Sacrilegious v.08

Now I shouldn't be talking about this if it weren't a trend challenging proposition. 

And I will talk about this only under the premise to challenge a trend, my personal feelings in regards to my personal relationships should not be conveyed.

Some people made remarks to hurt other people using the innuendo of the meaning of their words. But there are other types of expression that is being bullied as a spirit, that is spontaneity. 

Some people create works of art or stories based on what is interesting in their mind and feelings at the time. Turned out some of those elements may have came from watching the sufferings of their friend or other people. Now does that mean that he disregarded the feelings of the friend upon the publication of the work? Yes, if his friend definitely worries about innuendoes all the time or maybe in another case was in a neurotic state of mind. Yes he disregarded it but does it mean that he meant all the mean things that might be derived from it in all various of ways? NO. 

And this is the problem with the world that is drunk with over-glorification of innuendos. They regulate speech, using madness. When I do something, and concentrated in it, and found it to be compelling, I wouldn't be focusing on other things... I wouldn't always be mean even when I'm a mean person in nature. And that's why what is official is what is official, consciousness regulated the manifestation of your feelings, innuendoes don't represent the position a person take over another and should not be deemed as such. 

Of-course in relation of things that are truly traumatic at a time, disregard to someone's feelings could mean crossing the line. But crossing the line in terms of what? Ignorance? or Maliciousness? We have to use our intelligence (actually, we have to clearly converse with the person). 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now this got me made a meaning out of the "Satan tempting David to count the numbers" event depicted in the bible. There's a point of view that said that God was in it with the temptation and a point of view that it was Satan. Both are legit in the bible. But what I want to talk about is the Satan part. 

Refer to the Romance of The Three Kingdoms, Imagine Liu Bei called Sima Yi to asked about Zhuge Liang's infantry formations... Zhuge Liang would be like: "But that's the enemy my Lord"

So, the Israelites when they go to war, numbers have always been something that they play around with. It is not the utmost priority. In history, Gideon also was shown that God doesn't worry about numbers. And in my opinion, it is the Israelites' army's style to exploit the enemy's reliance on numbers to win against them. 

So when David counted, he was acting to use the numbers as an indicator of winning chances... which means incorporating the enemy's weakness into their morale. It is incompatible. 

And I wouldn't want to do that.