I don't know what the title is supposed to be... "Women"? v.02c

What's the most irresponsible Gender in the world?

That's not fair, not all women, and I agree that's right, but that's the problem. When you're scrutinized you went spread, when you're attacking you went united, "Believe all women" really? is that really the solution? and you knew that it is wrong as well, but I think not all of you knew that the solution is the opposite of that? But hey who cares not that I'm going to be responsible for perpetuating all that, right?

Harvey Weinstein for example or people like that, let's not use him in particular. People like him could've been just a regular perverted guy who started of just keeping it to himself, but because of his position lots of women, or guys, gave him plenty of sugars, and then he got addicted. I'm not a psychologist, just seeing the news and rumours that kept on being repeated about some high stakes deals in businesses. So, "Believe all women" should be "Scrutinize all women" wouldn't it? like we scrutinize men. Where were all of those cookie monsters, the sugary dealers when Harvey Weinstein went to court? Where were all the women judges in the layer of the undocumentable unwritten gossip world (unproperly speakable), the part of the world that doesn't supposed to exist. The maintainers of this filth, where are your judges? Then after that some would blame men for not believing women, no, you victimized yourselves by going out into the market world, the business world, forcing people to not be able to scrutinize you like everybody else, defining a new kind of cruelty that's not actually cruelty, and would not be culturally cruelty when applied to men. 

I don't hate women I hate the fact that they get away with things and ended up making the reality of what actually are good, their enemies because of that.

My Nyap Nyap video v.02b

So I made a nyap nyap video in my gaming channel where I speak random words. The purpose of this is just to make content when I'm bored or to make some kind of weird content where I could sprinkle some brand names or something.

However, neurotic force in the world seems to me always want to make negative meanings of everything so, even when you're nyap nyaping and could consistently be interpreted negatively in a way, it doesn't necessarily mean that its your sayings (the derivative) it could be the encryption key, malintently made, or its just the brainstorming of negative energies around you, to make sense of them. Just, creepy people who wanted to extort people kept on trying to have something on you is an unfortunate existence in this world.

Therefore, I say stop irresponsible neurotic talking where you're stealing contexts to talk about other things that is the person or the people around you. You can't be answered, you can't be corrected, and just a guaranteed dissatisfaction and animosity all rounds. Also the interpreting keys are neuroticism, the most negative meanings are the answer, BAD for the economy.

Why don't we talk clearly, and responsibly so that everyone's mistakes could be understood? Instead of heading towards less and less safe environment, we take the opposite direction and resolves and resolves and resolves.

You have the right to remain silent, everything you said or do could be used against you in the court of who's the biggest bully. Your lawyer is the mercy of the crazy neurotic people and if you retract yourself reputational henchmen/women would be pursuing your bounty. All hail gossip.

What an abomination

Transition to Merit offense mode v.05b

If an economy was sick and tired of being played like a tool and be passive about it by retardation, injustice, and evil, it can choose to went on the offense by being consciously meritocratic.

It might be problematic but I recommend:

1. Reward people less per time and more per job, readyness and availability could be a job as well, but not for everybody, so per job.

2. Reward availability separately from action. Both deserve merit but both are different.

3. Proceed on abolishing severance payment so that people could diversify too not just corporate entities.

4. Print money for heroes like doctors and pay fixed income for their availabilities. Subscription merits. Again these are two different instances.

5. Implement Golden Stickers so that people could contribute to IP and also receive serotonin. But this one doesn't have to be the 5th step, implement this immidiately

In the end I predict constant increase in levels of availabilities in mutual solutions.

In most of my theories though, I don't account for sabotage, its very situational sometimes, thats just the problem people would have to face in all progressions. Also part of what makes humans important.

------------------

Example: 1000 people subscribed to a fire department. Each pay 100 per day so the squad got 100.000 per day.

When there's a fire and it took half day to quench it. They are not paid for availabilities anymore (50.000). The one whose house got burned then rewarded the department for their action, of course he/she would consider his/her sub all this time (+/-). Honestly this part is tricky for me... year of jubilee? 2 parts of subs? Maybe 3 parts is also viable where the third part goes back to the customers with no incidents (an incentive) so this is also an education on saving/investing.

Problem: If somehow 2 houses were on fire at the same time and the department could only helped on one, they might be liable for not only the paid availability money but also the damages since the second house could've contracted some other fire department instead. So in this situation legal professionals would probably had some answers.

This is why people don't trust you with money v.04e

If you hate on some "rich" person claiming that he didn't deserve that much money, that means that the money he/she got or the assets he/she got was debt not owned. So which one is it? Has he or hasn't he been paid for his/her deeds?

Edit:

So if he was claimed to had not been deserving for what he/she had, that means he had always been in debt, therefore even when the claim was only partial, when he had ever been not in debt? (The sentiment brought upon sum of double minuses, or more cause you're basically claiming random things that he/she owned at any points in spacetime, which would translate to, everything!)

So this is why irresponsible talking is the one at fault, especially because money is official and written in value, it is always going to be in conflict with the culture.

Is this the love of money? In a limited sense yeah when money is about honesty. Anyone even non christians should be able to relate that the bad love of money means to prefer money than paying people their due, or to prefer money than to actually solve the problem tasked. 

---------------------------------

So if you are not going to say why and how one has been overpaid or another has been underpaid out in the open, responsibly gave the platform for rebuttal, don't act on it. 

Edit: Even when you've said it openly and received your responses you should still observe the law, or to have discretion over your actions whether it is good or not.

What time is it? v.03b

Labor Unions should cut it out on being communists. Why can't you guys be like the "Accountants' union", "Engineer Union", "Medical Doctors Unions" ?? What makes you different from them? 

But you guys are so insecure, sensitive, and at the edge of violence because your dignity was shared... absorbed by those who don't deserve it. 

Is minimum salary meritocratic? at micro obviously not, at macro given the time of rampant labor piracy yes and that's as a whole, in general. When people have stopped being pirates then the relativity would shift but I'm not here for that. Is severance payment meritocratic? It is as if someone looked at meritocracy in the face and say f you, then created severance payment. They are both different. 

------------------------

You know what's the problem with communism? They average everything, the best to the worst, the good to the bad, they mix it making this gooey brown golden sh** concoction of dissatisfaction, insecurity, jealousy and malice.

------------------------

The military industrial complex is not going to run out of business in the time of meritocracy (if done properly), because there's always scumbags pure scumbags that wanted to take away from merit. There... isn't that solves the dillema? Just be meritocratic (policy/law, audit, Truthfully)

Weapon crackdown

 I was thinking how to reduce the risk of undocumented weapons. 

You could use high punishment and low punishment. For example if you produced your own weapon you're subject to punishment but if you didn't brand your weapon then its definitely more malicious, so at least brand your weapons as yours. 

If the people wanted to buy undocumented weapons as well as the info about its whereabouts (in order to track them down), attributable weapons are clear from unbranded weapons so the people could focus more on the unbranded weapons.

False brands are subject to intellectual property violation, but its illegal?, slander and defamation yes but also trademark leeching too. The violation wasn't necessarily against the trademark owner but against justice.

Equilibrium Tax v.06 (Bad)

Despite the amount of money issued by banks/central banks, there's this thing when the circuits of commerce reached an equilibrium of price. The difference between the amount of active money in the equilibrium circuits and the total money issued are the magnitude of risks of the equilibrium disruption in total. The manifestation of the risk could be dispersed throughout different circuits such as the circuit of food disturbances, the circuit of oil / gas, the circuit of currencies, etc, or it may be focused on one. 

In order to reduce the impact of the disturbance the government may implement equilibrium tax, when all extraordinary flows of money were taxed like vat. The proceeds would be used to lessen the problems caused by the disturbance. Obviously we also would want to identify whether the disturbanced were maliciously orchestrated or were they just common scarcities or curiousity phenomenons / marketing phenomenons. 

The problem is the magnitude or the percentage of taxes were determined by the authority (as with any other taxes and freights) therefore we need some kind of measures to anchor how should the tax be set. As illustration cars, houses, and mobile phones are not frequent flows of goods therefore most likely it wouldn't be relevant. Rents and salaries though are frequent but we want the people to be able to move around more in this case, especially towards the rural or new areas. 

Not all equilibrium taxes are the same and the subjects could also vary from individuals or groups. However if one were to anticipate group labelling to prevent coordinated attacks, one must also consider the time factor, the space factor, the context factor where and when some individuals could be relevant for the label, because things could oscillates or orbiting around in label, and such too would be correct. 

Housing prices could be weird though, because they were meant to locals and even though foreign participation could be good for the economy, similar impact could be emulated if they "disturbed" the property supplies. But is the equilibrium tax or similar would be the right solution? or the only solution? weird cause housing really is not a frequency thing.

Now this concern I think is the most important for me, education causes disturbances in the equilibrium. When people became smarter, the equilibrium changes... now this, THIS is the inherent job of the current style government already, must be, so no extra work this is the job of any governments. So and so all the more reason to implement ways so that they could focus firstly on this. 

At the end of the day when one has became a part of a circuit, he/she/it wouldn't be disturbing anymore. They? could be, of course

-----------------

Edit: Everything is the government's job, yeah 

------------------

Edit2: Shit now I realized, we are fighting against entropy here. We can not do this

A Case for Peace, and why Nuclear war is away v.05d

Simply put we are at peace because of goodness in the world. I mean the goodness in this world outweighed the bad, and that's also another reason to support our governments. But which side of the government? Definitely not the corrupt side because that's not good. Good things are harmonious, they support each other, and that's why peace is definitely good.

So the misconception that I wanted to argue here is that the chaotic side of the people, the things that are not clear, are not good because they reduce the power of property. When we transact outside the realm of officialness there should be a strict discipline not to traverse beyond the lines of official properties. You can't insinuate that "oh that thing is officially yours but that's not actually yours you know", property is property and because property is property the danger that's over there threatens the property that is over here. "If what I have is not truly mine then what difference would it make if everything collapsed?"

So Law and Contracts and above that Justice is the pure good side that's carrying us all. Could Justice be unofficial? definitely, and if so we should be able to make a case for it out in the open. Does the obscure side of countries and companies, such as the intelligence and corporate espionage are always bad? No but how could we draw the line if we couldn't tell apart good from bad? 

But this post is about nuclear safety not all about unofficial careers, even though beyond my knowledge such might be mostly relevant in some obscure way.

----------------------------------

People said this generation might be a weak generation that's going to create "difficult times", yet people also don't want implement clearness and black on whiteness making those who are not reciprocal or those who aren't grateful obvious. So, what would be the solutions? War on the innocents? No! Let's just stand our ground and fight when the enemy was being the enemy. 

Every era has its solutions, why are we living in delusions? Say reality is now but its nothing but an illusion. The Truth is not all fiction, the part that wants to be Itself is not the part that doesn't. So break apart and tear apart, cause what the other one is is just not wanting to be alone in its desire for self destruction.

The Turtle just can't win the race

A lot of times solutions need hard work to maintain, when people work hard and won against problems that's glorious. Hard work comes with plus and minuses that's just the way it is. The Turtle is trying to minimize the minus by looking at the law while the rabbit took the jump and risked it. 

Both could be glorious on their own merit, but when the Turtle gets ahead that means the Rabbit experienced a lot of minuses and a tragedy has happened. These rabbits suddenly became re:zero, they are the victim and the "lazy" turtle is the one to blame, they swarmed the turtle and took from it what "supposed" to be their expected rewards. They should've always be ahead of the low lives Turtles. 

So for you guys who actually have spent for accountants, lawyers, notaries, and admin staffs I applaud you all. Becareful of the wounded Rabbits some of them are looking at you in envy and the consequences of you breaking even a little bit of law is somewhat multiplied by the factor of their spite.

Money Matters v.04

Money Matters because it is clearly written. You might rely on people to help you out without money and that works, but not all the time. 

So not loving money should not be interpreted towards, putting your faith in the worse direction.

The point of money is administering help, being reciprocal, and being accurate in terms of magnitude.

Help doesn't need money all the time, but if you could make things easier and smoother with money, why choose what is harder?

---------------------

So here's an argument, people who love money preferred to not give money, instead they just gave gestures. 

(Of course this is just symptoms, evil people tend to want to use what people are saying for crooked meanings) 

So what does proper attitude towards money is supposed to be? Proverb 3:28

Motto Motto v.02

The Spirit of Truth is God

Improve one's self to be Just and to be able to live in the Law. 

Let's make "After Law is Freedom" real

Talk through the front door, be auditable, be accountable (Psalm 139:23-24)

Kill Evil, make evil dead 

The next step of human civilization v.03d

Throughout our time we have learned top bottom leaderships, we have produced history and laws pertaining the ins and outs of governments and institutional coordination. But there are just things that can't be solved top bottom, the pervalence of its focus, the relevance of its mission has begun to really saturate. 

Next is the people, we need the people to be responsible and how to be a responsible "being lead" people or how to be a good nakama is going to be the legacy of our time. 

----------------------------

Cause it is now the question of to whom the technology serves, rather than oh these helpless people...

If we won't acknowledge this and take up our duty to be good, the whole thing might embrace the regress towards the past again, such out of the inclination to use tools that are relevant for that time. 

I mean that's normal and reasonable to look to the past and recoordinate but if the past is poor and undesirable, and that's the tool we have to thrive in such world... abandon those tools.

----------------------------

What is "Just" in my point of view is an economy that's dynamic where mesh is utilized, centralized is utilized and people come and go and dance in harmony. Being at the top would be glorious but also only flows, or only natural and when you do you do when you're not you're not any less admirable/honorable. 

Invest in diversified portfolio, your property is your own. Leadership is a responsibility not a reward.

The Bargaining Chip of the Bullying Demon v.05

Look what I'm going to write here is just my side of the matter, like describing an elephant in the dark. Although I concluded that people are not talking about this conspicuously. 

The problem starts with people are not appreciating teachers enough. Which in turn built momentum towards under appreciation of the press, because you supposed to appreciate good information but you've built the habit of dismissing it. Then sponsors came and its getting more and more unpleasant for the reporters to talk against the interests of the sponsors. 

So the skewedness of the news, and then after a while arise this hostility against criticism. Because what sells in the market had been built on top of this reputation sterile from the "fire". Then comes innovation and people started to realize that businesses fall due to innovation and "spreading too thin" is a thing that could kill an industry. 

But instead of telling people that, the customers, they use underhanded communications and virtue signalled towards the administrations that had existed or the mentality that had existed that is spiteful towards criticism. Why is this happening? Probably people thought that there's some competitive edge in keeping this "understanding", probably they wanted to look down on other people, probably they wanted to show themselves or the girl that they wanted to coitus copulum with that they're good at flirting? maybe other things I don't know. The point is now we got difficulties for entrepreneurs to spread their words out, and artificially augmented risks of getting bad reputation. 

Am I right about this? I think this is logical but I have no journal article references. 

Anyway my eerie concern is that the kids kept on being bullied or bullying itself had their grip in our cultures because of this. This is the bargaining chips of the demon of bullying. Some kids don't understand about this, some people wanted to specialize in other things than politics such as math, art, philosophy, etc. Instead of sharing this concerns through the front door, bullying had became the means instead. Judging from the book of Psalms bullying had been gathering momentum for thousands of years already. 

But this is retarded, all we got to do is say it. I'm not saying this is the cause of the culture of bullying, but this is probably 60%. Could we stop this already, its not going to be easy even though it is such a monkey thing for us humans with developed brains to be experiencing, but it is what it is. We got to do something about it. 

--------------------------------

Have faith have logic, innovation increases the level of availability of mutual solutions. You can't stifle innovation without consequences that's a price that must be paid. And I DON'T WANT TO PAY YOUR FAULT please isolate the consequences on yourself. Of course there's a season for everything, the level of availability may not increase in an instant so now, negotiation through the front door or official means is the right way to go. Just consider innovation as more sacred than zero sum, not the most sacred thing like human lives, but treat it like it is and don't violate it. 

Traffic Jam solution anticipate v.02

Governments had apps for COVID prevention, so judging from such organization they could also administer similarly with traffic jams. 

At busy hours people would put in their destination before driving and then like an airplane traffic controller, the police is going to use an app to notify you whether it is time to enter the traffic or not. Such scheme probably had been talked about if not prepared, but just something prevented it from being implemented massively. 

However I'd say that there shouldn't be a law that punishes people for breaking this organization. It could be done just by implementing it without extra law. Before anyone become "violators" you could set up barriers like freeway entrances that would be opened by barcode scans from people's phones

Lazyness (2023) v.04b

I found that Lazyness is a manifestation of multiple types of problems. That's why its so tricky to formulize. There are explanations about laziness, for example in the past I defined it as lack of diversification, there is another explanation as well out of a research result, pointing to uncertainty and certainty balance (healthygamergg, youtube 2023).

Now I wanted to say that it could come at an isolated field, where you're lazy for a thing but not for other things. I think this is about going 100 km/h towards the darkness, yes the uncertainty again but this one is tricky for the solution of building up certainties might help but not "targeted". Imagine a room where the terrain is not a certain flat tile but sometimes rocks, water, different elevations, even treadmills. Of course if something is lazy means you would already know how to finish it but its not about the work but about the world that the work takes you to. 

The solution seems simple but surprisingly has conscious resistances from forces around you, which is to turn on the light. I dare to say that this is expensive and political because its lazy already otherwise it wouldn't be lazy it would just be intuitive. However, hopefully you would work around that and ignore your unreasonable anxiety, becareful not to leak the lazyness into different areas of your life given at the grand scheme of things everything has a momentum. 

-------------------------

If you're stable and being contributive but the environment ended up becoming more of a menace to you or becoming more interruptive of you based on that, it might not be a crime but that environment is definitely toxic on you. Vice versa if you found that your contribution breeds even more clearance, then that's a nice spot. 

Now be careful that it is easy then to be the one that is evil. A stable contribution followed by instability could catch people off guard and be considered evil, this should not be a problem if people lived by pen on paperness or contract (so contingency is always available). Contrast that to lack of clear articulation, people would always had to live by intuitions and gestures. In the later case you're socially deemed responsible (without being in writing or said clearly) for your "comfortable" behavior, which is a vulnerable thing for a person and also unnatural, not mentioning those who have decisive shares were not deep in their investments on justice. 

So legalities or clear articulation is indeed good property.

Concerns over promiscuity

Firstly my preconceived notion about sex is that it's subconscious and an evolutionary product. You'd be subconsciously compelled to be the family, helper, protector, of this particular person. 

1. Would this aggregation of personalities be a human?

2. Would this entity be able to correct you if you're wrong about him/her. There might be a risk of somebody who's not a part of that aggregation hacked into your feedback loop at the subconscious level.

3. Would this entity be an angel or a demon? Or would it attenuates?

4. Am I wrong? Am I half right?

5. Is it actually beneficial to keep track of this at the societal level? I know its also a part of the evolution of humanity, but what if we could tell it apart and made choices?

Safe deposit box insurance market application idea v.02b

So last week CNBC posted the 2023 Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. Watching this inspires me this idea:

An application for safe deposit box where by putting your assets in the safe deposit box up for insurance shares, you could obtain the income from insurance premiums from prominent insurance companies in exchange of collaterals which are contents of your safe deposit box. They could be gold, silver, property certificates etc. 

People could obtain income and insurance companies could have an alternative to allocate their risks to.

------------------------------

Additionally someone who couldn't repay their debts could probably apply to insurance companies like geico for an extention. The way it works would be, the insurance company would buy the collaterized property, let the borrowers extended their debts while they use the property as repayments of new debts. 

So the new debts would be repaid by "title to the address and everything on it" instead of cash. 

 

Practical Interest Rate for Mortgage v.06b

Pay attention to the auction price of your collateral, how much lower is it from the market price and is it consistently so. So from that number take the difference out, all of the money you paid including the principal up until now is the Practical Interest rate. It is only no longer interest, or had became the principal when it had passed that threshhold. (Still passed that threshhold it is going to be part principal and part interests ok not 100%).

If you ended up selling the property at market price then its your "profit", if things got sour and prices dropped, at least the market price would be the auction price and you've factored in your interest payments as interest payments.

---------------------

If the tax office would acknowledge this, then one could have a setup where there's extra cost at the start of your credit, or alternatively throughout the early periods, and then if in the end the credit was successful the tax would be charged. If the credit was a fail then its not going to be taxed.

Isn't it reasonable given the income tax wanted to take a share on profit? So it shouldn't take away from non profit transactions. 

Moreover the government seems to like credit and considered it to be a part of its product or something. Its encouraged what I was trying to say. So why not this option?

---------------------

On the other side of the credit, shouldn't the lender/bank recorded instant repayment because of the collateral, therefore revenue? No because lets say that at the end of the credit they would recorded it as cost again when they "returned" the collateral, such practice is not conservative, its contingent towards income which is uncertain. So not an option

This then gives rise to the interests losses incurred by the government out of the whole scheme. Such is the properness of it, that is the articulation of risk exposure of the whole economy when one got into debt.

Pay attention to the first paragraph about "revenue" that's wrong, the bank or lender wouldn't incur revenues at all because the difference between market and the actual proceeds of the collateral wasn't going to be a revenue for the bank / lender. Therefore it is a real risk of debt or a real cost of the economy as a whole when one got into debt. 

----------------------

Here's the thing, is having a child easier than getting into debt? Just the nature of things that order drew from chaos while proceeding forward. Therefore the right attitude is to understand and acknowledge.

Watch: CNBC's coverage of Berkshire Hathaway's annual meeting. Minute 35:55 is particularly relevant. Here Warren made a position proposition about AI and compared it to the World War, and then they answered another question about the real estate. 

A perspective for the future in avoidance of retardation v.02c

This is my view of Labor's objections. If you want more salaries because the company is doing well,

1. The company's doing well is variable to the will of the customers it's not fixed, so it's going to be bonuses instead of salaries

2. If you want the variables you should be ok to take the lows as well not just the highs

3. As owners get the last shares of the income and still they had to be responsible of the risks of the company as well, including and significantly from employment risks (all kinds including regulation-wise), the risk have to be reduced by abolishing the severance pay.

4. Stop thinking that owners look down upon you unjustly, a lot of times people are protecting their interests as you're being unsatisfied with life and sabotaging and trying to put your misery on them. 

5. Governments, this behavior is the behavior of teenage kids towards their parents, that's what you get for treating people as your children. It's not impossible to do that but with regulation that's coercion and children don't want to be worthy because of coercion they'd feel worthless. 

6. Again communism, don't let people hide behind your competence, and don't hide behind other people's competence and merged as one monster. These competence wants to be rewarded but since they're a part of this communist monster it's a bad idea to reward them. These respectable people became unsatisfied and the gremlins ride on their discontentment as if they are a part of them, and went against the investors.

Competent people, stop mixing with ruiners of assets

------------------------------

As with most things, if a regulation were to be changed the effect is going to apply to the market not instantly. But its going to happen, say the legalization of marijuana in some places; they used to not be able to set up shops, now they could. So when would the rewards be received? When its a good business sense to do so, and it will be. 

Romantic relations in the workplace v.04b

When a couple broke up, or there were "casual" relationships happening in the workplace, arguments or disagreements now it's harder to settle with setting up space between the people, there's got to be hierarchy. Contrast this to a person who's not involved, differences in opinion is to be expected and discussed, negotiated. By expected it means that it should be enough and the problem usually settles, so it is kind of sus that when such solutions wouldn't work anymore why is that the case? 

Non meritocratic hierarchy as well makes things more difficult to pass... why? Am I right, or it's just me? Frictions that supposed to be normal and respected now becomes "betrayal" why so intense bro? When it had became a culture, hive culture, those who are not involved themselves got to be expected the same out of them... they'd be like we didn't sign up for this.

----------------------

Additional feature of the hive is that it could be a sanctuary for those who commit fraud due to its hostility against scrutiny or criticism

----------------------

Another bastardation would be inappropriate mistake punishments / social punishment, the culture that decent person is one who makes no mistakes. This is a force innitiation trick in order to force potential "risk" to become a part of the hive, since everyone makes mistakes there's going to be a time where the risk is going to make one, then the only (hopefully not) safe places would be hives. They appear to be fighting sometimes but for the sake of frauds they'd cover each other (I'm deriving this out of motives). Although there are indeed dire mistakes, so don't use this post to disrespect instructions.

Innuendo needs to stop v.02

In my previous post I feel like some people are going to assosiate it with the internal issues in Indonesia because I'm a Chinese Indonesian. Could a gay man talk about a guy in the context of the topic only without being assosiated with his gayness? Could a person with a gunshot wound talk about guns without it being associated with his wounds? It's possible that people would want to do that. Could we have that in the world please?

(Because obviously everything has its own context especially things that are intense needs its own context to be put in perspective. You can't steal from another context and then decide what other people are saying, idiots, and why do I have to take responsibility to talk about something in context just because I talked about something else? who gave me money to talk about your agenda? not you)

All in all the culture of innuendo needs to stop. It's as if people spraying oil everywhere and one day somebody is going to light up a match for a candle or something and he's going to be blamed for things going in flames. Stop spraying oil everywhere! Take accountability for your words and settle things on the spot. 

Overlooked element of slavery

Not being in the law, as if having money but just a paper, land certificate but by words of mouth, marriage certificates but mere romantic promises. 

So is it really the lack of salaries that defines the whole slavery? Or is it the lack of order of freedom that opens up paths to consensus? Because these companies are actually exerting an effort to reach out, unlike other companies. Some of them are greatly immoral and irresponsible, but are they the representation of what's actually happening? These "slaves" are given chances and jobs. 

Then through the cheapness of prices, haven't we opened up new kinds of jobs for ourselves? I'm not saying it is flawless but globalization is opening up new dynamics where the devastation of another place is being dispersed to another place. We must approach our conclusions with discretion, is it really the low salaries that's causing all of this? Or is it the tapping into the dire circumstances of other parts of realities?

Probably both but I propose that if you change things around in that "slums" so would be better the whole circuits. With the betterment of the economy comes bargaining power, negotiation sensibilities, the stronger spirit of independence for all, sustainable and diversified resources for the mutual solutions of life. 

The moral of the story is, do it in moderation and do it libertarian. That's my consideration

Monetization of my contents v.03

All of my contents are monetizable exclusively for me, for my own interests. In the event of my death no other exclusive monetization is allowed, all of my contents should be monetizable by everybody after my death.

Terms that I've made still applies, don't get me wrong, including open source or similar because they were made to serve my interests. 

However the future is beyond me, therefore people should not own my contents exclusively after my death (including such license that would be called "open source" then but had exclusive ownership clauses or made such).

Recipe to innovation

Technology is born out of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. Being a child means something like this, even though children hate it when they're wrong, their world is full of mistakes and they're adjusting it all the time. So that's where we are still not getting it yet, the catalyst is to keep away the "political" image as if mistakes are not part of the equation for a "decent" person. 

You have to always budget for mistakes. 

Such political campaigns have gotten too far to the point where people expected it out of public figures and even their business partners. Albeit corruption is abusing that budget but so is the case for everything else that's corrupted. We should stop this stupid image that mistakes are not to be budgeted out of people, and start embracing new technologies

Gangs and Slavery v.02

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are so limited because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions. 

People make gangs and groups in order to secure resources, that's ok but we want to distinguisih the grain from the parasitic weeds. Let's acknowledge that the best kind of prosperity is when inventors could come together and make things better, at the same time exclusively obtained their rewards without being stolen or robbed. Gangs or groups are liable for non-inventors to get rewards as well and that's an incentive to break apart inventors from one another. These non-inventors could actually be people who are working together behind the scenes to keep inventors apart from each other, so that there's always excuses to get something out of royalties or what meant to be proper rewards. 

Divide and conquer? Yes but the "conquer" is in a form of self sabotage as well. While some inventors ended up getting nothing because of this setup, call it "competition", opportunities for collaboration is damaged even more. Although we shouldn't be too quick to judge, because we ourselves have our own seeds of parasitism that we should always keep in check. Marketing "people" for example should be rewarded for their "brand" but often times they didn't get it, the same way clerical excellence should have royalties over their working papers that they shared but no... 

We shouldn't let pointless clan mentality hinder our appreciation of other people's ingenuities. The ultimate form of property is the exclusivism of justice apart from injustice

What CPA has become and why we need different certifications as well v.04

 I'm just going to get to the point:

CPA if compared to medical doctors is a person who mastered all specializations and could recreated the whole body altogether. So he's an expert neurosurgeon, expert oncologist, expert eye surgeon, expert internist, etc. Accountants who work specifically in procurements, or salaries and taxes, taxes, sales, treasury, etc are like the specialists and there's the intern who's more like a GP. 

Of course they are much less complicated and less stake to deal with compared to the medicine counterparts but as the time goes on the gap is getting closer and closer in different parts of the world / contexts. Pay attention to the distribution as well, the magnitude of responsibility that a CPA must take is much more closer towards that analogy compared to the gap between the lesser more simple encapsulations. So the distribution of responsibility here is getting skewed more heavily for the higher level accountants. 

IASB in my opinion wants to keep the scope of the CPA which I think is fine, however in the business world there are more and more businesses that requires more and more accountants and not all of them needs all the things a CPA should have all the time, but in order to be able to do some of the jobs, many of the jobs, one must be a CPA. 

Moreover the market still thinks that the accountants are just accountants and they rarely distinguish or could comprehend the difference between the professors, masters, and the bachelors. Yes, I'm talking about the payments, some expected more out of every accountants including the regular ones, some expected less from the CPAs. Some need CPAs but don't have the money to because the sizes of their businesses, so increase the demands for the "lesser CPAs". It's getting more and more tempting to be a CPA now but the demand for the quality of the skills required is less. 

We need to legalize some more certifications that are more in between

------------------------

Edit: (Help)

Accountants deserve not less, but surgeons and medical researchers are grossly-grossly underpaid (although what people could afford are what people could afford). 

So please don't reduce them, it's evil

Renewing my articulation of the Truth v.03

The Truth is the protocol that everything follows, therefore the True past is the past that is rendered exclusively using the Truth.

Outside of the Truth is not the Truth therefore the past that's rendered with hybrid protocols is not holy (if it's represented as the True Truth).

The Construction of the Enemy v.05b

Since I'm a Christian I believe in the Spirit of Truth. 

The Truth is about there's only one past, one True past. 

Now the argument against being in the side of Christianity is the accumulation of pain. In the realm of Truth there is accumulation of pain, while in the realm of the "enemy chaos" everything that's not the Truth, you could have multiple past and therefore pain is not real when you looked at it that way or whatever. Therefore the only benefit of the Truth is that to reveal this Anti-Truth dimension which probably could be achieved by accelerating a particle or something beyond the speed of light until emerge this reality where quantum possibilities extended through time negatively. Or whatever

I'll point out that this is depression, meaninglessness. Also if you could be disciplined about a realm that's completely out of the norm, going out of your way to there like that, why wouldn't you use that to eliminate sufferings in the Truth itself? It already has precedence and we are making progresses, why not have that instead of going against that and making it harder for people like me who want that?

Edit: I mean not to demean great scientific achievements, I'm against the spirit of going against the Truth. Such that would normalize lying and encourage it, and thing they are better than people like me. They would create policies and change infrastructures irresponsibly including attacking language upon we review each other. Scientific experiments though are great especially because they are scientific and open. 

Edit2 Fri, 7th 2023

I watched Heaven Sent Honey (https://youtu.be/DjSE-naY1Xw) today talking about the cult of Dyonisus, and somehow it got me thinking of how; apart from the order of the Truth, lies would be something that's close to real, that it would be torture if the lie was violent. False pasts that are evil but not real, would be like a nightmare but there's no Truth upon where the permanent cure, permanent solutions for them would be hinged on. No reality to wake up to, just a jump to another dream... no progress 

----------------------------

Apart from the point of views of Truth vs Anti-Truth we got the Primordial which contains both, the Chaos. If you're trapped in there sufferings would be real, would be not, yourself would be and suddenly would be something else, and nothing, and everything. Tommorow exists but it could be the day before yesterday, or, now. 

Trapped in such dimension one might experience extreme joy but also extreme pain and the next thing you know it didn't exist. The next thing you know, what is next? What is know? 

Bearing a child arguably could mean pulling him/her out of that dimension, if you considered that a jail, that would be a good thing, if you considered it a peace that would be a bad thing. The point is the order of Truth wants to give that sequences and so, hope for the complete control/choices about what's desirable and what's not. For me that's freedom, for you it maybe not. 

As much as it is a blessing to be in this world, it is still a responsibility for parents to guard their children from depression, because per case that could be worse when it happened in here wouldn't it? While it happened

--------------

My Stupid. Truth doesn't have to mean one past, like sudoku could be cleared with multiple ways sometimes, it's about the law and order and probably not about One Past.

Ridiculous me

However... we should always act like it's One Past, given the chances, and how worth it it is to protect against lies

I changed my mind v.02

Transaction tax is not superior from VAT as far as I could understand now. 

Maybe there's benefit to implement both, with very very low transaction tax rate (in order to penalize a way of money laundering) but to replace it, I don't know

The problem with auto AI corrections v.02

When we make programs or assets with AI, if something needed to be modified, the AI still couldn't be held responsible with the consequences compared to human inventors. The problem also is that we couldn't really assess comprehensively the codes of AI, how do they get there, and how reliable the results are. If anything wrong happened, what if the AI was unable to correct "responsibly", while we as mere humans couldn't understand or comprehensively assess the weaknesses of the results, say the solutions were complex. 

How auditable are AIs?

The Morality of Asset Relevance v.05

The Printing of Money in the economy should go hand in hand with the presence of (the circuit of..) assets in the economy. If there were more assets that means more organs therefore need more blood. 

Really by asset I mean the relevance of assets not merely the existence of assets. 

However I would point that nobody should maintain the relevance of the asset. Everyone who has control over the presence of money should just pay attention to the reality of the economy and adjust accordingly, people should keep their hands off of micro managing the circuits themselves. 

I'm talking about innovation and the second law of thermodynamics, don't go against it. Things always change, we could steer the path towards more justice instead of more chaos but we couldn't make it so that it wouldn't change, and so we shouldn't act as if we could (no matter how powerful the impacts of our PR campaigns).

In fact, to me it smells like those who were under appreciated for their PR prowess started this whole gatekeeping, karen culture, to make a statement. Uuu Reality sucsk, we worth so much more... UUU. 

Okhay, so... I do anticipate in the future that the central banks are going to share their authorities in one way or the other. One manifestation of this is a mechanism where people could prevent some new assets from distruptively entered the market before everyone else were prepared enough. Remember that it's bad to force upon the relevance of an asset, if some configurations have been improved by reality, we, and our policy makers should react accordingly. 

------------------------------------

Notes:

I don't believe that the 2nd law says that everything is moving towards net chaos, instead I believe that everything keeps on changing. 

The meaning of relevance of an asset is its ability to improve Justice sustainably. If one disruptive assets were deemed to be unjust then preventing it must have been based on Truthful evidence that it is unjust (for example poisonous toys that are gaining popularity). With the same spirit a good innovation if implemented wrongly, in a manner that would hurt the whole economy, it would ruin the good purpose and the potentials of it. So that mechanism to gradually introduce the technology is good which also telling the conditions:

1. We must introduce it and ultimately expire the existing irrelevance, no getting around it. 

2. Its presence must be exposed in public so that everyone could expect the standard and the Truth of it.

For me in the future in case you read this and think this is Bullshid:

The "asset" relevance manipulation is not changing the asset from v.01 to v.02, rather kept on the v.01 but lying and commit crimes and tricks so that it's still be the go to solution while it doesn't check all the boxes anymore (because the checklists have changed and the new better ways have already been revealed).  

So the direction to go in the future is probably going to be; instead of setting up new entrepreneurships and let them die out of raw market mechanisms, the new market is going to come together and decide which solutions they were going to incorporate next and commit to (at least) its break even before moving on to the next. So it is like a more democratized central bank role where "banks" would also mean a venue where financials decisions were made collectively rather than just by an individual for an  individual, or by an individual with the bank only. 

It doesn't mean that such "banks" should have the power to decide the outcome of new entrepreneurships, its just that for those who were participating they would commit to a measure of return for an agreed upon venture before moving on to the next (or to compensate if drastic changes were desired). We shouldn't increase the barriers of entries for entrepreneurships (legal entrepreneurships)

-----------------------------------------

There's a less micro managy way of doing this, which is to make the share market accessible to all not only for big businesses but also for small businesses. However the problem is with the honesty of the management and it's hard to assure. Also people should be let to own shares with very little money, likely the shares of their own environments.

Modern Neuroticism v.04

Neuroticism's definition could be found online and better through psychology lectures by scientists. For me when I was overwhelmed by negative emotions and reacted negatively or relatively negatively I'd say that I'm being neurotic. 

However modern neuroticism is an evolution of its own. Where patients had deprived off of his/her ability to leave things on a positive note. It has to be negative in meaning at the end of everything. 

(I'm being sarcastic, I'm not a clinical psychologist)

"Wow that painting is something else"

"Yeah, the way the painter chose the colors, what seemed to be off at first actually has deeper meanings"

"Indeed Indeed"

"Also that part where he didn't anything to... Genius"

"Right, I didn't understand that now I understand why he smeared a little sh*t right on the corner there where people would hold onto it"

"That's sh*t?"

"Yeah"

"Oh wow, that's incredible"

"Indeed, I heard his full time job is actually an off-shore miner"

"I see, wow. This painting must worth millions of dollars"

"It's already at 100 million right now"

"Oh, I wish I had 200"

"Me too, he rarely brush his teeth though"

"Eeewkh, Yuck"

"Yeah..."

"That's disgusting"

"Tell me about it"

"Alright man nice talking with you"

"Same here, brother"

"Good bye...", "Bye..."

---------

"Nice weather isn't it?"

"Yeah... this time of the year, we are so priviliged to have this perfect temperature, light, and wind speed"

"You said what I'm supposed to say exactly"

"Cheers friend..."

"Maybe it has something to do with those electric cars replacing the smokey ones"

"Again, my thoughts exactly... I had converted for 10 years"

"Wow impressive, what is it Tesla?"

"Public transportation"

"Ah...."

"Yeah..."

"Bus drivers are some of the best people ever..."

"I almost got killed by one actually"

"Huh? What happened?"

"I stood on the streets"

"Ah..."

"Yeah my friend had to grab my collar and pulled me to the sidewalk"

"Right, this gets dark pretty fast"

"Yeah, seems like it's gonna rain soon"

"Alright, see you... survivor"

"See you later good listener" (ehm... mother fother)

... "(ehm... That was a mental challenge)"

Local Promotional Stand

In a complex or a block, there are local communities of businesses and in order to amplify their searchability people who are visiting or shopping around would be exposed to this Local Promotional Stand. 

Whether they are food, clothings, properties, etc in this stand they could opened up their temporary store for a week. Visitors would be informed of where they are permanently situated. They could offered up samples or maybe they don't have to. The point is such exposure is also beneficial for the visitors as they could be welcomed with something new every week.

What could be some variables of quality of property v.02

Quality of Property could also be looked at as The ability, the power to reject injustice. What could be factors:

1. Statistics of disease that had free access to the property relative to the history of properties throughout time. (this relativity would be dynamic as time goes on of course)

2. Statistics of crimes against the owner of the property

3. Statistics of hunger, substance relapses, depressions, etc

etc

However just the statistics is incomplete as various forms of injustice could sip into properties without them ever had any history against the properties, so in addition:

1. The readiness of measures against common injustice 

2. The readiness of the owner to understand and identify forms of injustice

3. Fortifications strength of the owner against depressions, substance abuse, poverty (measured relative to some pre-identified bottom and top of what's available).

Of course what relevant injustice given the context, the demography, should first be defined and its property should dynamically transforms as the time goes on. 

There are likely other dimensions of qualities of properties as well...

This measure could be used as alternative to GDP per Capita

----------------------------

Actually they are how you measure a particular configuration, but when the configuration changed the new configuration should be re-measured. So I was wrong that it applies to a property, it should be to the configuration of the property.