My literal articulation of Respect

Ever since I was a little I never able to reliably articulate respect. I kind of able to feel it as I was interacting with different people and different communities, but I can't really explain what respect is if someone asked me. So long as we are not sure what it is really, we are more likely to treat it with less respect... yeah.

However, recently I might have found the reliable articulation of respect:

       "Respect is the exercise of due of care in order to not cause more problem".

It might seem confusing when someone said: I respect the wind when I fly my kite. 

Since he would likely not know what problems the wind might face in life, such "respect" should be more like paying special attention to the behavior of the wind. It's close to the respect I talked about but not quite. So this is another kind of respect,

       "To consider an object, it's state, interests, and behavior, to be determinant of the subject's outcome of ventures, therefore, paying special care to it out of the consideration".

Parents' responsibility in my opinion v.03

In my opinion Parents' responsibility is to make sure their child like to keep on living for the rest of their lives (the children's lives).
I'm not talking about money or property, those only ways of achieving the purpose. Fundamental administration of the mind could also be the answer.
But when comes to material things, extreme poverty is just too much. If you are monkeys in the jungle then your access to life's beauty and the skills to appreciate them were set. But if you are struggling in the city of concretes with no certainty of how you're going to sustain your family's life, well... I don't think it's my place to judge in public but at least I could say I don't think to have children when you are in that situation a decision that's considerate.

---------------------------

Some might think I'm talking specifically about my parents, I'm just going to tell them my parents are already successful when it comes to me.

The Golden Sticker as a currency v.02

The Golden Sticker, the method of posting "receipts" of your reciprocal transactions in your profile page, could be viewed as a "currency". In a sense that people would consider the stickers valid denominator for deciding whether or not a helpful transaction was to be made with the person.

The stickers themselves were not supposed to be traded, they serve as a permanent history of your records. Even if you wanted to trade them, a specific license form the counterparty must be obtained.
But this is really not a good idea, the purpose of the sticker is to pinpoint whether or not a service or an intellectual solution has worked and resulted in rewards for the author. If you trade your stickers then it would make it hard to trace whether or not you have given back to your sources of solutions. Of course, the right answer, if you traded your sticker, was that you ended up have not given back to the particular author.

So the way to use the Golden Sticker system is to pile them as much as possible in your profile page for the rest of your life. That would show that you appreciate solutions you are using in life. And that should mean that you are good business for your stakeholders.

------------------

On the side note let's talk about reputation asset. This is related to the golden sticker and might give you the reason why the idea is good for you.

Every time you give thanks to your sources of solutions, you would gain many benefits. One being the creation of "reputation that you are a profitable person to help". This reputation asset emerged in 3 places as soon as you completed giving thanks:
1. In the truth, or in history
2. In your mind
3. In the mind of your source of solutions.
This asset will eventually become trees of many beneficial fruits. Some of those are:
1. Esteem (this came from the mind of your source)
2. Confidence (this came from your mind)
3. Assurance of Esteem and Confidence (this came from the rest of reality)
Note that the value of esteem is unstable, like waves in the ocean, sometimes it's at high tide sometimes it's at low tide, but giving thanks gave access to the beach.

But those three are not the main benefits, they are just one of many depending on your circumstances. Other benefits could be Knowledge, Intuition on what's truly hard and what's truly less hard, and Negotiation skills. And they could come from different fruits of reciprocity as well, I mean the act of giving thanks will give rise to interlinked benefits. More reliable senses of security and meaningful properties being the derivations, more objective empathy, social endorsements, higher problem-solving tendencies, and many more good results.

I believe that the more you give thanks the stronger your assets would be, and fewer things would be able to ruin your compositions. One of them could be bringing up the reciprocal deeds you've done in order to acquire something from your sources of solutions. That would change profit to debt, and instead of having the reputation as a profitable person, you would change that to the reputation as a loan shark.

Response to Pewdipie's book review; Plato's the Republic

-------------------------------------------------
Thank you for the review Pewdiepie, you are awesome.
I think Justice is the same as "Passing" mark for solutions for relational problems between people. There would be no justice if there were no problems. So in order to better see Justice we need to better see the nature of relational problems. There are two basic truths that greatly experienced by every people:

1. Nobody was asked whether or not they wanted to be born, therefore everybody deserves everything in the universe. 2. The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. In order to increase the level of availability of mutual solutions, people need to reward those who solve the problems. Therefore since everybody deserves everything, relatively nobody would want to reduce the level of availability of mutual solutions. Therefore a solution would fall in the spectrum of Justice if it doesn't reduce someone's worthiness of everything and doesn't reduce the level of availability of mutual solutions for the long run. The intensity of its justness would be magnified if the solution further increases the level of availability of mutual solutions and increases one's access to them without reducing the other's current access. However, people compromise with a lesser form of justice when there were no other solutions. People would accept solutions that are the closest towards that direction (as just), whenever they couldn't come up with true Justice.