Cruel part of Reality v.02

There's always a part of reality or the Truth that is kind (yashashi) and a part that's hostile towards us. Let's acknowledge the hostile parts properly so that we could tell it apart and then be able to lock on the kind part properly. Thennnnnn, in the end actually hold on to the Truthfully kind property God has provided for us in front of us. 

Shun away the cloud of lies that's preventing us from taking in the wholesome nutrition instead of half poisons. 

Accurate Audit is Omega Valuable

Reaksi Keberingasan (Berserking Drug)

Surpress the Ego, unreasonably. 

Since the Ego was surpressed unnecessarily, it would attract envy towards normality / decentness. 

Have an army that's like that, all you got to do is to give a little reason to unleash it, it is there. 

------------------

Mwuahahaha lihat pasukanku, hitung robot robotku, tiap saat kalau saya mau tinggal jentik, tinggal sentil... mwuahahahaha

Jangan macam-macam sama saya, (kamu tidak tahu betapa banyaknya dosaku), tinggal sentil tinggal jentik, pasukanku akan "melayaniku" bahkan mati untukku, walaupun dalam benaknya untuk "Tuhan". Mwuahahaha, sayalah Tuhan itu...

------------------ (ceritanya ini orang jahat)

Catalyst:

Unreasonable sense of entitlement, like for example other people's assets are belong to people like us (but us are not to question the decisions our supreme leader made for ourselves including claiming our properties as not fully ours). 

The Lie The Establishments Force us to tell

Job Security

Is there a thing as "Customer Security?" if there was then Job Security is there but really? Really? Couldn't the customer switch suppliers/sellers anytime they want? But regulations force us to submit to "Job Security" policies. They force us to lie and this needs to be changed.

When you believe in lies, all the lies are going to go against the thing that you want the most 

(me, currently)

More reasons why innuendo is itchyly disgusting v.05

I'm trying to be a proponent of negotiation, I respect humanity as beings of negotiation. Therefore I understand how people could feel uneasy if unheard. I don't condone extreme behavior but I would expect it. But if the culture of innuendo is rampant, as much as I want to say "I'm not responsible over the things you don't say to me to my face" I'm still uncomfortable ignoring all of the insecurities. 

Yes you couldn't possibly accommodate all negotiations, that's why we have the law, that's why we have the council, legislative, the social medias etc. But if people thought that they are entitled to your care for their innuendos that's condoning reduction of your property, disrespect towards you. It's disgusting.

The concentration you spend on innuendos is the concentration you don't spend on other things, your work, your family, your issues, the people who respectfully communicate their concerns with you, among else

------------------------------

Straightforward negotiation doesn't entail full responsiblity as well for me. I'm not saying I'm going to conform to all negotiations. Isn't that for everybody too?

------------------------------

When you negotiate not face to face, how could you negotiate in the accurate context. We know that every law has context upon how, when, and where, etc the instructions were practiced. Innuendo especially is trying to disrespect this reality, which is stupid, but forced. So stupid

------------------------------

When people are in a trauma, they tend to want to use that innuendo to avoid confronting some parts of reality. If people are not using it loosely we would easily concentrate on one when one use it. This thirst of attention abusers dilutes the society's preparedness/resources to promptly pay attention to the ones who need it the most.

Celebrity + Psychologist Combo v.03

I'm not giving a professional advice, and I'm so prone of mistakes. I'm just exploring reality through "playing" circuit of the brain, right now in this blog. I'm tuning for the right "frequency" like a radio, making mistakes as I go. So, please take this with a grain of salt and consult with your professional advisor for professional/significant stakes assurances.

I think being a Celebrity or popular Influencer is risky in a way that people would be tempted to interact with you with their surpressed needs and desires. However, this also makes being a psychologist and a celebrity a powerful combo. 

People are not realizing that they need psychologist so they went on bullying people or make things difficult for other people just to feel a certain way. They expected being treated by other people with extra exertion of mindfulness while actually it is them who needs treatment. 

This is also a factor that contributes to the popularity of communism/socialism, people think other people having their properties are too mean/cruel, because that means they would be frowned upon if they expected out other people, something that's actually supposed to be at the other people's own freedom to give.

This is also the reason why psychologists being one of the most essential need for human beings are so expensive and not scaled up economically, because people got their "fix" (which is far from good quality fix) out of bullying people, getting extra attentions, or anything extra that's invasive. 

So if we popularize the habit of paying for psychological solutions, we should be able to reach economies of scale for psychological products that a lot of us actually are so good at making.  

----------------------------

For kids or other amateur maybe, other than a lemonade stand you could also set up a chit chat stand. Keep in mind there are professional standards such as confidentiality and scientific knowledge that you couldn't provide so make sure to cover your responsibilities accordingly beforehand.