Equilibrium Tax v.06 (Bad)

Despite the amount of money issued by banks/central banks, there's this thing when the circuits of commerce reached an equilibrium of price. The difference between the amount of active money in the equilibrium circuits and the total money issued are the magnitude of risks of the equilibrium disruption in total. The manifestation of the risk could be dispersed throughout different circuits such as the circuit of food disturbances, the circuit of oil / gas, the circuit of currencies, etc, or it may be focused on one. 

In order to reduce the impact of the disturbance the government may implement equilibrium tax, when all extraordinary flows of money were taxed like vat. The proceeds would be used to lessen the problems caused by the disturbance. Obviously we also would want to identify whether the disturbanced were maliciously orchestrated or were they just common scarcities or curiousity phenomenons / marketing phenomenons. 

The problem is the magnitude or the percentage of taxes were determined by the authority (as with any other taxes and freights) therefore we need some kind of measures to anchor how should the tax be set. As illustration cars, houses, and mobile phones are not frequent flows of goods therefore most likely it wouldn't be relevant. Rents and salaries though are frequent but we want the people to be able to move around more in this case, especially towards the rural or new areas. 

Not all equilibrium taxes are the same and the subjects could also vary from individuals or groups. However if one were to anticipate group labelling to prevent coordinated attacks, one must also consider the time factor, the space factor, the context factor where and when some individuals could be relevant for the label, because things could oscillates or orbiting around in label, and such too would be correct. 

Housing prices could be weird though, because they were meant to locals and even though foreign participation could be good for the economy, similar impact could be emulated if they "disturbed" the property supplies. But is the equilibrium tax or similar would be the right solution? or the only solution? weird cause housing really is not a frequency thing.

Now this concern I think is the most important for me, education causes disturbances in the equilibrium. When people became smarter, the equilibrium changes... now this, THIS is the inherent job of the current style government already, must be, so no extra work this is the job of any governments. So and so all the more reason to implement ways so that they could focus firstly on this. 

At the end of the day when one has became a part of a circuit, he/she/it wouldn't be disturbing anymore. They? could be, of course

-----------------

Edit: Everything is the government's job, yeah 

------------------

Edit2: Shit now I realized, we are fighting against entropy here. We can not do this

A Case for Peace, and why Nuclear war is away v.05d

Simply put we are at peace because of goodness in the world. I mean the goodness in this world outweighed the bad, and that's also another reason to support our governments. But which side of the government? Definitely not the corrupt side because that's not good. Good things are harmonious, they support each other, and that's why peace is definitely good.

So the misconception that I wanted to argue here is that the chaotic side of the people, the things that are not clear, are not good because they reduce the power of property. When we transact outside the realm of officialness there should be a strict discipline not to traverse beyond the lines of official properties. You can't insinuate that "oh that thing is officially yours but that's not actually yours you know", property is property and because property is property the danger that's over there threatens the property that is over here. "If what I have is not truly mine then what difference would it make if everything collapsed?"

So Law and Contracts and above that Justice is the pure good side that's carrying us all. Could Justice be unofficial? definitely, and if so we should be able to make a case for it out in the open. Does the obscure side of countries and companies, such as the intelligence and corporate espionage are always bad? No but how could we draw the line if we couldn't tell apart good from bad? 

But this post is about nuclear safety not all about unofficial careers, even though beyond my knowledge such might be mostly relevant in some obscure way.

----------------------------------

People said this generation might be a weak generation that's going to create "difficult times", yet people also don't want implement clearness and black on whiteness making those who are not reciprocal or those who aren't grateful obvious. So, what would be the solutions? War on the innocents? No! Let's just stand our ground and fight when the enemy was being the enemy. 

Every era has its solutions, why are we living in delusions? Say reality is now but its nothing but an illusion. The Truth is not all fiction, the part that wants to be Itself is not the part that doesn't. So break apart and tear apart, cause what the other one is is just not wanting to be alone in its desire for self destruction.