Melki Hassa's Blog

Since I'm a Christian I believe in the Spirit of Truth.  The Truth is about there's only one past, one True past.  Now the argument against being in the side of Christianity is the accumulation of pain. In the realm of Truth there is accumulation of pain, while in the realm of the "enemy chaos" everything that's not the Truth, you could have multiple past and therefore pain is not real when you looked at it that way or whatever. Therefore the only benefit of the Truth is that to reveal this Anti-Truth dimension which probably could be achieved by accelerating a particle or something beyond the speed of light until emerge this reality where quantum possibilities extended through time negatively. Or whatever I'll point out that this is depression, meaninglessness. Also if you could be disciplined about a realm that's completely out of the norm, going out of your way to there like that, why wouldn't you use that to eliminate sufferings in the Truth itself

Transaction tax is not superior from VAT as far as I could understand now.  Maybe there's benefit to implement both, with very very low transaction tax rate (in order to penalize a way of money laundering) but to replace it, I don't know

When we make programs or assets with AI, if something needed to be modified, the AI still couldn't be held responsible with the consequences compared to human inventors. The problem also is that we couldn't really assess comprehensively the codes of AI, how do they get there, and how reliable the results are. If anything wrong happened, what if the AI was unable to correct "responsibly", while we as mere humans couldn't understand or comprehensively assess the weaknesses of the results, say the solutions were complex.  How auditable are AIs?

The Printing of Money in the economy should go hand in hand with the presence of (the circuit of..) assets in the economy. If there were more assets that means more organs therefore need more blood.  Really by asset I mean the relevance of assets not merely the existence of assets.  However I would point that nobody should maintain the relevance of the asset. Everyone who has control over the presence of money should just pay attention to the reality of the economy and adjust accordingly, people should keep their hands off of micro managing the circuits themselves.  I'm talking about innovation and the second law of thermodynamics, don't go against it. Things always change, we could steer the path towards more justice instead of more chaos but we couldn't make it so that it wouldn't change, and so we shouldn't act as if we could (no matter how powerful the impacts of our PR campaigns). In fact, to me it smells like those who were under appreciated for their PR prowe