The Past is in the Future v.03

With progressing technology in universal positioning and A.I predictions of the future, using laws of science and the reality of the reliability of such laws. It is not far fetching to predict that the technology can be used to trace the past.

Crime Scene Investigation will be able to use the technology to trace actual events of accidents or murder like rewinding reality to the past. The program could display like a movie, an accurate occurrence of the accidents so that people can learn about the details in how wounds should be treated or whether the accidents were actually purposeful acts of crime and the unidentified people who participated in the crime.

Having this technology means that we could trace people before their time of death in the highest possible resolution, and brought them to life in the program.

I could have multiple versions of myself, they are all me, but between each other, they are different individuals. They all could be held responsible for my actions, but for the acts done after the resurrections, they should answer only with respect to themselves.

So in this life, the relevant question to ask myself is, would I love to keep on living forever? Would I look back to the choices that I've made, 1000, to 1 million years from now and laughed? or would I cry? Would the people in the future hold me responsible for the things that I've done? Would they welcome me in friendship as I mend the things that I've done? How hard should I toil before I could actually make an overall desirable connection with the people of that world?

My works, my inventions, my discoveries, would they help me? Would they help them?

Maybe I'm going to be the richest person in the world, or maybe the happiest. I'm optimistic

Anyway,

The world is fractal if you wish that you could turn back time, then just wait.

Trying to promote the Golden Sticker Idea again

My response comment:

The Patent could be used against innovation as all great tools can be used against its purpose. But the fact of the matter is, the growth of 21' st century has been driven largely by patent based inventions.

However, we must not forget what truly motivates the growth of assets, meritocracy. The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are not at our full potential because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions. 

The idea of patent secures gratitude and rewards to the sources of the solutions we use in the world. In the future, however, using the internet we could make the execution cheaper, more accurate, and more accessible using the mesh/the cloud topology. 

Set up social media, and allow everyone to produce their own stickers that could be bought and sold by other people. If I think that certain-certain inventors have helped me with my life, I would buy their stickers to give thanks. The stickers that I've bought shall appear on my profile page, they would look like (Google 2018 silver sticker, Microsoft 2019 golden sticker, Google 2019 golden sticker). And in their profile page shall appear my sticker (Melki 2018 golden sticker, Melki 2019 platinum sticker, Melki 2019 platinum sticker). It shows that a mutual transaction has occurred, I've paid them money, and they have the royalty in the solution of my life/business.

So what this will create is the value for negotiation. When you compete for tenders or jobs or other things, people would check on your profile page and see who are the people you appreciate the most. Your potential counterparts would then chose to do business with you because you seem like a profitable person who would value their intelligence and efforts or because you're the most relatable person to them.

Of course, in order to prevent the transaction abuse, every sticker transaction would be charged a small amount of transaction taxes.

This idea should serve as an add-on, not a replacement to the current, already working well IP System. But there are some intellectual products that are not covered, and there are people who just don't have the resources to secure a patent.

Greedisgood v.03

Autonomous beings emerged because of God's love for The Truth
But in the reign of the Son, the Inclination to keep on Inclining forever, His love for the Truth would be different.

No longer will the truth be relevant because of danger, but because of the variability of the ever-increasing intensity of the Inclination to keep on Inclining forever to different autonomous beings.

Let's call it Reward

Therefore, in the viably realizable Ideal world that is to come, indeed,

Greedisgood

Suggestion to Youtube for commercials and monetization

While audiences are watching videos, make available a string near the description, visible while watching, "Do you like the video? would you watch a commercial at the end for the video? would you donate for the video?"
Each question is a clickable segment,

Clicking for the like question would update the time of your like, this would enable information about the relevancy of the video for the current time, even if the video was an old video.
Clicking the commercial segment would activate a commercial at the end of the video, even if the video is just a one minute video.
Clicking the donate segment would direct the watcher to the payment page after the video.

People should be able to activate all three together.

Identification of a consensus doesn't mean a regulation should be made in respond

Negotiation is the most important thing in social life.

As long as there is another person in this world, agreement would always be a relevant target to achieve.

There is a cost to negotiation, especially in time and concentration span, but I'll get back to that issue later.

The idea of right exist because of the existence of another negotiable beings. We can empathize that all of us want everything that we want and need to belong to us. And because of that it's only normal that we are friends that share the same idea of freedom. Unfortunately our friendship still hasn't produced the adequate technology to make us unobtrusive to one another (in our true form). So we create artificial rights, basically limitation to the true right of owning everything that we want and need. For example, property rights, human rights, the right to bring matters into court, etc.

The rule of thumb is, people wanted to increase the level of availability of mutual solutions, so that it became increasingly easier and easier for people to have their freedom and to acquire what currently are and inevitably are going to be their needs and wants.

Naturally the law is the negotiation technology to accommodate all the people in the world. It's not perfect, but it's the best we got. And it's so good that even the internet could only add on into it instead of replacing it. This is due to the nature of limited resources, concentration and time allocation, which are required to complete negotiations. The law is like an organism that has been living for more than 4000 years, keep on improving, keep on evolving, keep on auditing itself.

Now, the fact that to make something canon within the rule of law, you need to negotiate with 7 billion people if not more, I personally feel that it is disrespectful for people who felt that because some acts are hurting some people's feelings, then they would have the adequate legitimation to enforce some rules upon other people. I feel that they decided that it's fine to not consider my interests to be valid, based on some non utility or uncarefully considered reasons.

For example, regulation against people screaming and shouting in the office was worth it because, people in the office would be able to help a lot more people and satisfy their needs because of it. But regulating against people crossing the street when they saw some group of people coming, because it would hurt their feelings, is just unnecessary. Wouldn't it serve the purpose better if we just suggest people to train self control and strength of mind to manage own emotions, instead of spending other people's tax money (investments), time and concentration to deal with problems that are not going to help them in their lives?

I think people need to be reminded that controlling own's emotions are highly virtuous and worth investing. People who are good with it are attractive and precious to negotiate with, I would also find it sensible that they would have easier time reaching happiness and serenity, success in life.

The main reason I write this, is so that people would always aim for self control instead of controlling other people. Control over other people is obtrusive and should only be exercised unwillingly for the sake of the level of availability of mutual solutions because there were no better options figured out

Prediction on University Marking v.03

In the future maybe universities will improve their marking system,
This is my attempt to hit the target,

1. Examination tests will give minus marks to bad answers, zero marks for no answers, and positive marks for correct answers. For stating facts from memory, as long as they were correct they would likely be appreciated, but greater marks would be acquired through good quality insights based on the accurate facts.

2. There would be various passing thresholds for each individual problems, but maximum marks would be infinite. Those that managed to pass the passing marks would be measured for the first tier pass. What I meant by the first tier is at about equal to A marks or High Distinction marks now. But there would be those who would surpass even those marks in relation to the problem.
For those that managed such achievement, they would be marked for excellence by the grader. And then their answer would be passed on to a lead professor or researcher of the university to receive an additional grading.

3. Practical grading is the additional grading made by the researcher or the lead professor. If the professor was unimpressed with the answer there would be zero additional marks, but if they found the answer to be practical, meaning it provides new insight or progress on how to solve certain problems, then they would receive a positive mark on that.
The practical marks would count as an addition to the overall test marks. Plus they would be given money, or even an intellectual property right because of the practical contribution.

The student might score some negative marks while also acquired a positive practical grading. In this case, even though he/she didn't pass the subject, his/her endeavor would most likely be appreciated by him/herself and the university.

After the results were announced, students who were unsatisfied with their grades or even curious about something could pay extra to a discussion with their grader. Students that managed to score an excellent mark in relation to a problem would be given a free discussion session. 

The Logos, The Inspiration

Why Jesus is the Logos, and not the Letter?

Words are made from letters and relationships (between letters).

The Logos is about objects and the relationships between them.

As Jesus is humble and lovely, truthful and illuminating. As a Christian I aspire to set Love, Truth, Respect, Wisdom and Intelligence to be prioritized in reality.

There are so many things to be prioritized at once, but realistically they are one in the Logos, and they could be prioritized altogether.