My Debate/Discussion format idea

The idea is to have a range of time of when the debate/the discussion would be ended, and then at the moderator's discretion the end of the debate/discussion would be executed within the range. It is for the sake of letting the parties debate freely without the restriction of particularities, so it would be like they would do it on the "streets". 

So instead of saying that the debate must finish in an hour, we have between 1 to 2 hours. Both parties would be given the same amount of time, but it would not be specified, one party started talking and then the other party answers, they would go back and forth freely as long as they don't talk over each other relatively speaking. Each time a party talked, their timer would be run, like chess, and eventually the moderator would end the debate by informing the party whose time is lower to match the speaking time of the other party. 

(When the speaking time for both sides have equalized, the debate were completed) 

Now... I know that defending an accusation needs more time than presenting one. However even having a lot of unanswered accusations could be a good thing if you could answer 1 or 2 in a user friendly and satisfactory way. If the audiences were engaged because of you, they would want to hear more. Plus people could point out that the other side wasn't giving out too much answers but focused on attacking too much. 

The moderator also play a crucial role in keeping the quality of the debate good.

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Matthew 6:34, worries and the system of money

Piracy and Expectation

The Golden Sticker v.07