universe. The further you've been the more there it is that you could understand about them.  - Leonardo da Vinci has different versions of Jesus and John the

Privilege to me is being rich, acccess to money. But since people often use it when they were exposed to greatness I rationalize that that would be a privilege as well. But inside, I don't really get it personally. If you're a singer and Ariana Grande performed with you, I get it. But if you catch Ariana Grande on the street and took a picture with autograph, I don't get it.  Also you supposed to be able to use it to someone who won 20.000 dollars from the slot machine, but nobody says that like that. So really, is it really appropriate the way people who met with admirable people thought that they're privileged, or were they just lying / sucking up, why?  ------------------------------- I think now I've understood it better. The reason why God put the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil in the garden, and prohibited the humans from eating them is: It was a grant of privilege to become creatures of discipline. Gods, or children of God The discipline was particularly

If you believe that the world is unfair, unfair to you, you'll notice more and more how the world is unfair to you. If you believe that the world has balancing mechanism, that its supposed to be fair, you'll figure out more and more, how the world is actually serving you justice (not a law, but a development) So when the depression has passed, or has became passable, lets notice the wisdom that is calling for us to notice her

Often times people complained over working overtime or employees not wanting to work overtime while not contributing enough. Also I assume that the popular argument was that working overtime costs not only extra salary expenses but also productivity expenses in the future.  I'm all for working effective and efficiently, utilizing the working hours as much as possible. But people often stopped after the notion that working overtime is bad, but looking at it deeper, there are at least 2 divisions of reasons why it is bad: 1. Invasion of privacy. People need their own time with themselves and their family, prying on this means the business would be perceived as a negative contributor to one's quality of life even though it is also the income source of the family. Salaries are supposed to support one's quality of life, but if the expense was the quality of life itself then its about margins.  2. Specialization problem. If you worked overtime because you are doing multiple kinds

I dreamt of a title "BLUE SAGA" the font is similar to SEGA's trademark. There's a boy main character at the front, his blue hair was very long and tied in twin tails left and right, pretty unusual for a boy. He's wearing an orange basketball jersey, I didn't catch the numbers written on it. His shorts were pale blue, he was holding a stick, like a long flute but not a flute just a stick. The stick had a little metal circle at the tip, like one of those on a fishing rod... maybe it was a fishing rod, but maybe not because its also too short for a fishing rod. He was staring far away towards the far sky, cause he was staring up far in a distance. The shot or my point of view was from the floor looking at him, like I was taking his picture while laying on the floor. The sunlight was in his face but since this is an anime like picture there was no glare... behind him was blue sky with some clouds.  I knew this was one of those dreams I haven't had for a while

I believe that the presence of human beings are presence of Justice, by just being there you contributed to the interest of all of us. Maybe you were sitting outside your home with friends at night, that might have prevented a passerby being assaulted, maybe you were sleeping on the streets, you might noticed how dirty the streets are or how bad the weather has become, maybe you accompanied others who were also sleeping on the streets and improved their sense of security/company. Maybe you were talking with your friends inside a public transportation, and people who listened understood some stuffs that are important for them. Maybe you were living in an obscure place that people usually threw their trash at, now because of your presence they rethought on whether they should change their dirty habits. Maybe there are injustice happening in your city, and if it were not for your presence, people wouldn't had enough people to resisted the injustice, and because you guys resisted the p

When you've done good and at the same time you've had committed a crime as well, if you were brought to the court, the court might decide that your good deeds could cancel out with your bad deeds or a part of it. The rest of it might be forgiven through other ordeals, or payments.  Now let's say if a rapist said, my life is hard therefore I raped. Then who cares about that hardship? But if you stole something that could be paid off, the good that you've done would cover for it. If you lived in an innuendo world, as much good that you'd get out of it, that crime would keep on being there... no one's ever going to cancel it off, even if some said that you've deserved the cancel off, everyone else still think that you're indebted.  So, why not just cancel it off? Why put yourself in a mess that a heinous sinner supposed to be in? You're being a smokescreen, a tool, and the payment you received is depression or narcissism or lies that felt good together

I'm bad at dealing with sheets, bed sheets, bed cover sheets.  So, wouldn't it be better if the bed had holes at each corner and the bed sheets has rubber screws to be attached in the bed? Then make the bed sheet in the form of an opened up dice, so at the sides of the bed, the wings could be tucked in. (ok that would leave the corners opened, maybe put a zipper at each corners?). Then when it was time to wash the sheet, the rubber screws could be unattached from it, because it is mushroom shaped.  For bed cover sheet, the zipper should be all the way from the top side to the bottom side, opened it up like a book, put the bed cover in, tie it up to the sheets, and then zip it. (Ok, on the top side the zip would cause discomfort, so maybe a wing to cover it that could be buttoned? At the end of the wing you fold it inward and then button it).  

Bencana besar yang terjadi di NTT, lebih dari 160 orang meninggal dan banyak lagi masalah sangat berat lainnya, sungguh menunjukkan keterbatasan manusia dan betapa bejatnya mereka yang menghambat kemajuan manusia (mungkin saya juga termasuk di antaranya).  Dalam keadaan pasca-bencana masalah pertahanan dan keamanan manusia menjadi sesuatu yang sangat serius. Segala yang kita jalani hari demi hari tanpa berpikir, artikulasi arti dari kriminalitas, hak atas properti, menjadi luar biasa penting di sana.  Urusan kejahatan fisik itu seperti bisnis yang tak ada inovasi, kesannya, karena hasil yang kita nikmati itu tidak gembar-gembor, dan kalaupun ada penjahat yang digagalkan selalu metodenya itu-itu aja: Dilacak, dikejar, disergap. Tapi di balik itu sebenarnya teknologi yang digunakan dan kepintaran yang dibutuhkan harus terus berkembang terus menerus.  Di sinilah ada ketidak-sambungan antara investor dan venture, entah solusinya simpel atau tidak saya tidak cukup background untuk mengerti,

I've declared allegiance to The Truth and The Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully, here's another reason why this option is better: If you want to stop everything, you really have to make sure to prioritize the Truth. I know there would be no sufferings, but consider if there were a hint of lie during the stopping everything event... Imagine you were caught up in it.  Instead of ending up not feeling anything, you float around in the universe helplessly as your mind oscillated between mild sufferings to intense sufferings to forgetting about it to remember every little sufferings that everything had ever endured, sometimes time went backwards (illogical interactions) and even happiness felt like sufferings. Because people had destroyed the foundations of the universe...  So consider my allegiance, if there were some misses, we would keep on improving it as we had the foundations to kept track of it. One day, we are going to get there For the Truth and The Inclin

I always have fishy smell coming out of my mouth. And when I'm not doing keto, most often than not, I will have mouth ulcers / blistering all over my mouth. Recently I tried chewing that gastric tablet, for gastric pain, it says magnesium carbonate among others, and it works. My mouth ulcers instantly were not painful anymore, and some hours later they were noticeably healing, and the fishy smell was gone.  So I believe it was a little bit of gastric acid went up to my esophagus to my mouth. Now this really seem not to be the long term solution for it, so I should go to a doctor. If you're in pain this might help, but there might be side effects, I'm not sure I've just found out some days before. Update: So I think I got a yeast problem, and because of my low stomach acid it facilitated the pervasiveness of the infestation, so this most likely in one way or the other caused further damages to my stomach. Therefore I assume the reason why I got a big stomach and skinny e

The things that can't have Justice are Spirits that inherently against Justice.  Justice is when everybody/everyone gets whatever they wanted and needed whenever they wanted and needed it (Truthfully, forever).  Spirits in this context are Inclinations, so any Inclinations that wants to make others not get what they wanted and needed (forever, Truthfully), should not get what they wanted/needed (ever).  There we could see that the statement is not logical, simply not. But we conscious beings know what it means and it is understandable and it is not wrong. So we created terms like demons, angels, good, bad... as nuances to represent these things.  I hypothesize that the Universe gave birth to consciousness (the tree of knowledge of good and evil) in order to tackle this problem. We, conscious beings are creatures of Justice, our relationships, our existence, has became all about Justice. Our problems, our limited resources, are our journey towards the discretion. It has became our m

Sense of Responsibility is the sense to not make things worse (than the expectations). The nuance of it though when comes to dealing with wrong/untruthful expectations, breaking the illusion would give rise to the feeling of upset. But with good sense of responsibility, people will know who is not responsible for it.

I think that we are living in a world of massive regulation of speech (being applied). This limits spontaneity, appreciation of genuine personalities, and efficiency/effectiveness of communications.  Again I'm talking about innuendos. Because it is spiraling out of control already, every negative meaning that could be (unreasonably) derived out of your words will be considered valid. No matter what the grammar, no matter what your true intentions, it doesn't matter... what matters are, I mean the one who's going to be prioritized are, offended people.  Can't you see that we are catering for being offended? You said something, a generalization, just for the sake of making a point... then other people took it differently and did something bad. The current trend is to held you responsible. This would not happen if we refuse to care for innuendos.  So I ask you whoever you are, please consider this... be spontaneous, don't give a care. If you were to express something,

Why no one competes with IFRS? Why? No one can be acknowledged as an auditor if not because of them? That is too much power don't you think? Like a pile of sugar on the ground with ants just passing by Audit is a human thing, no one gets to be human (officially) if not acknowledged by them? I'm not saying they are bad people, I'm saying the situation is hen(変) big time.  XBRL accommodates the integration of multiple standards, we should have multiple standards, multiple point of views... why are we no competing with IFRS? -------------- CPA I meant the CPA for Auditors, I don't know why it slipped like that out of my thoughts. But yeah the certification business is a monopoly, even though they are just "organization" as if it is distinct from "businesses", they monopolize and monetize. Why are we not competing with these organizations? Not blaming them but a working formula is hard to renew even though there might be others that are as good. And we a

Male are Monsters, Female are Chemists When we crossed the line, we could destroy important delicate assets making things worse for other people.  When the chemists crossed the line, she could drugged another person into abandoning their reason and senses of Justice, making it worse for other people.  But the modern society is always ready to correct us from our Monster. That's our privilege

Everyone deserves everything in this world, but because of limited resources we respect thousands of years of history, of humanity's wisdom to allocate resources such as properties.  Justice is when everything that we wanted and needed is fulfilled whenever we wanted and needed it, perpetually, forever, truthfully.  However, since that's not yet, the path towards that is Justice... so to answer the question how should we share the rewards of solving problems to the contributors, the answer is Justice. The increase of the level of availability of mutual solutions perpetually, forever, and truthfully.  It is still not easy to quantify, but at least we shunned some confusion out of the way, communism for example, doesn't accurately represent Justice, in its promoting of careless, baseless, equal distribution of resources.  Government in all its wisdom and power and synergy is lacking in the diversification of point of views. The market in all its richness of point of views, is

Communism = An Insult to Human Contribution Capitalism = A Compliment to Human Contribution If I were to get the same amount of money, I would have it on the premise of capitalism rather than communism, even if the communism pot were more, I'd prefer the lesser capitalism for the worth of it.  Communism breeds resentment, Capitalism breeds sense of fairness, appreciation, patience, refusal to degradations, solidarity, allegiance to productivity, diverse ways of acknowledgements, and many more positivity.  Yes resentment is a complex sentiment, but the sentiments from Capitalism are rich... resentment is poor. Poor resentment... F U ---------------------------------------------- Which one is more valuable? 10 years worth of work not consumed, compacted in a form of asset being bet in the economy in order to contribute to it? (risking of losing everything or huge chunk of it)... Or 1, 2, or 5 years of work fully consumed already? But in the end, what's important is the problem be

The idea is to have a range of time of when the debate/the discussion would be ended, and then at the moderator's discretion the end of the debate/discussion would be executed within the range. It is for the sake of letting the parties debate freely without the restriction of particularities, so it would be like they would do it on the "streets".  So instead of saying that the debate must finish in an hour, we have between 1 to 2 hours. Both parties would be given the same amount of time, but it would not be specified, one party started talking and then the other party answers, they would go back and forth freely as long as they don't talk over each other relatively speaking. Each time a party talked, their timer would be run, like chess, and eventually the moderator would end the debate by informing the party whose time is lower to match the speaking time of the other party.  (When the speaking time for both sides have equalized, the debate were completed)  Now... I

Living beings have the ability to choose and reject in order to stay alive, I'd like to use that as the definition of life itself.  Living beings could adopt some inclinations and reject some inclinations, they could change the order of priorities of their way of choosing and rejecting. Any reduction of this ability is the larger definition of sufferings. So not just pain, and, not just in terms of power, a better dimension for that is wisdom.  Reduction of one's ability to choose and reject, changing their order of priorities (of inclinations) is suffering. Putting time in perspective, you could suffer in your spirit for your short term as well as for your long term. So knowledge is power, but wisdom is better. The Inclination to keep people away from wisdom might incorporate the inclination to perform transactions, to produce deceptions, however the inclination to perform transactions (commerce) might have the mind of its own.  As we improve our wisdom in the practice of comm