A perspective for the future in avoidance of retardation v.02c

This is my view of Labor's objections. If you want more salaries because the company is doing well,

1. The company's doing well is variable to the will of the customers it's not fixed, so it's going to be bonuses instead of salaries

2. If you want the variables you should be ok to take the lows as well not just the highs

3. As owners get the last shares of the income and still they had to be responsible of the risks of the company as well, including and significantly from employment risks (all kinds including regulation-wise), the risk have to be reduced by abolishing the severance pay.

4. Stop thinking that owners look down upon you unjustly, a lot of times people are protecting their interests as you're being unsatisfied with life and sabotaging and trying to put your misery on them. 

5. Governments, this behavior is the behavior of teenage kids towards their parents, that's what you get for treating people as your children. It's not impossible to do that but with regulation that's coercion and children don't want to be worthy because of coercion they'd feel worthless. 

6. Again communism, don't let people hide behind your competence, and don't hide behind other people's competence and merged as one monster. These competence wants to be rewarded but since they're a part of this communist monster it's a bad idea to reward them. These respectable people became unsatisfied and the gremlins ride on their discontentment as if they are a part of them, and went against the investors.

Competent people, stop mixing with ruiners of assets

------------------------------

As with most things, if a regulation were to be changed the effect is going to apply to the market not instantly. But its going to happen, say the legalization of marijuana in some places; they used to not be able to set up shops, now they could. So when would the rewards be received? When its a good business sense to do so, and it will be.