My thoughts today

Today I think,

God is good but He didn't fill the whole existence with goodness 

Yes the Truth is the Truth and the memory of existence would always be there, ready to be mended when we have acquired the ability to retrieve them. Still, suffering is so not Godly. 

However no one scrutinizes Satan. Why? Because Satan is Satan? That it is given that it's supposed to be bad? Well here I say Satan should antagonize itself, taste its own medicine. Actually it has, the fact that some bad things have been done over with, diseases eradicated, some pain has been relieved, animosities resolved, shows that Satan have been eating it's own excrements. Why not do it more and more?

God is here and He is always available to be scrutinized, people do it all the time. Isn't that freedom?

But the audacity of God's adversary to lie and deceive and to cause mishaps, sorrow, depression... while people glorify it as if it's the embodiment of strength. It's the embodiment of avoidance of responsibilities, the enemy, negativity of humanism and negativity of sustainability. It kept on spewing reasons to be spiteful about goodness, morality, integrity, and honesty, after that people think it's cool that such arguments were spawned. Disgusting, while God keep on working... laughter is available, comfort is available, company is available, reliefs are available, beauty is available, amazement and inspiration are available, such have kept people inclining to do good things, lovely things, sustainably.

Obviously bad is bad... not enough

The devil is in the details.

The strength of God is conspicuous, existence with all its glory. The sun and the other stars, the moon and the beauty of the night. Our continuing body and its prevalent life as of now, the complexity of our biology, and the deepness of our thoughts. It seeks justice and many times its needs and wants have been fulfilled. The strength of God manifests, the work of God is perpetual, if such things were done by human beings people would greatly praise them, but people overlooked the goodness of God to focus on things that are bad. How we are missing all the momentum that's there for us to ride on. 

So in conclusion, as we do to God himself we'd be liable to do the same to ourselves. Appreciate our greatness and keep on building on it. Everything's going to be alright, don't stop, keep on trying.

The Culture of Conflict

Conflict is inevitable, as the world changes or as time is time, our property changes in quality and shape constantly. Through observation of the truth and wisdom, we maintain the relevance and the power of our ownership in the face of problems that were coming. In order to draw the line of property, the line where we could scale up our assets or our freedom to maneuver reality, we use negotiation products such as culture and law, contracts and understanding of each others' resources. We learn about them, made derivatives, and plan our lives in reverence to them. In the process of establishing what's good, conflicts arise due to clashes of interests, perceptions, and understanding. Those are inevitable because the world keeps on changing. 

This is where the problem lies, that people had been trying to not have conflict for a long while. That's wrong in my opinion and that's what makes conflicts more and more filled with animosity and damages. The opposite would be true if people kept on fighting each other every day. The problem is due to avoidance of responsiblities people incorporated innuendos in their conflicts. So PROBLEMATIC! there is the lies in the nature of the utterance which breeds hatred, unclearness which adds to unclear lines of boundaries between each others' properties, unanswerableness which adds to frustration, intimidation/ power virtue signalling which undermine the freedom of the innocent. 

You don't want unclearness in your conflict. I think once we realize this we could abuse the fact that conflict would breed solutions and brought the truth into light, reduce hatred, increase understanding, invoked different configurations of networks, clear bold lines of properties (high quality), also fun and thrilling and psychologically therapeutic. 

However when stakes are high, there's higher motivation to be hostile and to lie and to intimidate etc, such things are beyond me. Together with that though it means that while the stakes are low, try to get into conflict as much as possible. You don't want a little conflict to brought out your pent up hatred and frustration from your previous problems. The more conflicts you explore, the more you'd be able to compartementalize different contexts and different opponents, different spirits that were being faced, whats fair and just, and the wiggle room to fight without hatred, being casual, and fun. 

In the end what you're going to get out of it is your freedom, knowledge, and new configurations of relationships that would be relevant to the ever changing reality. 

Stop piling up danger, hatred, and frustrations. Start owning and liberating

Embrace conflict and have fun

Ketchup Dispenser at Restaurants

 In order to reduce the use of single use plastic for ketchup a dispenser could be put that could scan receipts of customers and associate it with their quotas (that would expire at the end of the day). So some people doesn't want too much ketchup, they don't have to take it all while those who just can't get enough would get the maximum quota allocated to the corresponding receipt. 

This should also work for soda and other things such as ice cream. The aplication could also be used for vending machines at buffet. So for an all you can eat buffet there might be a combo package with some certain types of food that are bonuses or not all you can eat. For such purpose a vending machine that could recognize each receipts could be useful. 

Receipts have a lot of potentials, other than those things that I've pointed they could also be useful for promotions or bonuses at other things. If there were applications that would recognize receipts, businesses could cooperate and recognize each others' customers, gave them special treatments. Electronic receipts could be saved or stored so that one day businesses could identify long time customers. 

Receipts could also be used for marketing purposes, one would prefer to toggle what kinds of advertisements they are willing to see at times. Do they felt like exploring something new from completely different authors? Or do they want to browse upon something from a place they usually like?

Invigoration v.03

Today I think about inflation in the economy after watching/listening to Dr. Robert Shiller's interview with Nick Yekani on Youtube. 

Let's say there were 3 fruit producers in the economy, each of them has 10 fruits, apples, oranges, and pears. Each fruits worth the same, 1 could be exchanged with 1. One day there came another producer with dragon fruit into the economy, he also has 10 fruits. 

Without money they traded dragon fruit 1 to 1 also, but if there were money things became complicated. Let's say they had 30$ in the economy, each dollar represents 1 fruit. Upon the entering of the 4'th producer, each dollar would represent 1.3333 fruits. So to bring the economy to the way they would do it without the money 10$ should be added into the economy, inflation. 

In reality considerations are crazy more than that and the magnitude of the issue is crazy greater as well. I think what enables policy makers to stay above the water is the fractal nature of reality. If you've seen a fractal zoom video on Youtube you'd see that simplicity zoomed into complexities and complexities given enough processing power would zoom into simplicity. That processing power is/are the thinkers, the voyagers, and the adventurers of reality, the collection of their fruits of thoughts. 

So further into the issue I identified some issues (lol):

1. Would that mean that in a growing economy new amounts of money should always be generated?

2. What about the current situation where the economy contracted, are stimulus packages bad or the opposite of what should've been done?

The answer is sustainability right, if the economy is growing in a sustainable way then generating more amounts of money would be a balance that's conservative. If the growth of goods and services were out of the increases of detrimental illegal drugs lets say, then the generation of the amounts of money would only spread the sickness faster. 

(By sustainability I mean goodness, the inclination to keep on inclining forever Truthfully, the increase of abilities and the desires to live life all the time. True Justice). 

If the economy was contracting than the generation of stimulus packages would do:

1. People would have all the money to spend, then the desire, but they were told to stay at home. 

2. People with saved up cash would lose the ability to buy, they'd have to work, but they were told to stay at home. 

Basically all the energy but nowhere to channel it. (I'm not an expert, so all this is just my amateur opinion). 

But it works out because cash spent by people at low income were spent on basic necessities. Providers of basic necessities were not appreciated enough in the past so this is a balance. However you can't keep on going this way. In this situation the main heroes of the economy are the people at the COVID handling department, this is where all the goods and services were provided. I mean, the value of the goods and services were strategically concentrated there. 

Money invigorates the economy, it enables people to store values and close deals. Basically a really potent lubricator of search frictions in the economy*. What we want from all those energy is goodness, and it would be a huge miss of an opportunity not to channel those energy to the COVID handling department. 

*https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/advanced-economicsciences2010.pdf, market with search frictions by Peter Diamond, Dale Mortensen, and Christopher Pissarides winners of the nobel prize in economics 2010.

----------------------------------

So if you make the doctors and the nurses super rich in theory, naturally this is appropriate for the economy. Should be appropriate in so many different ways, what I could think of maybe:

1. People would listen to rich people, so when they were told to adopt a discipline there's a huge motivation to listen.

2. The shopping would be towards things that are appropriate, like psychologist and psychiatrists, massage therapists, properties, investment in health industries, investment in health researchs. 

3. The setbacks suffered by other sectors would be appropriate, for example tourism would lean towards catering to the rich people where all the businesses should came from. That would heal the economy nicely. 

4. Kids would aspire to be like them, or those who don't at least take aspects and qualities of these people to be elite, or highly regarded. Which is appropriate

5. ...

What kind of look needs to be brought back v.02

For curly hairs / afro: The 60's 70's disco suits, stripes of contrasting colors, bell bottoms, draped long sleeves.

For asian people: We tend to have our own good and bad colors, and would look really good on the good ones or really bad on the bad ones. T - Shirt combined with bracers like basketball bracers or tennis bracers would work really well on the right colors.
Red tends to make the female stand out, some people dare not to do that but if a lot of people are doing that then it should be acceptable. The world would be more beautiful.

For SEA people: Stripes of yellow on black is something that would work well. Hints of yellow or patterns of yellow on top of black. Yellow or Gold. White and brown should be good as well. Just 2 colors. If it were blue, then blue with red.
Vests, army vests or non army vests.

For male Javanese: I'm telling you, blankon, short trousers, shirtless... everybody should go for it.
But no one's going to do that so, javanese style shirt (formal) paired with regular trousers or buttoned shorts. Somehow if you could make short sleeve work then that would also be nice.  

Accessories: Suspenders, it would work well for short people.

To keep working momentum up v.02

Problems come seasonally, while people were in a season where everything's available and they had the option to not work, there's a need for keeping up the working momentum otherwise when the trouble times came people would have to pay a huge price to reverse inertia or whatever. 

Tell them, thell them that we need to still keep up the working momentum and that everybody should allocate everyday some training times. Rather than obliging people to serious responsibilities that were not really needed, that would cause senses of entitlements that were off harmony or inappropriate. So tell us that we are training for the difficult times and that training is training and such is still some responsiblities and for so were some "extra UBI" or additional rewards (a little). 

Where to find discipline and integrity nowadays

The pandemic has brought us into a situation where the forefront of the spirit of discipline and integrity is focusing in the hospital, among the doctors and nurses, and they are hanging their lives unto it as well as everybody else's.

In my opinion if companies or youngsters wanted to search/outsource for the spirit of integrity and discipline currently is the moment where it's obvious where to look.

The Wisdom Department

Any kinds of organizations should be able to implement this:

The wisdom department's job is to make assumptions, to compare the assumptions with reality, and to formulate explanations over the discrepancies. Each sections have their own division, so there's a separation of duties there. 

The quality of the department's work is measured by how many information it could produce, through the journey of figuring out how to make better assumptions in the future, that lead to policy changes or new policies or increased confidence. For every results such as so should consitute bonuses or rewards for the employees or the members of the wisdom department. 

For example if you are one of the tax collection agencies, you would make assumptions over whether or not levels of tax participation would increase or decrease after the COVID19 social subsidies by the government. The accuracy of the assumption would be compared to real data, and the reason why there was a discrepancy to the estimation would be formulated. Usually, during this formulation process you could find a problem or a better solution of doing things, or even an unidentified fraud. Such results should constitute rewards from other departments of your organization.

My proposition of a "Dual Currency" system v.03

Here's an argument: (I formulated it this way when I watched the 2021 Berkshire Hathaway's Shareholder meeting)

If Communism doesn't work because it failed to attribute rewards to the contributors, (capitalists being those who saved up resources instead of consuming them and instead of consuming them in the future after they've accumulated, they risked it in assets or businesses to benefit the market) and communist economies failed because they won't reward the capitalists as well as not prioritizing the importance of rewards for contributors as the strong growth factor of the economy...

Then in order to maintain and enhance the prosperity of an economy, a country must favor the principal of rewarding the sources of solutions respectfully. 

Now, if that's the case then the welfare program, as well as the escalating rates of taxes were against this logic of what's positive for the economy. Welfares were given under the reason of poverty, not out of contributions, therefore people who managed to elevated their own income would've been worse off than when they were still poor, or unable to raise the income level, because they would've lost the welfare if they decided to keep up their income level. In the case of escalating taxes it is similar even though milder, for when one has achieved a certain threshhold of salaries (usually due to excellence in contributions), the government "penalized" them with higher rate of taxes. 

Such were the arguments, mind that such in all was not a statement of my position on the issue, I'm just presenting the arguments. 

These arguments are not saying that the government or the people don't deserve the taxes nor the poor people don't deserve the welfare, I'm just trying to present a logical probem where it demonstrated hindrance for one's economy from performing better. There might very well be a counter argument to this that's True. 

-----------------

Now in case the problem is real, how would one mitigate it?

A dual currency system could be an alternative solution:
Step one adopt a cryptocurrency,
Step two tax every transactions using the cryptocurrency but such tax would be the only form of tax in relation to it. 

There you go, that's the solution. For in every transactions that happened in an economy using official governmental currencies, there's definitely the government's contribution there, good governance. That's what gives a governmental currency their value, albeit people's acknowledgement, but where did all of the acknowledgements came from? It came from the government's work of keeping the country safe, politically stable, people are helpful, smart, and willing to respect each other's "properties". Otherwise people would never be willing live under the government, in the long term.

So I think, such tax is better than the traditional way of taxing. Lets say that everyday people bought a sack of rice and the government took 0.1% of it. Within 1000 transactions of sacks of rice the government would've gotten 1 sack of rice, if a country had 1.000.000 people and everyday they traded 50.000 sacks of rice then the government would've made 50 sacks of rice everyday just from rice transactions alone. Now this is just a low estimate because the taxation cared not whether it is for productive purposes or for consumption purposes, every transactions were taxed and that's it. So imagine the potential, while at the same time the legitimacy, while at the same time the prevention of a type of money laundering. So good of an idea isn't it? if all the premises were true.

What happened to the regular paper currencies? I think the usual system could still be applied. I'm not about drastic revolutionary changes of the economy, especially based off of something that's too new. In this case this is more like an add on rather than a revolution.

Oh and in the case of welfare the government should acknowledge that the presence of people constitutes the presence of justice. It is much more desirable to live among the mass rather than to be secluded in a nowhere place. People's presence alone are contributions to each other, therefore the longer a person lived the more they've contributed to justice (unless there were crimes then likely those are negative contributions). So implement UBI but unequal UBI based on people's ages, the older they got the more they earn. Such UBI could relieve the burden from companies (minimum wages) and they could focus on being evolutionarily getting more and more effective and efficient at what they do. 

Such UBI also could be implemented gradually, starting from 100 years old people, as the countries' prosperity increased, they could increase the trickling down to younger and younger ages. 

The real time waster

The real time waster is evil, the potential for misallocation of resources. 

You could be sitting there doing nothing, and you'd be observing justice and injustice, so you'd be doing better than those that do some trade offs of good and bad and failed to profit good. Of course doing nothing could be evil as well of course, but it could be a wise decision as well. For some, doing a lot of those is better than the alternatives, for some it is not (unfortunately people like to over generalize).

So, the real time waster is evil, just don't be evil.

The guilt of the collective

As a group people tend to be more bold in doing the wrong things, as long as they are together. The guilt is not felt by the individual, but the group could feel guilty. 

You see when the group culturally looks for other group's fault, by policy. Something like, as a member of the group it is virtuous to make other groups to do the same things that you guys usually do, spreading the habit. While the habit itself if were done separately would be considered as wrong/evil. It is virtuous to report to the group if one found some other guys / people and also individuals performed such things in hiding.

The feeling of guilt is not there, but the symptoms of a guilty person exists for the group as a whole. When we are guilty we are more sensitive to the fault of others, in a way that we could form or find better sanctuaries from accountability. 

During the pandemic we distant ourselves from our group, and we felt guilty as f**k. That's that, we need our group to unfelt that, but that's not good actually. So ask yourselves what is that? What are the things that we are doing wrong as a collective? Of course the obvious ones, but that means there were some not obvious ones hiding behind the obvious ones too. What are those?

Humility

Wisdom really separates between a robot and a sentient being. 

Having all the knowledge and the processing procedure with all the speed, still a myriad of times slower than wisdom. 

Absolute wisdom? Nah, but the pursuit of it

Excitement

Love

Fortresses v.04

There are ways that our ancestors and us survived throughout time:

1. Defecating

2. Copulating

3. Lying

4. etc (but I wanted to talk around those three now)

So we couldn't help but to do all those three. If only we could be free from those, but we needed them. 

Therefore in order to fortify our sterileness we have the toilet, our sovereignity of our privacy and mental properties we have spouses, but in terms of the usefulness of information? 

We are blessed with PvP, Sparring, and Humor

The frame of it all is accountability, all parties could acknowledge, measure, comprehended to a fair extent what each other was doing at the end of the day. 

Exploration of vulnerabilities, but as vaccines instead of diseases. We should keep it that way

---------------------------

>Weapons... weapons are different

>PvE is PvP vs the developer and/or the A.I, and/or the archetypes

>If private masturbation is enough then it should be enough (I'm not sure), but lots of people need another person to be enough it seems.

I understood better my taste in jokes v.02

I like jokes that if you asked about them later to be explained, the utterers/the comics wouldn't put themselves in bad positions explaining them clearly (of course there were nuances but that's the rule of thumb). 

It's like good jokes vs innuendos, they are subtle but one was explainable nicely out in the open the other you face retaliation jeopardizing your freedom in public out of being accused of as a mental hospital patient material (because you tried to asked people what they were really saying). 

---------------------

Things that avoid accountability avoids it for a reason

The Self and the Investment v.05

Whim doesn't define a person, an exercised whim might be a person's responsibility, but still doesn't define a personality. 

I'm not a psychologist but I concur to the idea that people's personalities are complex and unique. Unfortunately somehow the society believe that a person could be defined by their whim and that is the real person. Why?

There's the third person, the auditor, the consciousness, what about those sides of a personality how about them? So if you think you are your whim, then let there be that way. I define myself as I am officially, as what I clearly said, as what I clearly declare, other than that are unofficial and most often the incomplete me. 

That incomplete me might be mean, might be evil, might dictate what I wanted to do, but in the end what I did mostly not dictated by that side of me. Please human beings have the decency of bringing this brain capability to the table, please. 

Stop making assumptions about people's personalities based on some shallow aggregations, you yourself are too big for that, so don't put other people inside that small compartment. People have different ways of acting and discerning, a threatening monstrous capability and inclinations shouldn't define the entirety of a person. A soft person could have stolen from, robbed, and killed multiple people, that is more reliable of a sign (statistics) but even that might not be complete. 

The context upon what I'm saying is, I dislike how people could be punished by other people for their words' innuendos. Should I describe more? A tendency of a person to be hurtful is a part of a personality, but the personality it is not. Someone with a knife might be a robber, but might also be a chef, if you got rid of knives from everybody, then chefs wouldn't be able to cut with a knife.

Invest your identity in you that are clear, otherwise you that are clear is a lie.

------------------------------

If I were to create a company, it would be cool and hip to name it The Truth is the Protocol or TTITP or TTTP in the share market. But in case of somebody has taken the initial, I'm going to have to settle with TTIT, T_T

---------------------------------------

Group vs Individuals

It is really hard to make a complicated group. Individuals lived with themselves for the rest of their lives, their traits and fragments of their consciousness were fond with each other and they grew together. Groups that could equal that is too rare to make a consideration. You lived with each other for how long? Do you even like one another and willing to grow together? 24x7?

So if you identify yourself as a group, then that group's characteristics, that aggregation, that simple easy to blend commonalities are going to be huge part of your individual. Don't, well that might be true, like your real hair would be black if you're an asian or your body weak if you're a woman, but don't let your personality revolves around it, around the blackness of the hair, and the weakness of the body, cause there's so much more to you. Made this mistake and along the way people couldn't but to deny their exposures (had to lie), because they would be too vulnerable... their mistake.

(be a member of a group only for a necessity or a context, after that be a distinct individuals even in front of the "enemy". Never miniscule our membership as living beings, and as human beings, as creatures of mass, as biological organisms... so many groups we're missing out to be a part of just for the sake of being a member of an exclusive constraint).

----------------------------------------

Being part of a group is lovely, being part of a million and trillion groups are million and trillion times the loveliness, being part of millions and trillions and more of advanced groups are (...) times the loveliness, and I want that. It is so underwhelming being limited to just one or two unsynergized fake shallow group or groups. 

No one don't want that, after all, but the protocol is the Truth, who then wants to acknowledge that?

The Reciprocal Sticker System (renewed idea from the Golden Sticker)

The reciprocal sticker is my imaginary system addressing this problem:

Sometimes creators/authors created the kinds of solutions that are just not worth going through the official intellectual property protection procedures, or they were just too reluctant to go through the process.

Therefore, in the mean time, why not social media companies do this:

Allow Creators, Authors, Content Creators to put their mark ("sticker") in people's profile page for a tiny cost.

Everytime a person contributes goods and services or money to the authors, the authors could opt to leave their sticker as a sign that the person has been a reciprocal person. 

The benefit of having these stickers in your profile page is, that they could be signs for other creators that it is a good idea to give you easier access to their own goods and services (because you are a reciprocal person). 

For the creators especially the small ones it is an extra way to get income from day to day people, instead of having to wait for a break from a big corporation.

While we, when we check on other people's profile page, we could tell what are the things that our network appreciates and what better ways we could contribute to it. 

Don't miss this! v.04

Just because you got what you deserve and others haven't, doesn't mean that you don't deserve it.

Maybe you got only a fraction of what you deserve and others got the less fraction of theirs, doesn't mean that you don't deserve it all. 

Just because someone didn't get as much as he deserved less than everybody else, doesn't mean that it's not evil already

Adulthood v.05

In my opinion, the public should recognize adulthood as:

1. One who pledged to always prioritize justice in his/her conducts or interactions

2. Could be held responsible. Could be reasoned with. Meaning that the person has the ability to understand what rules are, and when someone was not being fair/just.

So an adult is someone who has a good sense of justice always (since we are not perfect yet, we settle for common relativity for the sense of justice)

------------------------------------

Some people won't prioritize this, so they should not be allowed in public interactions.

However inadequacy doesn't constitute unwillingness. So I felt it's fair to have people define their own parameters based on their own definitions of justice and reject people out of their collective properties. As long as their standards were not against the law or Justice itself.

my definition of Justice: Justice is when everyone gets whatever they wanted and needed whenever they wanted or needed them.

Since we are not there yet, the Truthful progress towards there is our current Justice. (and since the Truth is Truthfully everything, all Truthful point of views are respectfully Truthful, not just the point of views of the authorities).

But simply put: You can't be an adult if you won't prioritize justice.

------------------------------------

Being an adult one would have this consideration: How am I supposed to know what is Truly good? I might need all the knowledge in the world, all the point of views that there is. 

Indeed I agree, and that's what I call absolute Justice. 

How do we judge whether a person is being decent or not, having a good sense of Justice or not? How do we say how much compensation one must make in order to be responsible? Who could possibly know what's really Just everytime? 

Is it in the law?, in the intuition?, it's in the popular consensus, it's in the guidelines of the experts and the leaders, it's in the beauty of it!, no, it's in logic and common sense, it's in your heart, it's hidden where it couldn't be known, no it is not, it's nowhere...

It's so tiring, why not just settle with what is peaceful, that's it, who cares about Justice... (let the extortionists won, power rules).

But then, when are we ever going to move on?

It's in where it is, and it's there...

When you're an adult you try, because you always tried, you knew how hard it is... 

and you keep on trying

----------------------------------

In the end, it comes down to personal property. Minding your own business, defending your grounds... even when that is not fair / unjust, at least the alternatives are definitely not "Just" from your point of view. 

Your point of view is your Truth, the God in you, what else are you supposed to rely on?

---------------------------------

If your truth is a lie, how could it be compatible sustainably? And if your facts are True but your wisdom is wrong, wouldn't it still be a lie? 

Justice is impossible? then what do you call people getting what they wanted and needed? Justice manifests all the time to a lot of people... 

The problem lies in when it didn't happen, and even that is not a good enough reason to stop being an adult. That is the reason to be an adult.

Why don't you try to buy for the Truth and Wisdom? with your time, with your mind, with your assets? What is shown in public, how hopeless things are... yet they didn't change the fact of advancements in technology and civilization, philosophy and morality, relationships. 

Why won't anyone be an adult?

-----------------------------

Now it comes down to my subjective suggestion, if you want your selfishness be Truthfully Just then give thanks. The more you give thanks to your sources of solutions the more you become a part of the circuit of mutual solutions, the preservation of it. 

Whether your mind would be vested interested in it, whether your position in the civilization of the society, whether your quantum presence... supposedly. 

Think about it, right? Why wouldn't it be? 

I don't understand bullying

I had a conversation with my sister yesterday and I realized, I acted like I understood bullying, but I couldn't quite pin it down.

What is bullying? Is it kept on doing what others disliked? But that's just friendship, or a part of friendship, or any human relationship. 

Or was it doing what others clearly disliked up to a certain point of discomfort?

Then is life bullying you everyday, or is it your untrained emotions? Or, is being bullied always mean being victimized, or you just got upset too easily... But then again the definition of bullying is where the problem is.

Harmful bullying vs Acceptable bullying

---------------

From professional definitions online, bullying is all about being harmful. So... Google searching, I should've done that before

Vividization of Risks v.05

It would be great if there was a tool (maybe with the help of A.I) to project risks in numbers and colors like the weather channel. So that people who contributed to the lowering of the risk, their contribution would be so blatant it is easier to reward them appropriately. 

Currently people just tend to reward what is immidiate rather than what is wise. If risks of pandemic, wars, crimes, etc were greatly exposed to everybody, even better if we could filter local risks such as accidents or traffic jams, this would be the direction that could significantly increase the wisdom of the system including the rewarding mechanism if done well.

Discipline is Discipline v.02

Why are you disciplining yourself, why are you denying your desire?

When you've got what you wanted, or the worthiness of it changed, stop the discipline!

Discipline must not be forever... the people you know might like you when you are disciplined, they might want what you could achieve, they might love you as a machine... but they don't love you as a self

Pleasure might not be what defines you, but your pleasure is a part of yourself. Keep on denying yourself is self transforming, but why would you want to do that if you don't hate who you are?

Everything has a purpose, everything that matters, physicall and spiritually. 

If they don't then they'd be a part of the chaos (second law). 

Why are you disciplining yourself, have you achieved what you are looking for, is it still worth it?

Cause I might be witnessing a type of person who is capable of disciplining the self non-stop, a person who is just wired that way. 

I'm worried... please... a person like that is special for sure, but stop wanting the acknowledgement... you are who you are. Greed is good if it is for Love, Love is eternal... Greed is stupid if it is for things that are temporary, then the Greedy person is losing instead of gaining in the end. 

God is Love

Empathic Sufferings v.08

So I picked up where I left off of My Hero Academia series in Sushiroll and I watched the duel between Deku and Bakugo, in this duel Bakugo having gone through some serious ordeal, also had been suffering from an "Empathic suffering", which has became the reason for their duel. 

I'm not going to spoil the story so I'm going to continue to my own explanation of the Empathic suffering.

So suffering is useful in discipline not only to burn things in your memory, but upfront sufferings are useful to give a sense of improvement to your subconscious when next being required to change to a disciplined lifestyle (otherwise you'd just feel that the discipline is a net negative for your comfort throughout time). 

But sufferings don't have to be experienced directly all the time, they could be acquired through association (with pre-experienced sufferings), empathy with other people, empathy to your future self, giving thanks to your sources of solutions, etc, and of course the combination of them. 

Empathy is a very effective and efficient way of incorporating sufferings, but you got to watch out for things that you're empathetic about might be a story of lies. 

Empathy to your future self is like you saw the world is moving faster than you, or the person who was always behind you now accelerating much faster than you do, this might not be a very good indicator of your performance, but it is a point of consideration nonetheless. 

(Disclaimer: Everybody's situation is different so if you bask yourself in the wrong attitude, please don't, you'd scale up the mistake. So don't sweat yourself over other people's rapid or slow improvement, because human beings and their developments are seriously dangerous things to oversimplify). 

Having said that, when you perceived the people around you through the lens of your expertise, you could find indicators of what your future position is going to be. Whether it is bad or good, danger or opportunities, or both, you could derive ambitions out of that and from there the endurance needed to get into a discipline. 

Measure carefully the value of your sufferings compared to the discipline, if you haven't got enough then you haven't got enough, be honest to yourself and make policies accordingly.  

Edit: There's another important thing to notice too, if you still have access to the comfortable or fun stuff alternative to the discipline... still going to be a problem. What you can do is to oversaturate the fun so it became undesirable if its safe, and/or commit to not do it as a part of the discipline.

So the point of me saying this is... make the discipline the remedy of your sufferings not other things.

Plus in addition to successfully completing the discipline, the reward of the marathon should taste even more rewarding for your mind.

-------------------------------------

Suffering through giving thanks:

The way this works for me is: Firstly I internalize this notion:

"The scarcity of the world is not of time nor energy nor money but of mutual solutions, solutions are unlimited but we are so limited because we are not giving back enough to our sources of solutions."

Now, this gets me started, then I would try to sacrifice some of my resources to try to solve the problems of the people who have solved my problems. In the end I would be left off with less resources... now all of the sufferings in my life after this, would be in the premise of "Because I gave thanks", Because I gave thanks I experience these difficulties, I could've made it easier if I had more... sure... but, now I'm a more of a positive part of the growth of the level of availability of mutual solutions in reality. My investment is in the positive, I'm interested in the betterment of the reality, I have acquired the seed of ambition... of the harmony of Justice. 

So now everytime there's something bad happening, I'm motivated by anger (suffering), there's something good happening, I'm refreshed, and then motivated by wanting to be a part of it (suffering), now the world is my suffering and my happiness. 

(Disclaimer: There's a humanly limit to sufferings at a time, if things were already beyond your grip, it is not something that I could understand nor it is something I know how to deduce making me qualified to imply everything here. What I know is when you win above it, something unique happened that is precious. That something is your original solution)

----------------------------------------

Personally, for me, suffering is not something to be shared to other people (unless it was for something relevant). 

More than that suffering is not something to be experienced by other people, I hate policies that impose sufferings to other people. 

The prove of my suffering is in my performance

A valuable aim v.05

I like the sound of: "A world where unpleasant words have little to no effect to the progress of Justice/Prosperity/Civilization in people"

I think this angle has a lot of value to offer, given that other types of progress are queueing with businesses and workers to further the causes while this one is not. 

Humor for example, Insult battles (Insulting rap battles), Gaming actually, Martial Arts, Competitive Sports, Fitness training, Forgiveness and Understanding (Communal Activities) like Support Groups, Podcasts, Psychological Therapy, Psychiatry, 

Ok I see... 

But, the hindrance of this... innuendos/disrespectful negotiations, lying flatteries, unjust/unfair reputational attacks

Are underrated as dangerous patterns to propagate. 

Should there be a law against them like other dangerous/malicious acts? Yes, but current law needs to be simplified and made more user friendly too, and that's also imperative, otherwise this would just be ignored.

-----------------------

Another problem I dislike is people with guilt in their heart lashing over me or other people blaming our "annoying" "mannerless" "disrespectful" acts, while actually it is guilt that is eroding them from the inside. I know this from experience. And I'm not saying that your guilt is yours to blame, maybe its not, maybe you picked it up from other people you emphatize with (without them saying anything). But all of the above dangerous acts are not helping, they make things worse for your articulation and self control.

And consider this too, the guilt is embedded within the culture, over something that already passed 100 years ago... How about that?

My impression of thumbnails of Leonardo da Vinci's Paintings v.04

So I watched Utada Hikaru's conversation with Hideaki Anno (accessed June 2021), and I don't understand a lot of it, because its in Japanese. So I went to the translation video and found out that she had a deep experience with Leonardo da Vinci's St John the Baptist. 

Long I have been wondering how could people experience paintings in a profound level, so I tried to search for the pictures. I didn't experience too much emotions (I experienced something at the beginning, but then its gone) but they are certainly engaging, for just thumbnails of them. 

These are the ideas invoked at the experience:

- They have multiple angles people could take and relate themselves to. The deeper you immerse yourself the more you could experience, but to optimize the experience you should expand yourself into the depths of the universe. The further you've been the more there it is that you could understand about them. 

- Leonardo da Vinci has different versions of Jesus and John the Baptist, and he has a more realistic version where Jesus was not beautiful, and the archetypal versions where Jesus was like portrayed in the picture. From these archetypal pictures I wandered on why he drew it that way

- Since his pictures were for the consumptions of nobles and kings at the time I assume he painted the contents of their hearts. How being a male with such qualities at the time was a luxury, therefore the feminine features. For many many parts of the world this is still relevant. Some of the things Jesus do, said, or feel and think was something that was considered would contribute to female features. 

- There is this idea of feminism as the source of life. In my opinion he was searching for the anatomy of this feminism. Herodias for example, is a kind of feminism, while the virgin was another kind. The life that stemmed out of the different kinds of feminism also would be different in respect... there were the ugly forms of results, there were the beautiful forms of results. So the way I understand it is, if you change the woman inside you, you'll change your life. 

- The Mona Lisa could mean several things; Leonardo da Vinci's feminine, Lady Wisdom, The Archetype of a perfect female, his mother.

- St John the Baptist, the spirit of Elijah, if the Mona Lisa was his feminine, is the portrayal of Leonardo da Vinci's confidence... now I'm going to stray too far without relevant bases (even for my standard) so I'm going to stop. 

I don't understand Privilege v.05

Privilege to me is being rich, acccess to money. But since people often use it when they were exposed to greatness I rationalize that that would be a privilege as well. But inside, I don't really get it personally.

If you're a singer and Ariana Grande performed with you, I get it. But if you catch Ariana Grande on the street and took a picture with autograph, I don't get it. 

Also you supposed to be able to use it to someone who won 20.000 dollars from the slot machine, but nobody says that like that. So really, is it really appropriate the way people who met with admirable people thought that they're privileged, or were they just lying / sucking up, why? 

-------------------------------

I think now I've understood it better. The reason why God put the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil in the garden, and prohibited the humans from eating them is:

It was a grant of privilege to become creatures of discipline. Gods, or children of God

The discipline was particularly unique, that it wasn't stem from some imminent senses of danger, nor beauty, but from consciousness and humility, wisdom. It was the privilege on the divine discipline, or law.

Bahasa Indonesia: Keistimewaan, Privilege.

Ya, bukan kehormatan, adalah sebuah keistimewaan kalau mendapat kehormatan ya, tapi kehormatan bukan privilege, keistimewaan adalah privilege.

Mindset v.03

If you believe that the world is unfair, unfair to you, you'll notice more and more how the world is unfair to you.

If you believe that the world has balancing mechanism, that its supposed to be fair, you'll figure out more and more, how the world is actually serving you justice (not a law, but a development)

So when the depression has passed, or has became passable, lets notice the wisdom that is calling for us to notice her

To separate between privacy sin and specialization/scaling up sin v.03

Often times people complained over working overtime or employees not wanting to work overtime while not contributing enough. Also I assume that the popular argument was that working overtime costs not only extra salary expenses but also productivity expenses in the future. 

I'm all for working effective and efficiently, utilizing the working hours as much as possible. But people often stopped after the notion that working overtime is bad, but looking at it deeper, there are at least 2 divisions of reasons why it is bad:

1. Invasion of privacy. People need their own time with themselves and their family, prying on this means the business would be perceived as a negative contributor to one's quality of life even though it is also the income source of the family. Salaries are supposed to support one's quality of life, but if the expense was the quality of life itself then its about margins. 

2. Specialization problem. If you worked overtime because you are doing multiple kinds of jobs at your workplace, say for example entertaining clients besides accounting, selling besides warehouse supervising, then its a specialization problem. I'm not saying a business supposed to only just do one thing, or a person, but the idea of scaling up is about multiplying your product exponentially. So no matter if it were done at working hours or outside of working hours, if that caused one to worked overtime then its another type of toil on the business (other than the privacy issue). 

So if your business had to work overtime, for most of us its inevitable, I would suggest that it would be for the things that were well defined as your products/services. If the components of your products/services were well defined, then the limit would be perceivable, the cost, and the benefit of the overtime as well and people would be able to internalize them and made it their own personal agenda (easier). If the business had no clear definition of the components then there's the impression of endlessness of costs demanded from each employee. In turn this would contribute to the inclination of the employee feeling exploited, being treated inhumane, and all the evil things that would came after because the potential for them not being able to specialize and to have their own life were endless (even though maybe other businesses worked overtime more while having their employees less disgruntled than yours). 

But if the costs and the components of the products and the services provided by each people were well defined the owners would benefit as well as the employees, in the way that they could measure the performance of the employees, the management, identify points of adjustments, perceived costs of adjustments or non-adjustments (economical, monetary, mental, property-wise, legal-wise, etc etc), and made smart decisions that would otherwise wouldn't be possible due to obscurity . 

Got one of those dreams

I dreamt of a title "BLUE SAGA" the font is similar to SEGA's trademark. There's a boy main character at the front, his blue hair was very long and tied in twin tails left and right, pretty unusual for a boy. He's wearing an orange basketball jersey, I didn't catch the numbers written on it. His shorts were pale blue, he was holding a stick, like a long flute but not a flute just a stick. The stick had a little metal circle at the tip, like one of those on a fishing rod... maybe it was a fishing rod, but maybe not because its also too short for a fishing rod. He was staring far away towards the far sky, cause he was staring up far in a distance. The shot or my point of view was from the floor looking at him, like I was taking his picture while laying on the floor. The sunlight was in his face but since this is an anime like picture there was no glare... behind him was blue sky with some clouds. 

I knew this was one of those dreams I haven't had for a while. Some of these dreams happened in real life like de ja vu. If this one is not I certainly don't want to forget it, somehow, it's something.

my UBI (Universal Basic Income) suggestion v.28c

I believe that the presence of human beings are presence of Justice, by just being there you contributed to the interest of all of us. Maybe you were sitting outside your home with friends at night, that might have prevented a passerby being assaulted, maybe you were sleeping on the streets, you might noticed how dirty the streets are or how bad the weather has become, maybe you accompanied others who were also sleeping on the streets and improved their sense of security/company. Maybe you were talking with your friends inside a public transportation, and people who listened understood some stuffs that are important for them. Maybe you were living in an obscure place that people usually threw their trash at, now because of your presence they rethought on whether they should change their dirty habits. Maybe there are injustice happening in your city, and if it were not for your presence, people wouldn't had enough people to resisted the injustice, and because you guys resisted the problem didn't spread to other areas. 

We as human beings have common needs and common interests and that's what make us all friends with each other, creatures of justice where we are all vested interested in increasing the level of availability of mutual solutions for all (materially, mentally, sustainably). Scarcity might made us enemies, but through ingenuity we are together in overcoming it. 

Having said that I therefore presented how I'm a supporter of UBI (Universal Basic Income), I think it is capitalistic (meritocratic), and that it is fair. However due to scarcity we need stages on how we would begin the UBI:

1. Start from the oldest groups of populations because they are the longest in being there for everybody else. 

2. As the country increased their prosperity, proceed to younger and younger groups but at smaller amounts. There should be inequality in the amounts. This also should prevented the abuse of the system, increasing pregnancy in the family (just for the sake of money), because minors tend to not get portions of UBI. 

3. Take away UBI from crime doers or perpetrators. 

We don't have to make sure that the amounts suffice for basic needs at start, we just have to do it so that the society would be incentivized more in participating positively for the economy. 

-------------------------------

Edit: the reason why capitalism is meritocracy is people who accumulated wealth just for the sake of buying assets deserve all the profits by the virtue of merit. Do you realize how much they've contributed in sacrificing their consumption of their rightful earnings in order to buy capital goods? Firstly capital goods can't be eaten, can't be consumed (because they must be used for the business), and there's a high high chance that entrepreneurs might not be profitable. So it is not just postponing rewards, it is sacrificing rewards, and that is why capitalists deserve all the profit. Not mentioning the work they put after acquiring and running the asset. 

But by just suffering in order to punch the wall or the stone is not going to solve the world's hunger, the suffering. Sleeping while your robot was planting crops and make the most out of it would. The true value of meritocracy lied behind the ingenuity not the sufferings. If a lot of entrepreneurs failed, some of them failed due to lack of ingenuity. I'm not saying that I celebrate that, but the value of meritocracy, capitalism supposedly is not in the sacrifice, not in the sufferings, but in the appropriateness and the ingenuity of the solutions. How would we ever going to encourage entrepreneurs if we won't incentivize them strategically? After all, labors always negotiate using hardships as their leverage (please stop doing this and start using ingenuity instead, it's just infuriating and came across as extorting). 

---------------------------------

Are hassle worthless? Of course no, consider these two:

1. What's the minimum hassle required to deliver the solution? More than that it's supposed to be worthless. (So if there were available robots that could deliver more than a human being, the human's hassle is worthless already)

2. How rare was the availability of the hassle? Minimum salary is the government's attempt to increase the rarity of the hassle or to prevent the overabundance of the hassle. The purpose was to prevent companies or entrepreneurs from unfairly switch to another person who offered cheaper price that's inhumane. 

Here is what's not being monitored, are the minimum payments prevented the solutions from being delivered into the world? Are the severance payments prevented the employment of excellence? Are the requirements created barriers against new entrepreneurs from growing their ventures?

To answer this, test it with this question; Would the lowering of the restrictions ended up stifling the growth of entrepreneurship because it would favor monopoly? If yes then the lowering of the restrictions were pointless, but if it would favor the growth and the sustainability of entrepreneurship then it must be done. 

In the end, if UBI was thoroughly implemented, then we could lower the restrictions. The ultimate achievement of the restrictions were giving people sustainable income. When UBI was able to achieve this, then businesses would thrive because they would no longer be the ones who were gratisly employed with the worrying about the responsibility of the government. 

Inhumane salaries are unfair salaries given the contribution. But the sustainability of life, is the problem faced by everyone of us for everyone of us. Businesses should be just about businesses which is just about delivering the solution into the world, other than that are inhibitions. 

--------------------------------------------

Declining vs Increasing population:

This UBI, if I'm smart enough, This UBI is going to be the answer for both;

1. It would decrease people's initiative to have children as pension funds

2. It would decrease workplace intricacies in big corporations. Where entrepreneurship thrives, entrepreneurs would acquire a sense of self actualization other than financial stability. They would also blessed with time. These are preconditions to wanting to have kids. 

If you have a workplace that's politically unstable for you, unstable position, unstable minimal income, unstable time of work required... it would be a daredevil thing to have kids then. (Again employment regulations are more of an illusion in terms of this as it is not positively correlated with the level of availability of mutual solutions in reality. Independence or Entrepreneurship is more grounded in reality). 

---------------------------------------------

An honest government will be honest about their real sustainable power to provide UBI... to reinforce this, lies in political campaigns should not be favored. This is another problem that's also important

---------------------------------------------

Edit: 

This is hard, this is really hard not to make it ended up like a communistic failed economy. GDP per capita at least have to be in the equation (not as a measure of what a person deserves, but a measure of what the country could afford). Taxes would be very high... 

Diversified industry management tax (Monopoly/Oligopoly Tax)

If there were less than 7 companies controlling 75% of the market share in the industry (in a broad sense, defined based on the significance of the total revenues), eligible.

If there were less than 3 companies controlling 65% of the market share in the industry, extra eligible

If there were only 1 company controlling >45% of the market share, extra extra eligible.

All needs to be at relatively equal proportions

Something like that, but I'm not an economist, in this case empirical assessments is needed. In this whole thing, empirical assessments are needed. 

---------------------------------------------

If you are a government and implemented 0,5% transaction tax (within every fiat transactions there's a presence of good governance / contribution of the government there), then within 200 transactions the currency would've completed its cycle. Then you'd have the power to distribute more money without devaluing the currency. 

With the distribution of UBI or NI (national income) in my case, if the people were mostly blue collar, basic needs entrepreneurs would've thrived earlier/first. As the country became richer, the focus would be shifting gradually more towards secondary and tertiary goods and services. Such development is rational or healthy in my opinion, more stable/sustainable compared to if the secondary goods businesses were prioritized too early by the economy. 

So NI also acted to make sure this kind of pyramid or, as I prefer to call it, "ship" to grew strategically, aerodynamically, lowering the chance for the country to lost balance out of irrational consumptions.

Edit: If the people's buying power was too low, while the distribution of wealth of the economy was disproportionately in favor of secondary and tertiary goods due to monopoly/oligopoly, huge wealth gap, basic needs entrepreneurs wouldn't thrive early and secondary or tertiary goods would've thrived before most of the people could've grasped the appropriateness of them in the final analysis. The marketing world also would've leaned more towards selling these goods before basic needs goods and the bridging goods, goods that bridged income differences such as educational goods or cheap investment goods, or cost savings - utility goods. It is an increased risk of bad unsustainable spending. (If you played dota this is like your team didn't buy starting items and went straight mom/midas, daedalus, divine rapier... no bkb - herald countries). 

-------------------------------------------------

03/01/2022

Since the basis of this UBI is meritocracy we should pay attention also to the state of the economy in order to judge the magnitude of the positive presence. Therefore now I think that this UBI is better to be local rather than nationwide / global in terms of how much the amounts should be. Still if we want to be even more precise we would make layers of UBI, global, nationwide, province, city/village, district, families. 

If the economy was growing then their presence were positive, the magnitude of growth should scale the UBI also. 

By just being alive one would contribute to Justice. So don't let anyone say you deserve not what you have (unless it's illegal). 

Your life is relative to everything else, from there Justice. 

Your death leave memories of your presence, there from Justice. 

Your birth was standing on the shoulders of those before you, creatures of Justice. Your cuteness speaks of their legacy, your dawn is a celebration, your presence is the fruit of love of God. 

-------------------------------------------------

(at this point our economy probably could only afford 1000 rupiah at the end age group... and likely it would be 25. So we got to do about 1000 times better than this to make this matter. It could be done, and it could be done early because evil is just that disgusting and humans are really just that full of potentials). 

When Innuendo was mixed with sin / crime / evil v.02

When you've done good and at the same time you've had committed a crime as well, if you were brought to the court, the court might decide that your good deeds could cancel out with your bad deeds or a part of it. The rest of it might be forgiven through other ordeals, or payments. 

Now let's say if a rapist said, my life is hard therefore I raped. Then who cares about that hardship?

But if you stole something that could be paid off, the good that you've done would cover for it. If you lived in an innuendo world, as much good that you'd get out of it, that crime would keep on being there... no one's ever going to cancel it off, even if some said that you've deserved the cancel off, everyone else still think that you're indebted. 

So, why not just cancel it off? Why put yourself in a mess that a heinous sinner supposed to be in? You're being a smokescreen, a tool, and the payment you received is depression or narcissism or lies that felt good together with all of its problems to you and the people around you, including those who supposed to loved each other. 

I'm bad at this *sheet

I'm bad at dealing with sheets, bed sheets, bed cover sheets. 

So, wouldn't it be better if the bed had holes at each corner and the bed sheets has rubber screws to be attached in the bed? Then make the bed sheet in the form of an opened up dice, so at the sides of the bed, the wings could be tucked in. (ok that would leave the corners opened, maybe put a zipper at each corners?). Then when it was time to wash the sheet, the rubber screws could be unattached from it, because it is mushroom shaped. 

For bed cover sheet, the zipper should be all the way from the top side to the bottom side, opened it up like a book, put the bed cover in, tie it up to the sheets, and then zip it. (Ok, on the top side the zip would cause discomfort, so maybe a wing to cover it that could be buttoned? At the end of the wing you fold it inward and then button it).  

Obskuritas Bisnis Anti Kejahatan Fisik

Bencana besar yang terjadi di NTT, lebih dari 160 orang meninggal dan banyak lagi masalah sangat berat lainnya, sungguh menunjukkan keterbatasan manusia dan betapa bejatnya mereka yang menghambat kemajuan manusia (mungkin saya juga termasuk di antaranya). 

Dalam keadaan pasca-bencana masalah pertahanan dan keamanan manusia menjadi sesuatu yang sangat serius. Segala yang kita jalani hari demi hari tanpa berpikir, artikulasi arti dari kriminalitas, hak atas properti, menjadi luar biasa penting di sana. 

Urusan kejahatan fisik itu seperti bisnis yang tak ada inovasi, kesannya, karena hasil yang kita nikmati itu tidak gembar-gembor, dan kalaupun ada penjahat yang digagalkan selalu metodenya itu-itu aja: Dilacak, dikejar, disergap. Tapi di balik itu sebenarnya teknologi yang digunakan dan kepintaran yang dibutuhkan harus terus berkembang terus menerus. 

Di sinilah ada ketidak-sambungan antara investor dan venture, entah solusinya simpel atau tidak saya tidak cukup background untuk mengerti, tapi yang saya tahu pasti kejahatan di bidang ancaman kedaulatan dan kriminalitas semakin bertumbuh dan berkembang, dan kenyataan bahwa banyak dari kita bisa hidup tenang seharusnya merujuk kepada semakin canggihnya para penjaga pertahanan dan keamanan kita. 

Mungkin saya mengerti salah satu masalah besarnya, yaitu semua orang harus berhak atas hal itu. Tentu saja, dan saya yakin hanya dengan berada saja manusia itu berkontribusi kepada keadilan, bukan masalah hak, bukan masalah persamaan derajat, tapi masalah kapitalisme/kontribusi, contoh: orang di hulu menganggap membuang kotoran di sungai itu tidak masalah, sampai mereka melihat orang di hilir diare karena mereka, orang duduk duduk di pinggir lorong mengurungkan pencuri atau perampok untuk beraksi malam-malam, orang hidup sendiri di rumah kosong dan tidak keluar-keluar rumah memberi kontras tentang keadaan orang lain dan dia pada umumnya serta memberi informasi tentang prevalensi konsep properti di komunitas tersebut. Jadi saya menganggap keberadaan manusia itu adalah keberadaan keadilan, kecuali mereka secara aktif berusaha untuk tidak adil, dan semua orang berhak atas segalanya, kalau belum bisa setidaknya hal yang mendasar. Tapi biar bagaimanapun, yang berterima kasih itu mengaktifkan sirkuit ekonominya... maksudnya yang berterimakasih itu meningkatkan ketersediaan solusi dibanding yang tidak, masak demi mau menjaga kesan "adil" orang menyangkal kebenaran?

Akhirnya yang terjadi adalah, mereka yang "mengerti" dan hidup dalam bayangan, disanjung-sanjung. Dan mereka yang mau terbuka, malah akan dibilang ilegal, tukang suap, atau pemain kotor. Ini kemunafikan yang tidak baik. Terbuka maupun tidak terbuka, sejarah menunjukkan bahwa sama saja, segala barang dan jasa butuh sirkuit balas jasa untuk bisa dipertahankan. Dan demi kebohongan ini, orang-orang sudah dilenakan dan dibuat tidak siap-siap berinvestasi akan hal ini. 

Lalu mereka yang mengerti dibilang pinter mereka yang tidak dibilang bodo, seakan semua harus perduli akan hal yang sama... kan tidak adil, orang mau berspesialisasi malah dihina... padahal sebenarnya masalahnya bukan ada pada orang tersebut, tapi pada keberpihakan pada setan yang selalu tidak mau terang-terangan.

My Persuasion

I've declared allegiance to The Truth and The Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully, here's another reason why this option is better:

If you want to stop everything, you really have to make sure to prioritize the Truth. I know there would be no sufferings, but consider if there were a hint of lie during the stopping everything event... Imagine you were caught up in it. 

Instead of ending up not feeling anything, you float around in the universe helplessly as your mind oscillated between mild sufferings to intense sufferings to forgetting about it to remember every little sufferings that everything had ever endured, sometimes time went backwards (illogical interactions) and even happiness felt like sufferings. Because people had destroyed the foundations of the universe... 

So consider my allegiance, if there were some misses, we would keep on improving it as we had the foundations to kept track of it. One day, we are going to get there

For the Truth and The Inclination to Keep on Inclining Forever Truthfully

Fishy mouth? Frequent blistering/mouth ulcers? v.03

I always have fishy smell coming out of my mouth. And when I'm not doing keto, most often than not, I will have mouth ulcers / blistering all over my mouth. Recently I tried chewing that gastric tablet, for gastric pain, it says magnesium carbonate among others, and it works. My mouth ulcers instantly were not painful anymore, and some hours later they were noticeably healing, and the fishy smell was gone. 

So I believe it was a little bit of gastric acid went up to my esophagus to my mouth. Now this really seem not to be the long term solution for it, so I should go to a doctor. If you're in pain this might help, but there might be side effects, I'm not sure I've just found out some days before.

Update:

So I think I got a yeast problem, and because of my low stomach acid it facilitated the pervasiveness of the infestation, so this most likely in one way or the other caused further damages to my stomach. Therefore I assume the reason why I got a big stomach and skinny everything else is my lipid cells (fats) are protecting my stomach. And that's why I can't seem to get rid of the fat in my stomach. 

I saw a video that mentioned Apple Cider Vinegar seemed to be able to specifically target stomach fat reduction in a study. I think this is the reason why, those people in the study had low stomach acid, and ACV helped them in creating bad environment against the yeasts. But this is just my very amateur assumption with significant ignorance on the subject, far from professionalism, far from it. (But people could strike a luck too right?)

Imperfection of my definition of Justice

The things that can't have Justice are Spirits that inherently against Justice. 

Justice is when everybody/everyone gets whatever they wanted and needed whenever they wanted and needed it (Truthfully, forever). 

Spirits in this context are Inclinations, so any Inclinations that wants to make others not get what they wanted and needed (forever, Truthfully), should not get what they wanted/needed (ever). 

There we could see that the statement is not logical, simply not. But we conscious beings know what it means and it is understandable and it is not wrong. So we created terms like demons, angels, good, bad... as nuances to represent these things. 

I hypothesize that the Universe gave birth to consciousness (the tree of knowledge of good and evil) in order to tackle this problem. We, conscious beings are creatures of Justice, our relationships, our existence, has became all about Justice. Our problems, our limited resources, are our journey towards the discretion. It has became our mission, as painful as it is for us. 

Limited Resources means our Justice is not yet the true Justice but the path towards it. Our current justice is the increase of the level of availability of mutual solutions for all. 

So, who to prioritize? Whose problems got to be solved first? Who knows the Truth about what's best?

At first glance I'd say that "Prioritize those that would increase prosperity the most, and postpone those who would cause so the least". But do we really know? Who gets to decide? So now it is insulting to not use the law in making decisions about Justice... at least the law was passed down from thousands of years of death, pain, and sufferings of those before us within the honor of evolution (I'm referring to the protocols of editing/adding to the law). 

In conclusion, there is a difference in saying "You don't deserve Justice" and "Hope Justice gets to you". I prefer the later.

-------------------------------------------

But Actually, if I used transcendence, or, Justice as a transcendence:

Justice^∞, is when everyone gets whatever he/she wanted and needed whenever he/she wanted/needed them, (forever, Truthfully) except for those who are against Justice^∞

-------------------------------------------------

Would it be better if I do it like this?

Justice is when everyone, other than the Inclinations that are inherently against it, got whatever they wanted and needed whenever they wanted and needed it (perpetually to the infinite future, Truthfully).

Sense of Responsibility v.03

Sense of Responsibility is the sense to not make things worse (than the expectations).

The nuance of it though when comes to dealing with wrong/untruthful expectations, breaking the illusion would give rise to the feeling of upset. But with good sense of responsibility, people will know who is not responsible for it.

The Virtue of our time v.02

I think that we are living in a world of massive regulation of speech (being applied). This limits spontaneity, appreciation of genuine personalities, and efficiency/effectiveness of communications. 

Again I'm talking about innuendos. Because it is spiraling out of control already, every negative meaning that could be (unreasonably) derived out of your words will be considered valid. No matter what the grammar, no matter what your true intentions, it doesn't matter... what matters are, I mean the one who's going to be prioritized are, offended people. 

Can't you see that we are catering for being offended?

You said something, a generalization, just for the sake of making a point... then other people took it differently and did something bad. The current trend is to held you responsible. This would not happen if we refuse to care for innuendos. 

So I ask you whoever you are, please consider this... be spontaneous, don't give a care. If you were to express something, the first way of saying it that came out of your mind, just say it the way it is. I'm telling you no matter what it is IT WILL BE offensive. Why? because the world has gone mad. So it is virtuous for us to push back like that. Just keep on being offensive "accidentally", don't do it maliciously though. 

It is not your responsibility of other people's behaviors and feelings when you were just being honest/genuine, especially if the limitations are not well defined/articulated. 

And if people held other people responsible for offensive things that were "interpreted", realize that in the world of lies, the Truth is offensive. If you're offended by the "interpretation" of something, that was Truthful, then it is your mind that is doing that, as much as other people would think the same way... as much as the speaker would know that that would be the case, it is your realm of self control not others'

Do you even know what is going on in someone's mind when he/she uttered something liable to "interpretations?", why restrict the freedom of expression in your environment? why insult the complexity of human's thoughts by imposing dumbed down standardization of meanings? (and the standard was so dumb articulating it would be a disaster of justice). If a mob had an objection of what could be an innuendo of something, then the mob should ask for confirmations, if the mob decided not to ask and be collectively offended nonetheless, don't shift the responsibility to the utterer. It is an unnecessary restriction that's spiraling out of control, making things worse and worse for our relationships. 

STOP

----------------------------------------

Justice is always number one in human relationship, how do I came up with these things? From which a$% did I pull these thoughts from? My sense of Justice... being many doesn't make you as a collective, the embodiment of Justice.

Why is no one calling this out? v.04

Why no one competes with IFRS? Why?

No one can be acknowledged as an auditor if not because of them? That is too much power don't you think? Like a pile of sugar on the ground with ants just passing by

Audit is a human thing, no one gets to be human (officially) if not acknowledged by them?

I'm not saying they are bad people, I'm saying the situation is hen(変) big time. 

XBRL accommodates the integration of multiple standards, we should have multiple standards, multiple point of views... why are we no competing with IFRS?

--------------

CPA I meant the CPA for Auditors, I don't know why it slipped like that out of my thoughts. But yeah the certification business is a monopoly, even though they are just "organization" as if it is distinct from "businesses", they monopolize and monetize.

Why are we not competing with these organizations? Not blaming them but a working formula is hard to renew even though there might be others that are as good. And we are poorer as the harder and the harder those are to transform. 

Picture this, if we had multiple standards, open source databases of ways they were translated to each other around the world, and an application that enabled us to project them into our financial statements... wouldn't that be such a powerful way to assess a financial statement?

With only one audited standard, we could click, click, click, to see possible different versions of it. If we were to compare between different financial statements, we could do the same as well. Read between the versions instead of just take one standard at its face value. Haven't we already doing that for the secondary market share prices analysis? Why can't we do that for financial statements as well?

Personally I wouldn't value the variations' presentations to be inferior to those results produced by a single monopoly system.

--------------

So lets say a standard regulate that this industry should use the weighted average method for their inventory instead of LIFO, and another standard said that any methods are fine. Based on open information on how the other standard usually would differ from the current standard, for the type of industry, the software could simulate possible variations of the figures in the current financial statement.

At first you would need data from expert auditors of both standards to fill the database. Then when the database was good enough, the easier it would be to perform the translations. After that it would be quite seamless for all auditors to produce electronic financial statements that are dynamic and accommodates different standards. 

If we could reach that stage, from there on, users then could start to reliably click between standards for electronic financial statements analysis. To compare between industry, to create projections and compare the results, to learn or research the power of predictions of the different interpretations, preferred interpretations between different types of users as well as the usage, and wiser decision making by the respective company management.

We need different standards, we need different point of views. When we are dealing with many variables, confusion is more intuitive than certainty. 

Male Priviledges

Male are Monsters, Female are Chemists

When we crossed the line, we could destroy important delicate assets making things worse for other people. 

When the chemists crossed the line, she could drugged another person into abandoning their reason and senses of Justice, making it worse for other people. 

But the modern society is always ready to correct us from our Monster. That's our privilege

The weight of (my) contributions v.03

Everyone deserves everything in this world, but because of limited resources we respect thousands of years of history, of humanity's wisdom to allocate resources such as properties. 

Justice is when everything that we wanted and needed is fulfilled whenever we wanted and needed it, perpetually, forever, truthfully. 

However, since that's not yet, the path towards that is Justice... so to answer the question how should we share the rewards of solving problems to the contributors, the answer is Justice. The increase of the level of availability of mutual solutions perpetually, forever, and truthfully. 

It is still not easy to quantify, but at least we shunned some confusion out of the way, communism for example, doesn't accurately represent Justice, in its promoting of careless, baseless, equal distribution of resources. 

Government in all its wisdom and power and synergy is lacking in the diversification of point of views. The market in all its richness of point of views, is tainted with over commitments of speculations.

But if we could orient ourselves towards Justice, whoever we are, wherever we are, whatever our segment of the fractal is, the wisdom is there for us to find.  

----------------------------------------

When comes to share market, if people could track historical data of traders and shares (maybe using a blockchain type of system) then we could set apart between speculators and legit traders. 

So what we want to look at is the price of all the shares a trader has sold and compare the value now to the time they were sold by the trader. Traders who overall shares sold have appreciated in value/returns would be rated A, B, and those whose overall transactions ended up negative in value would be rated C, D, F. 

Then I could chose to filter the transaction board to trade only with A, B rated people. 

Of course it would also be great if we could filter the history for different ranges of time. So is this person A, B for over 5 years but at 1 year range C, D? or vice versa? 
And the historical data of the dividends paid for the relevant range of time must be accounted for in order to determine the ratings. 

Subjective? ok, Not objective? v.03

Communism = An Insult to Human Contribution

Capitalism = A Compliment to Human Contribution

If I were to get the same amount of money, I would have it on the premise of capitalism rather than communism, even if the communism pot were more, I'd prefer the lesser capitalism for the worth of it. 

Communism breeds resentment, Capitalism breeds sense of fairness, appreciation, patience, refusal to degradations, solidarity, allegiance to productivity, diverse ways of acknowledgements, and many more positivity. 

Yes resentment is a complex sentiment, but the sentiments from Capitalism are rich... resentment is poor.

Poor resentment... F U

----------------------------------------------

Which one is more valuable? 10 years worth of work not consumed, compacted in a form of asset being bet in the economy in order to contribute to it? (risking of losing everything or huge chunk of it)...

Or 1, 2, or 5 years of work fully consumed already?

But in the end, what's important is the problem being solved, not the sacrifice. But that's not the focus of the subject.

My Debate/Discussion format idea

The idea is to have a range of time of when the debate/the discussion would be ended, and then at the moderator's discretion the end of the debate/discussion would be executed within the range. It is for the sake of letting the parties debate freely without the restriction of particularities, so it would be like they would do it on the "streets". 

So instead of saying that the debate must finish in an hour, we have between 1 to 2 hours. Both parties would be given the same amount of time, but it would not be specified, one party started talking and then the other party answers, they would go back and forth freely as long as they don't talk over each other relatively speaking. Each time a party talked, their timer would be run, like chess, and eventually the moderator would end the debate by informing the party whose time is lower to match the speaking time of the other party. 

(When the speaking time for both sides have equalized, the debate were completed) 

Now... I know that defending an accusation needs more time than presenting one. However even having a lot of unanswered accusations could be a good thing if you could answer 1 or 2 in a user friendly and satisfactory way. If the audiences were engaged because of you, they would want to hear more. Plus people could point out that the other side wasn't giving out too much answers but focused on attacking too much. 

The moderator also play a crucial role in keeping the quality of the debate good.

Sufferings v.04

Living beings have the ability to choose and reject in order to stay alive, I'd like to use that as the definition of life itself. 

Living beings could adopt some inclinations and reject some inclinations, they could change the order of priorities of their way of choosing and rejecting. Any reduction of this ability is the larger definition of sufferings. So not just pain, and, not just in terms of power, a better dimension for that is wisdom. 

Reduction of one's ability to choose and reject, changing their order of priorities (of inclinations) is suffering. Putting time in perspective, you could suffer in your spirit for your short term as well as for your long term. So knowledge is power, but wisdom is better.

The Inclination to keep people away from wisdom might incorporate the inclination to perform transactions, to produce deceptions, however the inclination to perform transactions (commerce) might have the mind of its own. 

As we improve our wisdom in the practice of commerce, by utilizing our knowledge, the law, and other negotiation technologies properly, the pandemy might struck us down, but the fall wouldn't be as insufferable as before, I hope, we could recover and made this an opportunity to fix some of the mistakes we've scaled up in the past.