Disclaimer and Privacy Policy

Monday, September 28, 2020

Everything that is good v.05

This is what Paul said, 

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.

(https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/phl/4/8/s_1107008)

And the famous: 

And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

(https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/1co/13/1/s_1075001)

Charity is actually AGAPE, Love

    - affection, good will, love, benevolence, brotherly love

    - love feasts

(https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/Lexicon/Lexicon.cfm?strongs=G26&t=KJV, outline of biblical usage, September 2020)

So it is well known among Christians, all this bleak ass prophecy in the bible, about how the antichrist is going to kill all the good people on earth (maybe it means on land). But we Christians tend to always do this: In order to preserve our "doctrine" we sacrificed the truth or the pursuit of the realization of an actual better life. 

Lets not do this. Just because we have to anticipate for the worst, doesn't mean we couldn't hope for the best. 

If we could avoid all of the bad things from happening, which I don't see any reason why we wouldn't be able to, then let us go for it.

My attempt to make up a poetry and interpret it myself v.06

I think the death and resurrection and the ascension and the promise to return of Jesus Christ is a poetry:

What is Justice:
I say Justice is when everybody gets what they needed and wanted. No one asked to be born in this world so it is only fair that we all like it. 

What is Evil:
Evil is the potential for misallocation of resources. It is the opposite of Justice.

Why Evil?
Scarcity is the result of Evil, according to my interpretation of the bible. The Garden of Eden is a place of abundance, and after humanity sinned, scarcity arose.  

Humans ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. 

We became able to understand what is not fair, what would be problematic in the future, what would be painful for us and so for other people/creatures, how to increase the scarcity of some resources for others, how to rank people politically - who deserves less, and who deserves more. Nakedness is vulnerability to be judged and be lowered in rank by others. 

Upon our understanding, came our liability to side with evil. If we could identify that we made something bad, or mistakes, we have the temptation to doubled down on our mistakes. 

Lets say I stole my sister's peanut, I'm busy so I don't want to deal with her objections... So I lied and I said I don't know who ate your peanut. Now there's an inertia here, say she asked further about where I was or why I smell like peanut or else, its the classic escalation of lies scenario. 

Even if I got away with it, I would have the inclination to repeat it in the future because of the dopamine. 

Lets say later the older I am, the more I have sinned, and now I have stolen many different stuffs and got away with it. The people who found out about my sin I found out about theirs too and we "protected" each other. This is more serious than you think, because now our group will have a system that would preserve many different kinds of "sins" altogether. And the longer this system is on, the more we are proficient in running it. 

But of course this system is not compatible with justice, and all it would do, all it would escalate is the resistance to fairness. So we know what lack of fairness would brought out to our environment... scarcity. The longer this system were preserved, the worse and worse the force against abundance would be. 

So that's the fall of humanity, dragging down together with them, the abundance of their world. 


The Sneak of God:

In order to restore justice, humans have to judge. They have to purge sins among themselves. 

What the Judgement against Jesus event is trying to say is:

Jesus is sinless, and those that were against Him were against Him because of Sin. Because Jesus' purity would just always going to be a problem for their position. 

That means, sins cloud judgements. And since all humans except Jesus are sinful, they no longer have the ability to achieve true Justice. Only Jesus could. Other than Jesus, all are vested interested, even within their subconscious, to not be truly Just. We all are insane in the membrane

Now where is Jesus? He is alive and is about to return... but He is not here yet. 

So now what do we do?

The answer is: well we should do our best, but, keep in mind what we did to Jesus. 

In other words, without Jesus as the ultimate Judge, there is no hope for true Justice among ourselves.
(Edit v.06: Maybe it could be interpreted as the standard could be found in Christianity, but to execute the proper Judgement Procedure you actually need Jesus Christ Himself).

But since Jesus is alive and is about to return, we have to keep at it and do our best. But it is unjust for a person to always be "unworthy" based on our judgement. It is unjust to expect a person to always judge accurately... because it is impossible. It is wise to anticipate for bad judgements, It is wise to check up for your mental health (because evil tend to escalate), It is wise to audit and to give the benefit of the doubt. It is wise to forgive.

People might be guilty but we should not strip people off of the presumption of innocence. You could assume someone to be guilty or not guilty simultaneously, you could assume someone to be not guilty, but to assume only guilty is not wise... (actually being not guilty only should also mean not wise, but that's like butterfly effect level of truth, so, relatively speaking, I don't know actually). 

---------------------------------------------------

So the second coming of Jesus means, the ultimate enlightenment. 

The form of that, for me as a Christian is the literal second coming of Christ. 

But... (Oh my God)... 

But... It has been proven time and time again, to not do anything because of just "believing in the Bible" is a form of arrogance (of the interpretation of the Bible). And God hates arrogance.

(Edit v.06:

The Literal Second Coming of Christ is not a hopeless remark. If humanity managed to accurately measure accurate positioning and allocation of resources, accurate fair transactions among beings, the execution could be a problem still. I think this is where a perfect being would fit in. 

A Judge whose mind is free from noises and whose consciousness is flawless, should be needed to pull off the last blow, the end of evil.) 

Lastly a shameless plug of my motto: 

The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions. Solutions are unlimited but we are so limited because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions. 

Giving thanks in a form of goods and services or money, is a good way to counter evil, especially if done properly. We need the second coming of Christ to do that perfectly, so, just keep trying until you get it (relatively) right. 

Saturday, September 26, 2020

Sacrilegious v.08

Now I shouldn't be talking about this if it weren't a trend challenging proposition. 

And I will talk about this only under the premise to challenge a trend, my personal feelings in regards to my personal relationships should not be conveyed.

Some people made remarks to hurt other people using the innuendo of the meaning of their words. But there are other types of expression that is being bullied as a spirit, that is spontaneity. 

Some people create works of art or stories based on what is interesting in their mind and feelings at the time. Turned out some of those elements may have came from watching the sufferings of their friend or other people. Now does that mean that he disregarded the feelings of the friend upon the publication of the work? Yes, if his friend definitely worries about innuendoes all the time or maybe in another case was in a neurotic state of mind. Yes he disregarded it but does it mean that he meant all the mean things that might be derived from it in all various of ways? NO. 

And this is the problem with the world that is drunk with over-glorification of innuendos. They regulate speech, using madness. When I do something, and concentrated in it, and found it to be compelling, I wouldn't be focusing on other things... I wouldn't always be mean even when I'm a mean person in nature. And that's why what is official is what is official, consciousness regulated the manifestation of your feelings, innuendoes don't represent the position a person take over another and should not be deemed as such. 

Of-course in relation of things that are truly traumatic at a time, disregard to someone's feelings could mean crossing the line. But crossing the line in terms of what? Ignorance? or Maliciousness? We have to use our intelligence (actually, we have to clearly converse with the person). 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now this got me made a meaning out of the "Satan tempting David to count the numbers" event depicted in the bible. There's a point of view that said that God was in it with the temptation and a point of view that it was Satan. Both are legit in the bible. But what I want to talk about is the Satan part. 

Refer to the Romance of The Three Kingdoms, Imagine Liu Bei called Sima Yi to asked about Zhuge Liang's infantry formations... Zhuge Liang would be like: "But that's the enemy my Lord"

So, the Israelites when they go to war, numbers have always been something that they play around with. It is not the utmost priority. In history, Gideon also was shown that God doesn't worry about numbers. And in my opinion, it is the Israelites' army's style to exploit the enemy's reliance on numbers to win against them. 

So when David counted, he was acting to use the numbers as an indicator of winning chances... which means incorporating the enemy's weakness into their morale. It is incompatible. 

And I wouldn't want to do that. 

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Words like Math Symbols v.04

I get it now, I get it now why I always feel like I'm a relatable person, not much different than others (but people seem to think that I'm weird). 

Even my friends, I'm sure they knew that my processing power in terms of common stuffs are... allright. 

But I could keep up with things such as thoughts, poetry, songs, in ways that other people would find to be kind of impressive sometimes. It is because the lightness of the words that is in my mind. 

These words are not tied to meanings such as innuendos like in the minds of other people. 

These words are light, and meanings stable and assured and consistent. I could play with them like a math equation pretty easily. Because their meanings have little interference if it were to be moved around in the realm of suppositions. 

I'm sure I'm a Genius, but my field has not yet been found (by me). If you think I'm kind of impressive with words... you could try my style, you would be surprised how easy it actually is. 

I recently found that I could do Innuendos too in the level of people who are used to it could. But since this is how my life has come to, I don't think that lifestyle is good for me. Please don't be offended if there were words that I should've known to be sensitive... I just don't and I don't want to get used to it. I even want to train myself to lose those nexus in order to improve myself. 

Have fun

------------------------------------------------

Actually, I think again about this, and this came up:

Positive things drag negative things slow, negative things drag Positive things down. So if you are proficient with something, including innuendos I'm not trashing you (the negative innuendos were the things that were so annoying and such a dead weight)

If you're a psychopath and you're proficient in negative things, and your age is high. Maybe I could offer you this consideration:

Positive things will keep on bearing fruit, while negative things eventually will be done away with. 

Maybe during your hard positive journey you could stumble upon something great, when I stumbled upon the point of view of inclinations and the problem with piracy, my life went upside down... I threw a lot of things away, and most things that I developed after, are pleasant to me until now. Maybe you'll stumble upon something even greater who knows. Its going to be heavy but... Its going to be worth it I say.

Tuesday, September 22, 2020

When the words you say won't mean what it means anymore v.03

So here you are a high IQ big brain all knowing all quick witted the beast master of the world of innuendos. You are so good you are too classy to just have 1 meaning in your words ever, it would always mean 10 or 20 other compact and fractal meanings that would make everyone around you bow down in the destruction of their unworthy self esteem. 

Now, unfortunately because of that... everything you said even everything you didn't had been used against you. And you, cornered, had nowhere to go but to destroy your own ego. 

But, no... you doubled down... banding up with people who had nothing to do with your life you became the most feared warlordnnuendos of your neighborhood.

Now, no one dare to say anything when you are around, cause of Miranda. Miranda the most powerful Goddess of all is on your side. (Except at the court of law but that's the only place your neighborhood is not).

Now, what's life, what's the meaning of their words, their "comforting" words, their "ass licking", what's the meaning of your words, even you are not sure what anymore. You know, you let the people with the most pleasant idea decide what it means. Yeah Yeah Yeah, that's what it actually means. 

And so that's who you are, powerful, meaningful, an AVATAR of your group. But who are you? as an Individual who are you? Who are you?

--------------------------------------------------------------

An Inspiration to this post, the words don't represent. But some feelings it gives me I used it. 



Sunday, September 20, 2020

Suggestion when dealing with the "Field" of Innuendo's or Hints or "Official Avoidance" Discussions v.03

1. Do it for fun

2. There is no contract/agreement in it, is there a hypothetical husband... or hypothetical wife? If there were, was it an actual marriage?

3. Don't be so quick to get offended. When things get serious, seek verification first. This world is not clear, so no one should be obliged to be tied to their "supposed" hints. No one including the bullies. Many times it is going to be misunderstandings anyway. So back to no.1

4. Don't fight in it. You'll ruin it for everybody. 

5. Everyone can choose to participate or not to participate. You'd know a toxic community when they use innuendos for everything that is important. This is a sign for trying to avoid being clear most of the time. So already this is a red flag. No matter what, written law wants to be your friend. It is there, it is public domain, it is always available for everyone. People who always want to avoid that realm are trying to not be about it. 

Again no. 3, realize that some people made unintentional "hints" when concentrating on other things. When they are in an argument, they would be concentrating on the issue at hand, and during serious times in the world of clearness, we better disregard all innuendos. 

----------------------------------------------------------------

Another thing, if you abuse this type of talking, you potentially will ruin your relationship in the future no matter how good you are doing currently. For example when you are in the same company with your friend, he/she could annoy you in a way that no one else would be able to counter balance or control. So you are giving power to whoever, to get into your inner circle anytime. Avoid doing this if you can at all times. 

Unfortunately now, we don't have means yet to stop people from doing this in public. I think we should, for the sake of the serenity of the people's mind, which at current times is sensitive in aggregate. And what is dire about this situation is, the quick way to restore alliance is to find enemies. So for the sake of peace in their world of unofficialness they would have a stronger tendency to gang up against a common enemy. 


Thursday, September 17, 2020

Stockholm Syndrome Pelaku Budaya v.04

Orang jahat kode kode untuk membuli orang... Semua orang musti belajar kode kode jangan sampai tidak sengaja membuat kode seperti orang jahat itu (peduli amat itu menghina bahasa dan keadilan)

Orang jahat cuma mau bersikap baik dihadapan intimidasi... Semua orang harus belajar bergaya tampang depresif dan penuh stres, biar cater to the pain sama orang2 jahat

Orang jahat suka belok kiri walaupun melanggar lampu merah... Semua orang musti kasi tanda dari jauh jauh kalau mau lurus di sebelah kiri. 

Orang jahat ambil jalur motor di sebelah kiri... Semua orang yang di jalur mobil kiri musti weser, pip pip, dan siap dicaci dimaki dari belakang kalau mau belok kiri karena dianggap berhenti di jalur kanan di depan lampu merah. 


Sekarang, kita merasa diri kita sangar dan punya taring, karena hidup di tempat kita susah. Tapi jujur lebih kayak kita membiarkan budaya kita didikte sama orang-orang jahat

------------------------------------------------------

Sekarang coba kita ingat ingat sejarah kemanusiaan. Model begini cuma meminta darah manusia, bukannya kita jijik tapi kita tanam pelihara dan sirami. 

Baal dan Quatzequatel begitu rampantnya (mewabahnya) di populasi orang, sampai sampai One True God harus pamer bahwa dia juga bisa seperti monster, dengan meminta darah Ishak atau Ismael dari Abraham, cuma bedanya dia tidak. Karena One True God maha pinter, Dia bisa mencapai keinginannya tanpa perlu darah anak anak kalau Dia mau, gak seperti Baal dan Quatzequatel yang otaknya nda sampai kesana. 

Apa hubungannya?

Manalah orang orang jaman dulu gak sadar bahwa Baal/Quatzequatel itu khayalan belaka? Cuma saking nggak ada hujannya mereka butuh outlet curhat... saya sudah nda perduli lagi akan segala-galanya, yang penting hujan... jadilah dewa kesuburan atau dewa hujan macam peminta darah anak-anak dan manusia seperti itu. 

Para pendukung Hitler, manalah dalam hatinya tidak tahu bahwa kebijakan-kebijakan Hitler itu malicious dan melawan kemanusiaan. Tapi butuh outlet curhat... 

Yang kayak begitu sudah kita belajar dari sejarah, cuma meminta darah... 

Hargai Psikolog dan Psikiater, curhat memang penting, makanya berharga. 

--------------------------------------------------------

Mungkin anda akan bingung mau kasih seseorang hadiah apa untuk hari peringatan sesuatu... coba andaikan kamu hadiahi dia konsultasi dengan psikolog/psikiater... kalau menurutnya hal itu adalah penghinaan, berarti hadiahmu itu tepat sekali dan sesuatu yang dia butuhkan. 
Love is not spoiling, Love is caring. 

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

The devastation of Inequality

In an unequal society, it is harder to be significant. Your best attempts often minusculed by the achievements of the ultra-industrious and the hyper intellectuals. 

Hard to be meaningful, hard to find purpose, hard to be someone. 

But the answer to this is actually: Give Thanks

Who cares about the giants, they are forces of nature... just kidding. But the real giants of your life is the contributors of your life. And if you could do something for them, solve some of their problems. You don't have to be the biggest, or the most unique, or the scariest even. You've achieved meaningfulness and you are a legend.

https://youtu.be/CtWirGxV7Q8, Sept 2020


....

LEGEND

Dreams and Gaming v.05

I watched a Big Think video where Prof Michio Kaku talked about dreams. From that video I concluded that our auditing system were shut off during dreams. 

Here's the video, Accessed September 2020:


https://youtu.be/h7eYt4ZmkR8


Dream is the time we explore our mind without accuracy. We'd just explore and we would be wrong, as well as we would be right. It is an experience of a super reality that pushes the boundaries of our suppositions. 

The results of this exploration are feelings. The feelings we get from dreams can contribute to real life especially when it started to fall into the likeness of the dreams. 

So when we felt certain things about reality, jolts of anxiety, excitements, or some kind of familiar feelings, we would instigate extra considerations into the situation. Were there actually hidden opportunities? or a hidden danger? What kind of feelings I could potentially experience having this feeling about the current situation? 

So dreams could contribute to our concerns.

There are psychologists disciplined in the interpretation of dreams, dreams could represent certain inarticulated propositions about your reality. 

Upon dreaming, I encountered characters that have been living in my mind. These characters were those who were there as representations of my biological segments, and those who were there as representations of real life people and things.

Dreams are real

So since the byproducts of dreams are feelings, these new feelings could create new nexus between already existing nexus of the mind. Making it easier for me to relate to the features of reality. 

----------------------------------

Gaming on the other hand is similar and the opposite altogether. Gaming could help us build habits. The artificial habits are so compact they could enhance our chances to go further and deeper into reality, unlocking newer experiences in the given amount of time. 

Dreams help us notice things and Games help us pick and choose what to ignore.

The poetry of it is,
experiences of the subconscious enhances awareness,
experiences of consciousness brought it to the realm of unawareness. 

----------------------------------

The interplay between them seemed to serve a purpose, that is to experience new contexts out of life. Contexts reinforces our memory and our memory is our life. 

Newness is like a brain nutrition. 

Aerodynamic Economy V - v.03

So a form of this has actually manifested in reality... it is the system of law. 

First we have the declaration of independence, and then the basic constitutions, the constitutions and then the bills, and so on. Supported by culture, ethics, contracts/negotiations, discussions or communications, art-forms, etc. 

----------------------------------------------------------

Actually after I think about it, this is it... this is the answer to the whole aerodynamic thing I was thinking about. This is the best manifestation of it. And I'm glad that I have acquired another point of view why this makes sense. Thank you God :)

Aerodynamic Economy IV, the audit

 [Mat 7:16 KJV] 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

Now a solid form means there are barrier to transformations for the system and the members of the system. And somehow there is a reason why, audit is not conducted all day everyday. Not only audit is an expensive venture, well actually audit is an expensive venture is the reason, but audit can be expensive in many different ways. 

In terms of time, energy (psychological and physical), formation wise or readiness, money, expertise, opportunities, reputational stakes, etc. 

But the Truth is the utmost priority of everything, and lies are dangerous. So we have to audit. 

The Matthew 7:16 standard is my favorite. If we want to know whether or not our front-liners  still moving towards the total supremacy of the Inclination to keep on Inclining Forever, forever all the way forward... and not going the other way, we should measure their level of depression using that standard. Of the results they've produced, do they spark joy still, or not? Are their Inclinations include those that would want to stop everything (everything as in existence)? Are their inclinations include those that would want to kill themselves. 

Self training might involve muscle harming, and working might involve inflicting strains upon themselves. I think that is healthy, so again I'm not really clear of the completeness of this idea but for sure I'm all for the Truth. And that is the upmost priority for sure. 

You could be delusional and happy, but things like it would brought about certain destruction, purposeless destruction. So suffering is good, if it is for a purpose, and being inspired means enjoying purposeful disintegration.  

Aerodynamic Economy III v.02

I was wrong about the Child and the Responsibility and the Producer of Dreams.

I associated responsibility with negative emotions. I should stop doing that.

The Child is the one that is so wise and smart, they are able to sustain themselves only with positive emotions truthfully.

The criteria is not about producing dreams, it is about living the dream. And the way they are doing this should not be restricted to the amount of profit they could amass. But it lies in how they use it

Aerodynamic Economy II

 So if these solids were companies, then the one at the front is the producer of dreams. The company should be the least ruled by negative emotions. 

Now, in order to arrange the companies as a ship, you don't force them to be unhappy or happy. It is not about the same identity, it is about the same position. So in a dimension it is aerodynamic, but in another dimension it is organic. 

What I mean by that is, our body replaces its substance constantly. So the body as an identity is about the formation, not about the particular members. 

But don't get me wrong, I don't want to replace the law or morality, again I'm all about add-on not revolution. 

So Individualism is the best, it is not about dismissing the individuals, but it is about ranking up the individuals based on their depression level (inversely). 

So when one's depressed, he should work for the back end companies, once he/she had achieved serenity and positivism, he/she should be pushed forward. 

The middle part of the vessel is where the most companies are, most of us are not the most depressed nor are we the most inspired. But if we managed to figure out how to sustain the inspiration, we should be compared with other inspiring companies and be placed in accordance with our ability to sustain our good spirits. 

Now what does it mean about being at the front, and being at the back? Is it about the allocation of resources? 

The thing is it is complex, and my comprehension is incomplete. But kind of... being at the front means determining the protocols of the solid. Or if you understand the word Kiblat in Bahasa Indonesia, (Kiblat is like the direction of the Ka'bah), companies would construct their solutions in priority of the sake of the front. So their solutions could be competitive, but they should not obstruct the solutions made by the ones at the front. 

Aerodynamic Economy v.02

Gas state > Particles without connections. They could move towards the same direction and produce force but they are not bound to one another

Liquid state > Particles with multiple ways of relating to one another, and the more they are dynamic the less the viscosity, the less they are changing the way the connect with each other the more they are gooey. 

Solid State > Particles with singular way of connecting to each other, most of the time, and most of the time they are in the state of connection with each other. 

If I suppose evil being forces of friction for the progress of the economy... we might find aerodynamic state useful. But disclaimer beforehand I don't feel like saying this because it could contrast my ego. 

To be aerodynamic you have to be solid. 

Maybe only the outer part the inside might not necessarily entirely solid... right? (oh I'm so annoyed with this thought)  

And you have to be like a pyramid, or pointy. 

But this pyramid is not like a tomb, it is like a ship, so the front is the area who is supposed to be at the most near to the ultimate goal. Be it a child, with the least amount of responsibilities... and as the vessel diverged, the child would be supported by more and more responsibilities. And for sure the mid part would be where the most people are, and the back side would be the people with the highest level of depression. 

With this formation, we might experience the least amount of evil relative to before. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The front means the leader, while the back means being led. 

In a pyramid the top means domination, it is not that. Being at the front means, exuding happiness for everybody else. Firstly the 3 people behind him/her, and then the people behind them, then the people behind them, step by step. 

The fuel is giving thanks, 

Now why is it that the people at the back can't move forward though I don't know, that's why I don't like this. Really it bothers me... so I'm on it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's an inspiration behind this post 



Tuesday, September 15, 2020

The Demons of your comfort zone

 In recent times, I have go about doing things that tire myself significantly. Something that other people wouldn't even acknowledge. And what I got from it is silly actually, 

Don't bite more than you can chew. 

The world is fractal, your comfort zone is where you could sense the segments of the fractal and audit it, triangulate it at least. And in here, here is where you kill the demons. Because evil is fractal as well, destroying bad things at your zone meaning dealing damage for the whole thing in all fractals. 

The stupidest thing we could do is to go out of our comfort zone, and expected that we would do well for sure. What would likely happen are, wasted opportunities to deal more damage to bad things of our part.  

Don't get me wrong, going out of your comfort zone is important and it is wonderful, I encourage everybody to do so. But when you do, don't forget this:

Your understanding is better than before? Maybe, (plausible if you're sure about it). You've understood it? No. 

        DON'T FORGET THIS!

---------------------------------------------------------------

Then there's the issue of ever changing environment/reality. Naturally if you're not actively make connections with what is relevant, then your supposed comfort zone would slip away. So again, please explore out of your comfort zone, and enjoy the experience. But have discernment about your skills and wisdom. 

In the story of Adam and Eve, when humans eat the fruit of good and evil, they acquired the ability to judge good and evil, to just justice, but with this came all kinds of misfortunes and hardships. Judging is very expensive, don't throw your pearls to swines. Pick your battles 

Saturday, September 12, 2020

Why Privacy Policy is huge v.05

Big sites gather our data and they could use our information to influence behaviors of a demographic. For example making some information less available in search for people who are critical to the government in order to reduce their tendencies to be critical. 

I think people could ask for sites to provide reports of their data aggregations as corporate social responsibility or like financial statements, because that's our data too

To demonstrate my point, let us check out netflix' privacy policy... Check out the part "Matched Identifier Communications", in there we could see that not only companies gather visitors' information, they also made sense of them combined with our data from other sites. I mean there are some limitations to what extent they could do this, but still it means that if someone in the company intended to break the law, the consequences are potentially personally harmful for us. 

Check out Netflix' terms and conditions no.7

I quote partially: "Further, where permitted under the applicable law, unless both you and Netflix agree otherwise, the court may not consolidate...

I don't like the way they say the court may not consolidate... what if the court wanted to? They said where permitted under the applicable law, but "the court MAY NOT..." now this is an oxymoron for one, and next you and me don't get to say the court may or may not anything. This come across to me as arrogance. 

This kind of attitude I find to be concerning, as it could be a sign of people not taking the court at the utmost priority it demanded to be prioritized. That is my personal opinion. And, based on that subjective opinion I'm uneasy on their integrity, treating my data with respect, justice/fairness. 

But things like this are inevitable, because they could use the data at their own secrecy without our watching. And there's very little we could do about that. So I propose for the reveal of information. 

We ought to be able to ask for certain results of our data aggregation. I think it is fair. All of us as stakeholders are able to up the stakes and request for our data collectively and how they made sense of it. We should ask, whether or not they wanted to provide it to us (the results) is their right. But all of our data are ours too. 

-------------------------------------------------

Imagine these scenarios:

Husband suddenly got offered private detectives and divorce lawyers advertisements in their social media. Apparently the A.I of the social media identified that the wife has had an affair. 

A group of privacy enthusiasts requested for their watching patterns from youtube. They figured out that within their demographic apparently kids channels are popular in the afternoon, and gaming channel is popular in the night. They found out that they prefer sports watches rather than james bond watches, and the most beautiful type of women for them is actually women with long necks. 

Wouldn't that be interesting outcomes to consider?

-------------------------------------------------

I'd like you guys to consider this video:

https://youtu.be/iFKYu4GYqM4


In this video, Mr. Leonard French a youtuber that makes law contents, talks about data leaks within Uber and how they deal with the situation. 

When reputation was measured in more rich manners

Reputation has a spectrum, it could come from achievements, popular presentation of one's self, being audited or scrutinized, being on a...