Melki Hassa's Blog

Hal-hal yang berbau tutorial juga punya daya tarik sendiri, Iklan dalam bentuk instruksi-instruksi singkat, arts & crafts yang pintar dan mudah, atau bahkan instruksi menggunakan produk itu sendiri untuk membereskan masalah, sepertinya akan menarik dan melekat di ingatan.

We recognize that there are so many categories of companies, tangible vs intangible products, manufacturing vs distributors, small vs large, holding vs subsidiaries, public vs private, profit vs non-profit entities, international vs local, etc not mentioning different companies would fall into different configurations of the categories. But users of the financial statements wanted to use the financial statements to grasp the relativity of the company's state with other companies, and so, accountants are expected to have the expertise to create a financial statement that could embody the solution of this need of the information. Until now multiple accounting standards organization created their accounting standards as guidance for their members to achieve this comparability utility. However the ever-increasing magnitude of complexity and fluidity of the world, in respect to ever-changing needs, technologies, laws, market demographics, etc made me skeptical of the ability of one

In order to give users of financial statements better audit opinions in terms of Holding Companies, we could do something like this. Holding Company XYZ, list of component companies: Holding Interim Company XYZ, auditor BIG1, opinion: unqualified, Holding's Overall Balance sheet contribution 50%, Holding's Overall Revenue contribution 20%, Holding's Overall Cost contribution 20%. Company ZYX, auditor BIG2, opinion: unqualified, Holding's Overall Balance sheet contribution 40%, Holding's Overall Revenue contribution 80%, Holding's Overall Cost contribution 78%. Company NEWB1, auditor BIG3, opinion: qualified, Holding's Overall Balance sheet contribution 5%, Holding's Overall Revenue contribution 0%, Holding's Overall Cost contribution 1%. Company NEWB2, auditor BIG4, opinion: qualified, Holding's Overall Balance sheet contribution 5%, Holding's Overall Revenue contribution 0%, Holding's Overall Cost contribution 1%. Summary:

Some may think that the point of view of inclination that I've proposed defies logic in a way that good intentions or good inclinations could result in bad outcome. For example, someone who inclines to save a puppy's life ended up killing the puppy because of bad CPR. If he/she didn't administer the CPR the puppy might have survived. So the inclination to save the puppy's life is not strengthened by acting upon the inclination to save the puppy's life. So that doesn't make sense. But in that case, we must acknowledge the status quo of the hierarchy of the inclinations. And the games they play. It's like chess, there are traps everywhere. And just because we have been kept hostage for a long long time, doesn't mean ultimately the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Instead, Sooner or later, the road to hell will be completely blocked with good intentions.

Humanity has been fighting against Evil for thousands of years. Ever since "Adam and Eve" ate the fruit of good and evil, we have been fighting. How old are you? Do you really attempt to fight against thousands of years of war with your own wit, your own intelligence? In order to completely and permanently uproot power from evil, you have to pick up where we left off. And to do that we should honor the legacies of our warriors, the scientific journals, the laws, and the wisdom. Intelligence deals with knowledge known, Wisdom deals with the unknown. Stand in the shoulders of giants, be a part of the giant, Win, For the Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever.

With progressing technology in universal positioning and A.I predictions of the future, using laws of science and the reality of the reliability of such laws. It is not far fetching to predict that the technology can be used to trace the past. Crime Scene Investigation will be able to use the technology to trace actual events of accidents or murder like rewinding reality to the past. The program could display like a movie, an accurate occurrence of the accidents so that people can learn about the details in how wounds should be treated or whether the accidents were actually purposeful acts of crime and the unidentified people who participated in the crime. Having this technology means that we could trace people before their time of death in the highest possible resolution, and brought them to life in the program. I could have multiple versions of myself, they are all me, but between each other, they are different individuals. They all could be held responsible for my actions, bu

My response comment: The Patent could be used against innovation as all great tools can be used against its purpose. But the fact of the matter is, the growth of 21' st century has been driven largely by patent based inventions. However, we must not forget what truly motivates the growth of assets, meritocracy. The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are not at our full potential because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions.  The idea of patent secures gratitude and rewards to the sources of the solutions we use in the world. In the future, however, using the internet we could make the execution cheaper, more accurate, and more accessible using the mesh/the cloud topology.  Set up social media, and allow everyone to produce their own stickers that could be bought and sold by other people. If I think that certain-certain inventors have helped me with my life, I would buy

Autonomous beings emerged because of God's love for The Truth But in the reign of the Son, the Inclination to keep on Inclining forever, His love for the Truth would be different. No longer will the truth be relevant because of danger, but because of the variability of the ever-increasing intensity of the Inclination to keep on Inclining forever to different autonomous beings. Let's call it Reward Therefore, in the viably realizable Ideal world that is to come, indeed, Greedisgood

While audiences are watching videos, make available a string near the description, visible while watching, "Do you like the video? would you watch a commercial at the end for the video? would you donate for the video?" Each question is a clickable segment, Clicking for the like question would update the time of your like, this would enable information about the relevancy of the video for the current time, even if the video was an old video. Clicking the commercial segment would activate a commercial at the end of the video, even if the video is just a one minute video. Clicking the donate segment would direct the watcher to the payment page after the video. People should be able to activate all three together.

Negotiation is the most important thing in social life. As long as there is another person in this world, agreement would always be a relevant target to achieve. There is a cost to negotiation, especially in time and concentration span, but I'll get back to that issue later. The idea of right exist because of the existence of another negotiable beings. We can empathize that all of us want everything that we want and need to belong to us. And because of that it's only normal that we are friends that share the same idea of freedom. Unfortunately our friendship still hasn't produced the adequate technology to make us unobtrusive to one another (in our true form). So we create artificial rights, basically limitation to the true right of owning everything that we want and need. For example, property rights, human rights, the right to bring matters into court, etc. The rule of thumb is, people wanted to increase the level of availability of mutual solutions, so th

In the future maybe universities will improve their marking system, This is my attempt to hit the target, 1. Examination tests will give minus marks to bad answers, zero marks for no answers, and positive marks for correct answers. For stating facts from memory, as long as they were correct they would likely be appreciated, but greater marks would be acquired through good quality insights based on the accurate facts. 2. There would be various passing thresholds for each individual problems, but maximum marks would be infinite. Those that managed to pass the passing marks would be measured for the first tier pass. What I meant by the first tier is at about equal to A marks or High Distinction marks now. But there would be those who would surpass even those marks in relation to the problem. For those that managed such achievement, they would be marked for excellence by the grader. And then their answer would be passed on to a lead professor or researcher of the university to recei

Why Jesus is the Logos, and not the Letter? Words are made from letters and relationships (between letters). The Logos is about objects and the relationships between them. As Jesus is humble and lovely, truthful and illuminating. As a Christian I aspire to set Love, Truth, Respect, Wisdom and Intelligence to be prioritized in reality. There are so many things to be prioritized at once, but realistically they are one in the Logos, and they could be prioritized altogether.

People have these two circuits in their brain, a classification of good and bad. And this governs the decision making of human beings. I define Evil as eternally bad. Somewhere along the line of evolution, humans started to be able to define eternity, and the relationship between eternity and the bad is evil. Evil is potentially devastating to a person. If you categorize yourself as evil you'd have 3 options: 1. Stop yourself 2. Stop the world 3. Stop the evil within yourself Of course, the right answer is number 3, but the implementation is not always obvious. The harder it is to figure it out, the more tempting the alternatives would be. And as soon as you choose the alternatives, you are in the state of depression. That's how I define it. This inherent circuit extends to the realm of our subconscious, our conscious isn't always able to cooperate with the subconscious. They could cooperate, but sometimes it requires more resources, including time. In order to

Karena orang suka tertukar antara miliar dan million bahasa Inggris, kita bilang saja miliar itu kilojuta... hehehehe :) kira kira gimana, ok?

Ever since I was a little I never able to reliably articulate respect. I kind of able to feel it as I was interacting with different people and different communities, but I can't really explain what respect is if someone asked me. So long as we are not sure what it is really, we are more likely to treat it with less respect... yeah. However, recently I might have found the reliable articulation of respect:        "Respect is the exercise of due of care in order to not cause more problem". It might seem confusing when someone said: I respect the wind when I fly my kite.  Since he would likely not know what problems the wind might face in life, such "respect" should be more like paying special attention to the behavior of the wind. It's close to the respect I talked about but not quite. So this is another kind of respect,        "To consider an object, it's state, interests, and behavior, to be determinant of the subject's outcome

In my opinion Parents' responsibility is to make sure their child like to keep on living for the rest of their lives (the children's lives). I'm not talking about money or property, those only ways of achieving the purpose. Fundamental administration of the mind could also be the answer. But when comes to material things, extreme poverty is just too much. If you are monkeys in the jungle then your access to life's beauty and the skills to appreciate them were set. But if you are struggling in the city of concretes with no certainty of how you're going to sustain your family's life, well... I don't think it's my place to judge in public but at least I could say I don't think to have children when you are in that situation a decision that's considerate. --------------------------- Some might think I'm talking specifically about my parents, I'm just going to tell them my parents are already successful when it comes to me.

The Golden Sticker, the method of posting "receipts" of your reciprocal transactions in your profile page, could be viewed as a "currency". In a sense that people would consider the stickers valid denominator for deciding whether or not a helpful transaction was to be made with the person. The stickers themselves were not supposed to be traded, they serve as a permanent history of your records. Even if you wanted to trade them, a specific license form the counterparty must be obtained. But this is really not a good idea, the purpose of the sticker is to pinpoint whether or not a service or an intellectual solution has worked and resulted in rewards for the author. If you trade your stickers then it would make it hard to trace whether or not you have given back to your sources of solutions. Of course, the right answer, if you traded your sticker, was that you ended up have not given back to the particular author. So the way to use the Golden Sticker system is t

------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the review Pewdiepie, you are awesome. I think Justice is the same as "Passing" mark for solutions for relational problems between people. There would be no justice if there were no problems. So in order to better see Justice we need to better see the nature of relational problems. There are two basic truths that greatly experienced by every people: 1. Nobody was asked whether or not they wanted to be born, therefore everybody deserves everything in the universe. 2. The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. In order to increase the level of availability of mutual solutions, people need to reward those who solve the problems. Therefore since everybody deserves everything, relatively nobody would want to reduce the level of availability of mutual solutions. Therefore a solution would fall in the spectrum of Justice if it doesn't reduce someone's wo

This is my writing in the comment section, I put a lot of thoughts in this so I want to put it here as well: I have thought about the solution that should work. But it's rather long so please bear with me: I co-managed a small consulting business, and there comes a time when there are more potential customers than we can handle. So I should make a decision on what project should we jumped into. What I looked for in a person or a company is their propensity to appreciate, or their willingness to give thanks. If there were 2 future clients with similar offerings but one use piracy and the other doesn't use piracy, I would go on he who doesn't. Because I expect the people who don't use piracy are disciplined in creating reputation asset (a reputation that you're profitable for your stakeholders). Those who appreciate tend to be reasonable to negotiate with. Now, when you talked about competition and boycott, every single person doesn't want to be boycotted

Majalah online diterbitkan oleh Universitas: - Karena Universitas memiliki akses ke alumni dan hasil penelitian, majalah-majalah terbitan tiap fakultas universitas memiliki daya jual tersendiri. Akses ke artikel eksklusif dapat dibeli di aplikasi dan pengiklan bisa memberikan pesannya di tiap artikel yang gratis. Lampu lalu lintas mini untuk pegawai kantor: - Lampu ini bisa dipasang di belakang kursi atau di atas cubicle. Merah artinya jangan diganggu walaupun penting Kuning artinya boleh menginterupsi untuk urusan yang penting Hijau artinya terbuka untuk berdiskusi. 

After all my observant seasons, periods of my life observing people and trends happening around me. I discovered a problematic attitude that has been repeated over and over again. That attitude is the refusal to negotiate. People have limited attention spans, therefore up to this point, it's impossible to negotiate to every other living person. However, the inability to negotiate should be treated with regret and shame, not pride and a sense of legitimacy. Every time whether it's done by Christians, Muslims, Vegans, Libertarians, or even Environmentalist, sending signals that it's good to not care about what the opposition has to say always brought about serious humanitarian issues which might beat the end goal of the cause or the agenda that they are pushing. There are several angles or point of views on where I grounded the claim: 1. The backlash angle 2. The human error angle 3. The existential angle 4. The Risk of Creating persistent coercive Governmental ad

Property is a social construct, we mutually realize the importance of having properties, so the concept was invoked. Therefore property shouldn’t exist within a human being. Property exists within contracts between people. An incredibly attractive person embodies this principle. He/she treats you not as property or territory but if he/she thought you could provide him/her access to some desirable infrastructures, he/she respectfully proposed for a contract. Sometimes the proposal could be in a form of coercive gestures, kabedon for example, but a good proposal always leave the other party freedom to choose and reject. Without giving him/her further difficulties if he/she were to reject the proposal.

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions Solutions are unlimited but we are not rich enough because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions x1.y1 + x2.y2 + x3.y3 each segment is an administration that managed to solve our problems throughout our lives. The formula is about maximizing the potential of life. For each ability you have, you would give thanks to the sources of solutions in order to maximize the level of availability of mutual solutions in your reality. Administrations could be, mathematical administrations, economic administrations, security, health, management discipline like accounting, logic, moral, philosophy, biology, geology, cartography, etc. x refers to the spirit, and y refers to the human authors. You give thanks to the spirits by propagating them and made them prioritized. This usually achieved by investing in assets related to it, learning, copying, and spreading the ideas. You give than

So my windows started to act strangely when I needed it badly. I couldn't search for the control panel, and many other applications, including those located in obscure places. So I decided to fix the windows search problem. I googled it and found a lot of similar problems and different kinds of solutions, but none of them works. I have even reinstalled windows (without deleting applications). But this thread leads me to the answer: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-win_cortana/no-settings-or-control-panel-items-in-search/36fa2c3a-9589-4b6a-9a94-030060c87386?page=4 the answer by mrmattsir didn't work for me but it made me tried to do this: windows explorer > Drive C: > (right-click) Properties >  uncheck the allow files on this drive to have contents indexed... (apply) > recheck the allow files on this drive to have contents indexed (apply). Note: this process could take a lot of time to complete And thank God it works, now my

I find it more exhausting to anticipate than to work or to negotiate (in the long run). Dealing with problems without progressing is very very demanding.

Banyak orang menyadari bahwa terjadi perubahan besar belanja APBN dan Belanja masyarakat sejak Jokowi memimpin negara ini. APBN yg dulunya mungkin sampai 30% “liar” dalam perekonomian sekarang sudah lebih “jinak” dan tidak beredar dengan cara yg sama lagi. Hal ini mengakibatkan perubahan pola belanja yg drastis dan cukup mengagetkan pelaku ekonomi. Uang uang yang dulunya tidak “resmi” dan tidak berani diakui keberadaannya sekarang bermunculan di database perbankan dan perpajakan. Sumber sumber penghasilan berupa uang tunai jauh berkurang dan yg memilikinya dalam jumlah sangat besar semakin mau berinvestasi di lembaga keuangan resmi. Perubahan ini mengakibatkan para pelaku ekonomi mengubah cara mereka berinvestasi. Dengan disiplin disiplin teori ekonomi yang semakin relevan, ekspektasi mereka akan investasi investasi  yang menguntungkan di Indonesia dianggap relatif tidak akan mengecewakan, sehingga langkah langkah konkrit melibatkan kredit dalam jumlah banyak pun dilakukan. Pe

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but I'm not rich enough because I haven't managed to give back to my sources of solutions enough.

Many times I've noticed that as soon as somebody displayed an advanced level of empathy, people deemed him/her responsible for highly delicate feelings every time. I mean with great power comes great responsibility and great amounts of cash. But *error* the great amounts of cash is not found. If you noticed me as having a random personality, it really is the way I want people to take me for. You don't have to upkeep my feelings, but I wish to be treated the same. There should be a large room of freedom for people to do whatever they want before being labeled as bullies by society. Just because I chose not to care doesn't mean I purposefully harm others for my enjoyment. Empathy is not always cheap.

Male Lions are well known for being lazy, really I feel sorry for them, they are not underappreciated money wise, but reputation wise. And the only reason why they are not underappreciated money wise is that they are in absolute sense matter. However, there might come a time when people are going to completely drove them off, not knowing full well of the services they've provided and maintained nor about their true role in an entity. Being a Male Lion means you have to keep check of your territories, in the society of humans, you'd need to keep check of many different indicators, obvious and subtle, and simulate the implications of the existence the indicators picked up to figure out their level of threats.  That previous paragraph is only a small portion of the work and as you can tell this kind of work doesn't appear active at all in the outside. Moreover, different entities including families have different methods of doing this, each with own perks. But all

The Idea of the Golden Sticker is to post receipt in your profile page. The sticker itself is kind of a replacement for the receipt, each author could issue their own tiers of the stickers and give it to whoever have given thanks to him/her. For example: If I gave 100 dollars to Michelangelo, Michelangelo might issue me a silver sticker I could put on my profile page (like badges in multiplayer games). But in another time if I gave 100 dollars to Johann Sebastian Bach, He might give me a Rubber sticker and that's fine because the sticker shouldn't have universal standards. I talked about the idea to my cousin and he felt that something's not right with showing off / flexing stickers on your profile page. So the solution is: the author will put your sticker on their profile page as well. It is reciprocal, it is not a goods and services transaction, it's a relationship declaration. That guy has helped me and I have helped him. And this is in the best interest of

Dear Wikipedia, * I'd buy if you make your own e-currency (like bitcoin) * If you allow people to make accounts in your site and have their donator's rating available on their profile page. I'd gladly donate to you for the dual purpose of keeping Wikipedia free and jacking up my rep.

Lovely is eternally good Evil is eternally bad

When comes to sex be as expensive as possible When comes to love be as cheap as possible When comes to solving problems be as precise and accurate as possible

I can't believe I'm doing this, but I'm stuck and all I'm hearing right now is somebody who knows little about the other person, giving serious advice for her life. Spewing swearing words is the cheapest but easiest way to attract attention. Because of course, people tend to think when they hear swearing words that something dangerous is happening. And our social brain cares about dangerous stuff happening around us. When it turned out to be not dangerous it became funny, because the quick shift from danger to safe tickles us. So it's hard to go wrong using swearing words to attract attention. The blunder / the risk may exist merely when it's usage actually offended somebody or actually caused a problem against a person or a group of people. So it's kind of a low risk high return tool. And when you're giving advice about somebody's life, you don't really have to have the right solution, just spew swear words about her problem, she will

I want to tell apart the deserving and the "out of forgiveness" elements of the facilities I have access to. Like in Financial Statements, Assets came from Equity and Liability, I want to tell the facilities I have access to, how much of them are out of deserving and how much of them are out of forgiveness. Now I know that these things, deserve, grace, are two things that are not objective. There are no clear science on the absolutes of these matters. However the society has it's own standards, I don't have to push to acquire the absolute, just like the value of money is relative, deserving and grace could be looked at from the society's standard's point of view. If I have a tool to constantly monitor and give real time statements on the composition of deserve and grace that's on me. I feel that I could make use of it. 

This is how you can use that fruit of good and bad  good and evil to the max of it's potential, Create standards of what's evil and what's not while looking at yourself, past, present, and the future. Standards you set when looking at other people are viruses, on the other hand ones that you set while looking at yourselves are vaccines. There's a reason why the whole bible is devoted to tell the story that God himself came to the world to become a forgiveness activist, and He put His own flesh and blood on it. The standard you set while looking at other people, used upon yourself could potentially wreck you, on the other hand it's hard to make yourself laugh tickling yourself, it's hard to make yourself depressed out of standards you made to take care of yourself. 12 Rules for life by Dr. Jordan Peterson is great, I value every money I spent on it. Update: So the fruit was not good and bad it was good and evil, it's important and the bible was pr

Depression, the embodiment of the inclination to not incline, the enemy... Could really be broken down to that question. All of our fears for us that's not in depression is also about the question. Do I deserve good things? Who deserves good things? Who doesn't? And what an achievement it is to be able to unravel the reason or the philosophy that could say "all of you deserve good things", while at the same time synchronize with reality resulted in permanent, abundant mutual solutions in reality. But do I really deserve good things? Who doesn't deserve good things? 2017 lecture of Dr. Jordan B Peterson about Personality, Biology/Traits: Incentive Reward/Neuroticism (https://youtu.be/ewU7Vb9ToXg) Presents the state of depression as when you categorize yourself in the "bad" box. People has a sense of good and bad, they judge. If you judge yourself as bad, really, then what's your reason to keep on going? You'd basically rationalize f

This is going to be a long post, before, here is a keyword from Dr. Jordan B Peterson, sorry I forgot, Basically in his lecture in 2017 about Openness and Intelligence, he talked about how if a person sees the future as predictable it would became easier for him/her to invest in his/her future. And the opposite is true. So if a person wants to be hardworking he/she would achieve that state easier if he/she believed that the future is certain for him/her. Now, Have you ever experienced a serene and powerful lonely time in your parents' house when they are away? But when they got back home the house become so stressful you lost your previous drive to plan and execute? Well that means your parents has managed to provide you with stability, good enough for you to see forward. However your parents can't feel that about their home, and you must understand, when you saw a serene and powerful house they saw bills, clients, customers, employees, or bosses that has their own probl

One potential addressable problem when dealing with old learners is they tend to stress themselves upon "inferior" results, easily frustrated. While young learners don't care about other people's grand achievements, they tend to appreciate their smaller progresses more. This makes it more likely (although not the only factor) for young learners to burn things into their minds compared to old learners. Isn't it the other way around? Yes, there is a higher resolution about this from my point of view, Young people tend to consider their achievements yet to be significant enough for the world, but they encouraged themselves upon small progresses they've made. While I, when consumed by an old mentality considered my achievements were huge for the world but at the same day internally discredited for myself the significance of the improvements I've made. Dissatisfaction of the present However is old and young really a matter of age? When comes to lea

Furniture Subscription Model, Have your store with always new, always clean, always fresh furnitures. When you subscribed to FSM, you technically bought many furnitures with down payments of the price of one. Firstly you decide which furniture you'd like to have and buy it. Next get into contract that after 5 months you would swap the furniture with the new one (there was a one month gap for decision making or one month browsing period). Your old furniture would be cleaned and dried, made as if it were brand new and have it displayed in the FSM store. Your new furniture is actually a used furniture by other people but it feels clean, smells good, and it looks good. It makes your room feel brand new. All of the decisions would be made online, you don't have to leave your home. You could if you wanted to but the store has it's high standard that made it unnecessary for you to do so. The cost of doing this is expended every time a swap was made, and it's like a main

Problem solving is a part of charm, Every time you've successfully solved a problem, you'll adopt a charm point. And this point doesn't have to be manually communicated, people have innate ability to sense things like this (although different people are sensitive to different things). If what you do every single day is solving the same problem over and over again, Your spouse is a human being as well that has the intuition for diversification. What you want to do is to consider different problem solving in your spare time, And if you're good at something new make it a new habit. Your spouse will find you perplexing with some new kinds of charms. 

If somehow people understand about my philosophy, and tried it in their life... They might be tempted to pursue absolute profit, a state when they could safely say they owe nothing anymore to their sources of solutions. DON'T Instead you have to pursue to use as many services as possible (sounds counter intuitive?) Because by interacting with a working mutual solutions means that you prioritize the spirit behind it, and that's a contribution. So you will have this balance of life exploration and giving thanks. Giving thanks it's very important, but our focus is limited, and by inventing or discovering hopefully we will ended up with a system that could automatically take care of our human sources of solutions. Again it's all about hope guys, because we can't yet achieve pure ethical state. Every time we took a bath we destroyed billions and billions of lives on our skin. Even when we could figure out the whole ethical issue one day, there's still other issues

So I've explained many times about what I believe to be the solution to many piracy issues. Which is the golden sticker. Where basically you post receipts of your transactions with the authors of the solutions you use, in your social media profile page. By doing this you will be acknowledged by potential business partners or investors as person who give thanks to the sources of his/her solutions. Now, there is a way to mess up with the ecosystem of the golden sticker, if one kept on giving stickers for free, low quality high quality, high quantity. Then the value of the stickers would be unreliable. A way to deal with this is for every sticker pair (because a sticker in one profile linked to at least another sticker in another profile) the social media company and the government would be given a cut. Yes, transaction tax. By embracing transaction tax, we could improve data reliability. 

It might be viable to give victims of criminal acts permission and controlled means to communicate online with the criminal in jail in order to ask the criminal for information or knowledge, or to ask them for services or products made using tools allowed in jail. Criminals are not oblidged to comply but they do not have any right to any form of payments as well. However local jugde could prevent or ban further communication if it's dangerous for the parties and for the society.