The Moral place for Evil v.02

In my previous post, I realized that existence can't deny the past. The fact that evil exists means that if we were to continue, evil will always be a part of us.
But my compassionate side knew that if that's the case then when looking at evil as an inclination (a character) if it is self-preserving, it will only be and going to be tortured by existence. The more we are better at being just, the more we will reject, disintegrate, and kill evil while redefining them over and over again.

In a highly desirable society, Paradise, Evil will be in hell.

But this will still be compassionate if Evil inclinations such as the Inclination to stop everything, and the Inclination to make others incline to not incline (the depressions), were to have no self-preservation properties and tendencies. Inanimate objects.

So the moral place for Evil is for it to have no independence in everything, no self-initiatives, no self-preservation, while still able to incline. An example of this would be like a flame that inclines to dissipate after radiating light particles and heat. It has no inclination to maintain itself a flame.

When technology advanced towards the ability to trace the past, reanimated the past and brought creatures of the past alive. People would always going to stumble upon evil existing in the past. The logical way to go about it is to just know that it is there and step on it to figure out what happened, but do not resurrect it. 

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Matthew 6:34, worries and the system of money

Piracy and Expectation

The Golden Sticker v.07