Melki Hassa's Blog

If it's true that a living individual must have exclusive access over an asset (body). Then you can do this to a multiple personalities: The one who switch between personalities is a personality, and that guy is the guy. Give that guy a name, it's not the name he would call himself but that's how you call him. Talk to him while he's using a personality. If the personality said "I don't know who you're talking to, or what you're talking about" you said I'm talking to the one who switches between you and the others.

I have just watched Pew Die Pie's video https://youtu.be/uEePyLeOsbM Playing A.I that teach itself or themselves. And got me thinking, what if A.I teach themselves how to keep on inclining. I always want to learn to become a part the inclination to keep on inclining forever. Both my mind and my body. What if an A.I could successfully achieve that? Can an A.I became depressed? Can it experience pain, torture? Can it feel pleasure and happiness? I think those features exist in all individuals that can pick and reject, changes the way it picks and rejects, and protect it's ability to pick and reject. With the existence of A.I, we could make inanimate objects alive, and evil things dead (evil things not going to be able to feel anything including pain because it has absolutely no asset, and/or no inclination to protect itself both conscious and subconsciously). 

I saw Jordan B Peterson's tweet about how the Japanese police had little to do because crime was low there. I have an idea, including for the army: Take care of orphanage children or, adopt some children. Yes the institution will become the parent. It's much much better than having 1 person parenting 10 children at once, with little money. In my opinion, 1 parent for every 2 children would be nice.

I'm going to face off with this proposal: If the inclination thing is true then being compassionate means to stop everything because serving the inclination to keep on inclining forever means maintaining hell for inclinations that are "bad", there never going to be a compassionate solution for everything. Answer: 1. You don't know how inclinations access the memory, you don't know "torture" in a sense of the body of inclinations. Those bad inclinations could be made without body, without memory, they might not going to feel anything. 2. Are you just going to ignore the inclination of progress that's being prioritized now? 20-30 years ago people rarely ever care for poor people in another continent, now we are increasing their prosperity in rapid proportions. We are not some kind of sadistic lovely people who only care about our and our family's own concerns. Serving mutuality improves the reach of your solutions and one day we are going to figur

Living beings can pick, reject, and change the way they pick and reject. Meaning they have asset and memory. If inclination to incline is everything, then the past must be his memory and therefore He is Alive. If you one doesn't have memory then one can't enjoy nor suffer. Memory is a formation that's formed after interactions. In terms of us and our limitations, memory is a formation that's formed after interactions that can synchronize with our tools of deciphering, resulted in information about causality of the formation.

In a road of max 40 km/h there are 2 cars both at 40 km/h, The first car was 60 km/h 2 second ago, and the second car was 10 km/h 2 sec ago.

Sometimes when I go to a place I do many things there, some of the little things I forgot to complete. I'd like a reminder that could remind me only the things I want to do at the specific location when I arrived at that location. So the notification were to be activated per location.

Situs imajinasi janjijanji dot com, sebuah tempat dimana orang bisa menawarkan janji dan menerima uang. Tentu saja kalau penawar banyak membuat deal-deal yang menguntungkan reputasinya semakin bagus. Contoh, 1. Saya berjanji bagi yang memberi saya 1 juta rupiah, bulan depan 50% keuntungan bisnis saya saya berikan kepada mereka. (Memperlihatkan laporan keuangan bisnis, rata-rata keuntungannya 3 juta per bulan, jadi kemungkinan relatif bulan depan pledgers bisa dapat untung 150%). 2. Saya berjanji bagi yang mensponsori saya bertanding, 30% uang hadiah saya berikan kepada mereka. (Biaya sponsor 10 juta rupiah, hadiah 50 juta rupiah, kemungkinan menang atlit itu 90%, jadi ada 10% kemungkinan 10 juta kita akan jadi nol, tapi 90% akan jadi 15 juta rupiah). Kalau rame-rame menyumbang misalnya 50 orang masing masing 200 ribu, maka resikonya 10% kehilangan 200 ribu saja.

I see that a lot of discontent expressed by feminists basically are their dissatisfaction towards the reality that seem to favor people with low neurotic ism. Firstly I propose my line of thinking that most males became less neurotic due to evolution, when our male ancestors went to war, people with high neurotic ism tend to die out. Leaving the civilization with male genetics with lack neurotic ism. I can't seem to fathom why feminist hate order, when neurotic ism suppose to thrive in the time of order, and lack of neurotic ism thrive in the time of chaos. Women seem to be able to identify problems more than males, although during unpredictable circumstances tend to have longer thought process before creating a solution to the problem. Sometimes the problem they identify overwhelms them and render them not wanting to create a solution (because lack of focus) while males tend to ignore certain things and ended up creating a solutions that work even though a bit tasteless for women

Have you noticed when a medicine practice opened up in your area the property price increased? Now what if not many people are sick, wouldn't the doctor had to increased the price? What if the neighborhood decided to routinely take care of the doctor, since the doctor has helped them, really? This applies for opening up store in remote places. During the time of the opening, the products sold might be relevant, but after sometime it would cease being relevant, but, it will be relevant again when the season come. During this off season, what would the store owner eat? And what if later in one year a bigger company came and took most of his market before he break even? People, we need incentives for these kinds of businesses to venture in our community. It would be beneficial to make life easier for them.

We should all save money for every fruit we made in order to be able to create this when necessary. - Disease that can be totally eradicated - Rare natural conditions - Conflict that can be solved but expensive Things that are not profitable for businesses to handle but better be done. Things that statistically underappreciated by many people Things that are fun and inspirational but also above above

What if the central bank regulates that banks must measure the price comparison of per meter square of property with 1 sack of rice. If it exceeded 300 times then the maximum leverage must be 60% 400 times then the maximum leverage must be 50% 600 times then the maximum leverage must be 40% and so on. So people can still freely buy property but using mostly their own money if the price is relatively unreasonable. Something like that.

Jangan bunuh diri Sedikit lagi Hidup yang baru Makhluk yang baru Sedikit lagi Bertahanlah Temukan arti dibalik penderitaan

Setelah membuat APBN, pemerintah memasukkan proyek-proyek tersebut di situs crowdsourcingnya. Rakyat kemudian membayar secara sukarela untuk membiayai proyek-proyek tersebut. Sebagai gantinya, rakyat akan diganti kupon yang hanya bisa digunakan untuk membayar pajak. Contoh anda menyumbang 5000 untuk membangun jalan, anda akan mendapat kupon 5000 yang hanya bisa dipakai untuk membayar pajak. Kupon ini tentu saja bisa diperjual-belikan kalau kalau pajak kewajiban anda terlalu sedikit, karena mungkin kupon ini hanya berlaku untuk 1 tahun. Daya tarik dari membeli kupon ini adalah, proyek yang anda biayai mencantumkan nama anda sebagai donaturnya. Artinya nama anda akan terpatri di halaman proyek itu atau di tempat permanen yang bisa dikenali, jadi anda akan mendapat rekam jejak sebagai salah satu kontributor proyek tersebut. Karena proyek tersebut sudah dibiayai oleh rakyat, maka pemerintah mendapat surplus. Surplus ini tidak boleh dipakai untuk yang lain, karena untuk periode selanjutn