The Past is in the Future v.03

With progressing technology in universal positioning and A.I predictions of the future, using laws of science and the reality of the reliability of such laws. It is not far fetching to predict that the technology can be used to trace the past.

Crime Scene Investigation will be able to use the technology to trace actual events of accidents or murder like rewinding reality to the past. The program could display like a movie, an accurate occurrence of the accidents so that people can learn about the details in how wounds should be treated or whether the accidents were actually purposeful acts of crime and the unidentified people who participated in the crime.

Having this technology means that we could trace people before their time of death in the highest possible resolution, and brought them to life in the program.

I could have multiple versions of myself, they are all me, but between each other, they are different individuals. They all could be held responsible for my actions, but for the acts done after the resurrections, they should answer only with respect to themselves.

So in this life, the relevant question to ask myself is, would I love to keep on living forever? Would I look back to the choices that I've made, 1000, to 1 million years from now and laughed? or would I cry? Would the people in the future hold me responsible for the things that I've done? Would they welcome me in friendship as I mend the things that I've done? How hard should I toil before I could actually make an overall desirable connection with the people of that world?

My works, my inventions, my discoveries, would they help me? Would they help them?

Maybe I'm going to be the richest person in the world, or maybe the happiest. I'm optimistic

Anyway,

The world is fractal if you wish that you could turn back time, then just wait.

Trying to promote the Golden Sticker Idea again

My response comment:

The Patent could be used against innovation as all great tools can be used against its purpose. But the fact of the matter is, the growth of 21' st century has been driven largely by patent based inventions.

However, we must not forget what truly motivates the growth of assets, meritocracy. The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are not at our full potential because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions. 

The idea of patent secures gratitude and rewards to the sources of the solutions we use in the world. In the future, however, using the internet we could make the execution cheaper, more accurate, and more accessible using the mesh/the cloud topology. 

Set up social media, and allow everyone to produce their own stickers that could be bought and sold by other people. If I think that certain-certain inventors have helped me with my life, I would buy their stickers to give thanks. The stickers that I've bought shall appear on my profile page, they would look like (Google 2018 silver sticker, Microsoft 2019 golden sticker, Google 2019 golden sticker). And in their profile page shall appear my sticker (Melki 2018 golden sticker, Melki 2019 platinum sticker, Melki 2019 platinum sticker). It shows that a mutual transaction has occurred, I've paid them money, and they have the royalty in the solution of my life/business.

So what this will create is the value for negotiation. When you compete for tenders or jobs or other things, people would check on your profile page and see who are the people you appreciate the most. Your potential counterparts would then chose to do business with you because you seem like a profitable person who would value their intelligence and efforts or because you're the most relatable person to them.

Of course, in order to prevent the transaction abuse, every sticker transaction would be charged a small amount of transaction taxes.

This idea should serve as an add-on, not a replacement to the current, already working well IP System. But there are some intellectual products that are not covered, and there are people who just don't have the resources to secure a patent.