Humility

Wisdom really separates between a robot and a sentient being. 

Having all the knowledge and the processing procedure with all the speed, still a myriad of times slower than wisdom. 

Absolute wisdom? Nah, but the pursuit of it

Excitement

Love

Fortresses v.04

There are ways that our ancestors and us survived throughout time:

1. Defecating

2. Copulating

3. Lying

4. etc (but I wanted to talk around those three now)

So we couldn't help but to do all those three. If only we could be free from those, but we needed them. 

Therefore in order to fortify our sterileness we have the toilet, our sovereignity of our privacy and mental properties we have spouses, but in terms of the usefulness of information? 

We are blessed with PvP, Sparring, and Humor

The frame of it all is accountability, all parties could acknowledge, measure, comprehended to a fair extent what each other was doing at the end of the day. 

Exploration of vulnerabilities, but as vaccines instead of diseases. We should keep it that way

---------------------------

>Weapons... weapons are different

>PvE is PvP vs the developer and/or the A.I, and/or the archetypes

>If private masturbation is enough then it should be enough (I'm not sure), but lots of people need another person to be enough it seems.

I understood better my taste in jokes v.02

I like jokes that if you asked about them later to be explained, the utterers/the comics wouldn't put themselves in bad positions explaining them clearly (of course there were nuances but that's the rule of thumb). 

It's like good jokes vs innuendos, they are subtle but one was explainable nicely out in the open the other you face retaliation jeopardizing your freedom in public out of being accused of as a mental hospital patient material (because you tried to asked people what they were really saying). 

---------------------

Things that avoid accountability avoids it for a reason

The Self and the Investment v.05

Whim doesn't define a person, an exercised whim might be a person's responsibility, but still doesn't define a personality. 

I'm not a psychologist but I concur to the idea that people's personalities are complex and unique. Unfortunately somehow the society believe that a person could be defined by their whim and that is the real person. Why?

There's the third person, the auditor, the consciousness, what about those sides of a personality how about them? So if you think you are your whim, then let there be that way. I define myself as I am officially, as what I clearly said, as what I clearly declare, other than that are unofficial and most often the incomplete me. 

That incomplete me might be mean, might be evil, might dictate what I wanted to do, but in the end what I did mostly not dictated by that side of me. Please human beings have the decency of bringing this brain capability to the table, please. 

Stop making assumptions about people's personalities based on some shallow aggregations, you yourself are too big for that, so don't put other people inside that small compartment. People have different ways of acting and discerning, a threatening monstrous capability and inclinations shouldn't define the entirety of a person. A soft person could have stolen from, robbed, and killed multiple people, that is more reliable of a sign (statistics) but even that might not be complete. 

The context upon what I'm saying is, I dislike how people could be punished by other people for their words' innuendos. Should I describe more? A tendency of a person to be hurtful is a part of a personality, but the personality it is not. Someone with a knife might be a robber, but might also be a chef, if you got rid of knives from everybody, then chefs wouldn't be able to cut with a knife.

Invest your identity in you that are clear, otherwise you that are clear is a lie.

------------------------------

If I were to create a company, it would be cool and hip to name it The Truth is the Protocol or TTITP or TTTP in the share market. But in case of somebody has taken the initial, I'm going to have to settle with TTIT, T_T

---------------------------------------

Group vs Individuals

It is really hard to make a complicated group. Individuals lived with themselves for the rest of their lives, their traits and fragments of their consciousness were fond with each other and they grew together. Groups that could equal that is too rare to make a consideration. You lived with each other for how long? Do you even like one another and willing to grow together? 24x7?

So if you identify yourself as a group, then that group's characteristics, that aggregation, that simple easy to blend commonalities are going to be huge part of your individual. Don't, well that might be true, like your real hair would be black if you're an asian or your body weak if you're a woman, but don't let your personality revolves around it, around the blackness of the hair, and the weakness of the body, cause there's so much more to you. Made this mistake and along the way people couldn't but to deny their exposures (had to lie), because they would be too vulnerable... their mistake.

(be a member of a group only for a necessity or a context, after that be a distinct individuals even in front of the "enemy". Never miniscule our membership as living beings, and as human beings, as creatures of mass, as biological organisms... so many groups we're missing out to be a part of just for the sake of being a member of an exclusive constraint).

----------------------------------------

Being part of a group is lovely, being part of a million and trillion groups are million and trillion times the loveliness, being part of millions and trillions and more of advanced groups are (...) times the loveliness, and I want that. It is so underwhelming being limited to just one or two unsynergized fake shallow group or groups. 

No one don't want that, after all, but the protocol is the Truth, who then wants to acknowledge that?

The Reciprocal Sticker System (renewed idea from the Golden Sticker)

The reciprocal sticker is my imaginary system addressing this problem:

Sometimes creators/authors created the kinds of solutions that are just not worth going through the official intellectual property protection procedures, or they were just too reluctant to go through the process.

Therefore, in the mean time, why not social media companies do this:

Allow Creators, Authors, Content Creators to put their mark ("sticker") in people's profile page for a tiny cost.

Everytime a person contributes goods and services or money to the authors, the authors could opt to leave their sticker as a sign that the person has been a reciprocal person. 

The benefit of having these stickers in your profile page is, that they could be signs for other creators that it is a good idea to give you easier access to their own goods and services (because you are a reciprocal person). 

For the creators especially the small ones it is an extra way to get income from day to day people, instead of having to wait for a break from a big corporation.

While we, when we check on other people's profile page, we could tell what are the things that our network appreciates and what better ways we could contribute to it. 

Don't miss this! v.04

Just because you got what you deserve and others haven't, doesn't mean that you don't deserve it.

Maybe you got only a fraction of what you deserve and others got the less fraction of theirs, doesn't mean that you don't deserve it all. 

Just because someone didn't get as much as he deserved less than everybody else, doesn't mean that it's not evil already

Adulthood v.05

In my opinion, the public should recognize adulthood as:

1. One who pledged to always prioritize justice in his/her conducts or interactions

2. Could be held responsible. Could be reasoned with. Meaning that the person has the ability to understand what rules are, and when someone was not being fair/just.

So an adult is someone who has a good sense of justice always (since we are not perfect yet, we settle for common relativity for the sense of justice)

------------------------------------

Some people won't prioritize this, so they should not be allowed in public interactions.

However inadequacy doesn't constitute unwillingness. So I felt it's fair to have people define their own parameters based on their own definitions of justice and reject people out of their collective properties. As long as their standards were not against the law or Justice itself.

my definition of Justice: Justice is when everyone gets whatever they wanted and needed whenever they wanted or needed them.

Since we are not there yet, the Truthful progress towards there is our current Justice. (and since the Truth is Truthfully everything, all Truthful point of views are respectfully Truthful, not just the point of views of the authorities).

But simply put: You can't be an adult if you won't prioritize justice.

------------------------------------

Being an adult one would have this consideration: How am I supposed to know what is Truly good? I might need all the knowledge in the world, all the point of views that there is. 

Indeed I agree, and that's what I call absolute Justice. 

How do we judge whether a person is being decent or not, having a good sense of Justice or not? How do we say how much compensation one must make in order to be responsible? Who could possibly know what's really Just everytime? 

Is it in the law?, in the intuition?, it's in the popular consensus, it's in the guidelines of the experts and the leaders, it's in the beauty of it!, no, it's in logic and common sense, it's in your heart, it's hidden where it couldn't be known, no it is not, it's nowhere...

It's so tiring, why not just settle with what is peaceful, that's it, who cares about Justice... (let the extortionists won, power rules).

But then, when are we ever going to move on?

It's in where it is, and it's there...

When you're an adult you try, because you always tried, you knew how hard it is... 

and you keep on trying

----------------------------------

In the end, it comes down to personal property. Minding your own business, defending your grounds... even when that is not fair / unjust, at least the alternatives are definitely not "Just" from your point of view. 

Your point of view is your Truth, the God in you, what else are you supposed to rely on?

---------------------------------

If your truth is a lie, how could it be compatible sustainably? And if your facts are True but your wisdom is wrong, wouldn't it still be a lie? 

Justice is impossible? then what do you call people getting what they wanted and needed? Justice manifests all the time to a lot of people... 

The problem lies in when it didn't happen, and even that is not a good enough reason to stop being an adult. That is the reason to be an adult.

Why don't you try to buy for the Truth and Wisdom? with your time, with your mind, with your assets? What is shown in public, how hopeless things are... yet they didn't change the fact of advancements in technology and civilization, philosophy and morality, relationships. 

Why won't anyone be an adult?

-----------------------------

Now it comes down to my subjective suggestion, if you want your selfishness be Truthfully Just then give thanks. The more you give thanks to your sources of solutions the more you become a part of the circuit of mutual solutions, the preservation of it. 

Whether your mind would be vested interested in it, whether your position in the civilization of the society, whether your quantum presence... supposedly. 

Think about it, right? Why wouldn't it be?