Experts are good at what they do, if you zoom out to the long term, seasoned experts would be those who appreciate things related to their expertise best.
The increase in entropy would mess with one's relevance, it'd mess with one's agility, but proper appreciation is a divine prize
National Health insurance is a blessing but its also a big burden for the whole society. So in order to ease the burden consider this:
Upon coverage of past treatment, a then successful person could decide to return the cost to the insurance company. The insurance company then returned to him/her all the premiums before that.
This coverage then would be recorded in the books as cost / tax deductible.
-----------
The cost of human resources should include their health right? So it is only logical to include their health costs against their revenue. However we don't pile up everything at once because its too expensive of a cost that way, but in truth it is always there lingering.
It is not a bad thing, not putting in the equation all of the health costs of a worker or a revenue receiver, only those immidiately associated with the context of the revenue. On the other side of the coin, wouldn't it be an objective assessment to acknowledge the rest of the costs as contributive too when a point has already been reached?
If you can own then you can share
If you can not own then you can't share
If you're regulated to "share" that's not sharing cause that's not yours
If you want to improve sharing, you got to reduce tax and increase LOVE
------------
I'm not saying that the share of tax is not owned by government workers ok, but those are not "yours" to begin with, therefore those were not "shared", those were allocated. If you wanted to improve "sharing" then to increase tax is an idiot solution.
Reputation has a spectrum, it could come from achievements, popular presentation of one's self, being audited or scrutinized, being on a court, etc.
What I envision the future would be if people would want to improve on how they measure reputation is:
The favor of consumers over a company would not only be from the prices of their products, or the qualities, or how fancy and dandy were their situations, but it should be more fluid. A company would be measured not only from its size and prevalence but people would look at the "golden stickers" or the history of achievements of their management for example. When the management changes how the public would view the company would also changes, scientists would be able to influence this as well for example by pointing out the statistic of how the change of management influence company policies and achievements, how sensitive a company is to change of management. Something like that
Another point that should also be in the spectrum is scrutiny. Like now we often were scrutinized by the tax office, that's how we and the government came in good terms. Those who had undergone high scrutiny would probably be trusted more by the government. Strangely now people who were cancelled received no extra points for being scrutinized, the consumers quickly move on to the next new thing while ignoring the advantages that their network already build with people like Pewdiepie, Joe Rogan, Johnny Depp etc (some names are controversial but rightly mentioned; Mr. Beast, Logan Paul, Dr. Disrespect, Will Smith, and more). Not saying that they are better than the other people, but the fact that they've been under scrutiny should be an extra merit, which is unfortunately the public in general is not doing that in my opinion.
So of course an obvious possible way of how this improvement would happen would likely be from an app or an extention to social media. Golden Sticker for example is something that I've proposed for more than a decade, is a system of putting stickers in your profile page that's an aggregation of your receipts, such electronic sticker could be filtered and zoomed in through various dimensions such as period, type of industries, magnitudes, etc. Now in this case, one might incorporate a display of how many times he/she/it had been audited, by what parties. Each communities would do well also to have a forum where they could chip in information that would make up these "badge" or these electronic favors.
These favors are important for each individuals because we want to be in a circuit and we don't want to have our community or our circuit to not be reciprocal to us. Also other reasons such as altruism, honesty, devotion, Justice, and fairness. What I'm saying here is hardly new, we already knew of the term "blood diamond", "black companies", "child labor sweatshops", and these people have actually in my opinion started something big. This is an easy way to look at it but of course it is more than that, to have an online electronic reputation system would help people to recognize the entities better, and the entities should not be encouraged to be a giant, but to be fluid where they wouldn't mind to disband and regroup, they would not lose their achievements. Entities would also not encouraged to manipulate speech or public images or to adopt hostile PR policies that attacked honesty, because people value courage more than touches of "make up".
The municipalities could announce seasonal or occassional requests for goods and services in exchange for cash (of course, tax coupons, or tax discounts)
When social condemnation is your god, you'd need the social to condemn
However you knew that the society is blind, so you'd need the society to conform to esteemed figures
However you knew that the revered figures are corruptible (especially those who gave assurance that they're uncorruptible), so you need auditors
However you knew that the revered figures will attack the auditors, but somehow you didn't know what to do...
Lets increase the punishments instead
--------------------------
fyi : that post was sarcastic... -_-
why make punishment harder and harder for public sentiment? Evil politicians! Like, these persecutions only empowers them to intimidate others who are checking on them or wanted to do better than them. Reduce the punishments so that audit can be done with less stakes and anyone can audit. If you said audit is a market then the opposite is logical! we need people to realize what audit is and how expensive it is... if they never do that because of "culture" which is trash and satanic (that aspect of it), how could they understand and appreciate what it is and what it costs?
Cheap audit is cheap and its beautiful
Expensive audit is expensive and its beautiful
Based on my own personal observation, open to critique btw, some people have different meanings of worship when they say worship. I think what a lot of people had is I'll subject myself to "God" with absolute loyalty. That's the kind of embedded circuit within people, which entails one of the "need" in human being, to have someone or some deities to worship. Its probably like sex where it just needs to be channeled.
However you got to train yourself to separate elements of this circuit in your brain. Politicians could tap into this and take advantage of this against our own best interests. People might not realize this but the party that they're in, the race, the religion, the group that they're in, potentially not only cater to our social needs but also our room for God. Such if unchecked can make people do things or be a certain way that is profitable firstly not to them but to other people (evil politicians).
So when you worship, worship to the true God that is the Spirit of Truth, cause you'd pledge your loyalty to the Truth and then you'd be free. Because worship will make you be wrong when the "god" is wrong, but if God is the Spirit of Truth then He will invite audit.
Search me O Lord and Seek out my Heart...
