My Nyap Nyap video v.02b

So I made a nyap nyap video in my gaming channel where I speak random words. The purpose of this is just to make content when I'm bored or to make some kind of weird content where I could sprinkle some brand names or something.

However, neurotic force in the world seems to me always want to make negative meanings of everything so, even when you're nyap nyaping and could consistently be interpreted negatively in a way, it doesn't necessarily mean that its your sayings (the derivative) it could be the encryption key, malintently made, or its just the brainstorming of negative energies around you, to make sense of them. Just, creepy people who wanted to extort people kept on trying to have something on you is an unfortunate existence in this world.

Therefore, I say stop irresponsible neurotic talking where you're stealing contexts to talk about other things that is the person or the people around you. You can't be answered, you can't be corrected, and just a guaranteed dissatisfaction and animosity all rounds. Also the interpreting keys are neuroticism, the most negative meanings are the answer, BAD for the economy.

Why don't we talk clearly, and responsibly so that everyone's mistakes could be understood? Instead of heading towards less and less safe environment, we take the opposite direction and resolves and resolves and resolves.

You have the right to remain silent, everything you said or do could be used against you in the court of who's the biggest bully. Your lawyer is the mercy of the crazy neurotic people and if you retract yourself reputational henchmen/women would be pursuing your bounty. All hail gossip.

What an abomination

Transition to Merit offense mode v.05b

If an economy was sick and tired of being played like a tool and be passive about it by retardation, injustice, and evil, it can choose to went on the offense by being consciously meritocratic.

It might be problematic but I recommend:

1. Reward people less per time and more per job, readyness and availability could be a job as well, but not for everybody, so per job.

2. Reward availability separately from action. Both deserve merit but both are different.

3. Proceed on abolishing severance payment so that people could diversify too not just corporate entities.

4. Print money for heroes like doctors and pay fixed income for their availabilities. Subscription merits. Again these are two different instances.

5. Implement Golden Stickers so that people could contribute to IP and also receive serotonin. But this one doesn't have to be the 5th step, implement this immidiately

In the end I predict constant increase in levels of availabilities in mutual solutions.

In most of my theories though, I don't account for sabotage, its very situational sometimes, thats just the problem people would have to face in all progressions. Also part of what makes humans important.

------------------

Example: 1000 people subscribed to a fire department. Each pay 100 per day so the squad got 100.000 per day.

When there's a fire and it took half day to quench it. They are not paid for availabilities anymore (50.000). The one whose house got burned then rewarded the department for their action, of course he/she would consider his/her sub all this time (+/-). Honestly this part is tricky for me... year of jubilee? 2 parts of subs? Maybe 3 parts is also viable where the third part goes back to the customers with no incidents (an incentive) so this is also an education on saving/investing.

Problem: If somehow 2 houses were on fire at the same time and the department could only helped on one, they might be liable for not only the paid availability money but also the damages since the second house could've contracted some other fire department instead. So in this situation legal professionals would probably had some answers.

This is why people don't trust you with money v.04e

If you hate on some "rich" person claiming that he didn't deserve that much money, that means that the money he/she got or the assets he/she got was debt not owned. So which one is it? Has he or hasn't he been paid for his/her deeds?

Edit:

So if he was claimed to had not been deserving for what he/she had, that means he had always been in debt, therefore even when the claim was only partial, when he had ever been not in debt? (The sentiment brought upon sum of double minuses, or more cause you're basically claiming random things that he/she owned at any points in spacetime, which would translate to, everything!)

So this is why irresponsible talking is the one at fault, especially because money is official and written in value, it is always going to be in conflict with the culture.

Is this the love of money? In a limited sense yeah when money is about honesty. Anyone even non christians should be able to relate that the bad love of money means to prefer money than paying people their due, or to prefer money than to actually solve the problem tasked. 

---------------------------------

So if you are not going to say why and how one has been overpaid or another has been underpaid out in the open, responsibly gave the platform for rebuttal, don't act on it. 

Edit: Even when you've said it openly and received your responses you should still observe the law, or to have discretion over your actions whether it is good or not.

What time is it? v.03b

Labor Unions should cut it out on being communists. Why can't you guys be like the "Accountants' union", "Engineer Union", "Medical Doctors Unions" ?? What makes you different from them? 

But you guys are so insecure, sensitive, and at the edge of violence because your dignity was shared... absorbed by those who don't deserve it. 

Is minimum salary meritocratic? at micro obviously not, at macro given the time of rampant labor piracy yes and that's as a whole, in general. When people have stopped being pirates then the relativity would shift but I'm not here for that. Is severance payment meritocratic? It is as if someone looked at meritocracy in the face and say f you, then created severance payment. They are both different. 

------------------------

You know what's the problem with communism? They average everything, the best to the worst, the good to the bad, they mix it making this gooey brown golden sh** concoction of dissatisfaction, insecurity, jealousy and malice.

------------------------

The military industrial complex is not going to run out of business in the time of meritocracy (if done properly), because there's always scumbags pure scumbags that wanted to take away from merit. There... isn't that solves the dillema? Just be meritocratic (policy/law, audit, Truthfully)

Weapon crackdown

 I was thinking how to reduce the risk of undocumented weapons. 

You could use high punishment and low punishment. For example if you produced your own weapon you're subject to punishment but if you didn't brand your weapon then its definitely more malicious, so at least brand your weapons as yours. 

If the people wanted to buy undocumented weapons as well as the info about its whereabouts (in order to track them down), attributable weapons are clear from unbranded weapons so the people could focus more on the unbranded weapons.

False brands are subject to intellectual property violation, but its illegal?, slander and defamation yes but also trademark leeching too. The violation wasn't necessarily against the trademark owner but against justice.

Equilibrium Tax v.06 (Bad)

Despite the amount of money issued by banks/central banks, there's this thing when the circuits of commerce reached an equilibrium of price. The difference between the amount of active money in the equilibrium circuits and the total money issued are the magnitude of risks of the equilibrium disruption in total. The manifestation of the risk could be dispersed throughout different circuits such as the circuit of food disturbances, the circuit of oil / gas, the circuit of currencies, etc, or it may be focused on one. 

In order to reduce the impact of the disturbance the government may implement equilibrium tax, when all extraordinary flows of money were taxed like vat. The proceeds would be used to lessen the problems caused by the disturbance. Obviously we also would want to identify whether the disturbanced were maliciously orchestrated or were they just common scarcities or curiousity phenomenons / marketing phenomenons. 

The problem is the magnitude or the percentage of taxes were determined by the authority (as with any other taxes and freights) therefore we need some kind of measures to anchor how should the tax be set. As illustration cars, houses, and mobile phones are not frequent flows of goods therefore most likely it wouldn't be relevant. Rents and salaries though are frequent but we want the people to be able to move around more in this case, especially towards the rural or new areas. 

Not all equilibrium taxes are the same and the subjects could also vary from individuals or groups. However if one were to anticipate group labelling to prevent coordinated attacks, one must also consider the time factor, the space factor, the context factor where and when some individuals could be relevant for the label, because things could oscillates or orbiting around in label, and such too would be correct. 

Housing prices could be weird though, because they were meant to locals and even though foreign participation could be good for the economy, similar impact could be emulated if they "disturbed" the property supplies. But is the equilibrium tax or similar would be the right solution? or the only solution? weird cause housing really is not a frequency thing.

Now this concern I think is the most important for me, education causes disturbances in the equilibrium. When people became smarter, the equilibrium changes... now this, THIS is the inherent job of the current style government already, must be, so no extra work this is the job of any governments. So and so all the more reason to implement ways so that they could focus firstly on this. 

At the end of the day when one has became a part of a circuit, he/she/it wouldn't be disturbing anymore. They? could be, of course

-----------------

Edit: Everything is the government's job, yeah 

------------------

Edit2: Shit now I realized, we are fighting against entropy here. We can not do this

A Case for Peace, and why Nuclear war is away v.05d

Simply put we are at peace because of goodness in the world. I mean the goodness in this world outweighed the bad, and that's also another reason to support our governments. But which side of the government? Definitely not the corrupt side because that's not good. Good things are harmonious, they support each other, and that's why peace is definitely good.

So the misconception that I wanted to argue here is that the chaotic side of the people, the things that are not clear, are not good because they reduce the power of property. When we transact outside the realm of officialness there should be a strict discipline not to traverse beyond the lines of official properties. You can't insinuate that "oh that thing is officially yours but that's not actually yours you know", property is property and because property is property the danger that's over there threatens the property that is over here. "If what I have is not truly mine then what difference would it make if everything collapsed?"

So Law and Contracts and above that Justice is the pure good side that's carrying us all. Could Justice be unofficial? definitely, and if so we should be able to make a case for it out in the open. Does the obscure side of countries and companies, such as the intelligence and corporate espionage are always bad? No but how could we draw the line if we couldn't tell apart good from bad? 

But this post is about nuclear safety not all about unofficial careers, even though beyond my knowledge such might be mostly relevant in some obscure way.

----------------------------------

People said this generation might be a weak generation that's going to create "difficult times", yet people also don't want implement clearness and black on whiteness making those who are not reciprocal or those who aren't grateful obvious. So, what would be the solutions? War on the innocents? No! Let's just stand our ground and fight when the enemy was being the enemy. 

Every era has its solutions, why are we living in delusions? Say reality is now but its nothing but an illusion. The Truth is not all fiction, the part that wants to be Itself is not the part that doesn't. So break apart and tear apart, cause what the other one is is just not wanting to be alone in its desire for self destruction.